The Complete Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.
All of Discworld.
All of Discworld.
That’d be a pretty big book…
It’s sooooooo worth it
Now I want it in a single volume (electronic)
I’m working on that currently. I think I’m on book 6, so only about 40 more to go lol
What order are u reading them in? I just started with color of magic and am on light fantastic now!
It goes by too fast
I don’t know exactly how much of my warped view on reality is directly attributable to reading the Guide at a young age. I hope most of it.
Me too.
Likewise. I think it made us better people
After reading it in my early teens, I didn’t know anyone who might enjoy it. So I took the book and wrote a note that said “This book is not just a book you find, it also finds you.” and I put it in someones mailbox. I sometimes wonder if that person whoever it was liked it or even read it.
As a math teacher, I really wish the kids would realize that 42 is the number to beat all numbers
I’ve read the series (well only the Douglas authored books). I have a copy of The Complete Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy which I have not read. Does it make a difference?
Much like the TV minseries, book, movie, radio play and audiobooks - all incarnations of The Guide are accurate and complete, especially the parts that contradict… It just depends on which multiverse you have existen been fromme. (Universal relativism weirds language.)
At least that’s what I believe.
The Guide from Mostly Harmless agrees with you.
See? Its even more internally consistent than the Bible.
I only wish we had gotten The Salmon of Doubt.
While the Guide is important, I actually think Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency and Long Dark Teatime of the Soul might both be more important. I’m actually often saddened they didn’t get as much love as Hitchhiker’s Guide.
To me it’s a bit like the Bible. You’ve got the big few books and then so many supporting documents explaining the mindset behind the revelation.
The Douglas-authored books would be…all of the Hitchhikers’ Guide books. Which is what the Complete Hitchhiker’s Guide is.
I think it may not make a difference, no.
There is a sixth book that Jane Belson, Adam’s widow supported, called And Another Thing… written by Eoin Colfer.
I was trying to narrow it down to 1 discworld book. Ive got it down to Small Gods, Jingo or Thud!.
I also got confused whether a full stop goes after the ! Or not.
Small gods is for sure one of my favorites!
If there’s an exclamation mark (!) there’s generally no period (.).
Even in this case, where the ! is part of the title?
It was 50/50 and looks like i picked unwisely
You can think of an exclamation mark like a period that’s had a line drawn above it; it takes the place of a period, rather than having both side by side.
The exclamation mark is part of the title. I would say the hard stop goes at the end of the sentence otherwise the exclamation mark could be construed as part of the sentence and not part of the title.
You missed 0art of the assignment
1984
Was going to say this, many people cite it but never read. It is readable well, do it.
Also, I think Fahrenheit 451 translates far better to our situation, as I see media and social media in there long before it was even thinkable.
1984/farenheit 451/Brave New World are the adolescent trilogy for me that anyone who wants to understand the nature of people and mechanics of power would do well to read.
I’d add Animal Farm to that as well.
It’s good to add the other two too but I never could read brave new world, I struggled page by page and gave up. Can not name a specific reason other than I could not get into it.
From a story perspective it should be perfect for me.
Aldos Huxley is not a great writer. I think he had a better understanding of humanity than Orwell… Or at least, I feel like his books are more insightful, but he is not as good of a writer.
One of the few times reading a translated book is better tgan the original, I read it in Spanish and I guess the translator made it more tolerable because I’m not much of a reader at all (I’ve read at most five books on my own, less if we don’t count unfinished)
Thanks, confirmed.
As they say, Orwell didn’t stop it from happening, he just postponed it by 30-40 years.
A People’s History of the United States, by Howard Zinn.
There is so, so much that Americans don’t know that they don’t know.
Reading that right now. Definitely changing my perspective that America was once a good place.
Follow it up with Settlers, a history of settler-colonialism and the slave trade in the US. No matter how much you think you know about the history of indigenous genocide and chattel slavery in the US, reality is likely far worse than you think.
I’m curious; Would you mind to give some highlights?
Got some random highlights? I’m curious how many I’ve seen mentioned on Lemmy.
The first that I usually mention is the Coal Wars / Battle of Blair Mountain or the Sand Creek Massacre, but there are many events that American students are made to be ignorant if on purpose.
It also got me to learn that after meeting the natives for the first time, Columbus literally wrote in his diary about how easy it would be to steal from them because they were so peaceful.
Cool, I knew about those! The ones that threw me for a loop were Seneca Village (Black community bulldozed for Central Park) and the bombing by police in Philly in 1983.
Oh yeah. Thank you for sharing.
I’ve heard of those two as well, but even so, there’s a lot written about in the book that I never learned, even through the earning of my bachelors degree, which is why I’m always quick to recommend that people read it.
A pixie book or equivalent. Pixie books are short children’s books (maybe 12 DinA6 pages with very little text and lots of pictures). They are dirt cheap and there is a big bowl full of them in many books stores in Germany. They are meant to get kids into reading and that’s why I ‘nominated’ them here xD
Excluding religious text~
Meditations by Marcus Aurelius
Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari
Any book written by Cormac McCarthy
11/22/63 by Stephen King
Short stories by Kurt Vonnegut
Do Androinds Dream of Electric Sheep by Philip K. Dick
Definitely lots more
I like where this list is going, having read all those. I’m curious what else you would add to it!
A History of the World in 6 Glasses by Tom Standage (was my favorite book for years)
World War Z by Max Brooks
The Stand by Stephen King
Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl
Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche
The Silence of the Lambs by Thomas Harris
The Chamber by John Grissom
The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert Heinlein
Armor by John Steakley
Off the top of my head but I’m sure lots more would qualify if I looked at my library.
This is great! 'The History of the World in Six Glasses" and “The Moon is a Harsh Mistress” look especially intriguing.
I’ve read Victor Frankel and Nietzsche before, otherwise they would be intriguing as well.
I’m currently reading Steinbeck’s East of Eden, and it may be a while before I finish it. But, when I do, I thank you for the next in queue.
I was about to type ‘I’ve been meaning to read that’ for the Stephen King book, but I have now and it’s fine. I wouldn’t call it a must read. As a time travel story it’s in the top three
Instead of Sapiens I’d suggest The Dawn of Everything.
Any book written by Cormac McCarthy
I tried to listen to the audio book of Blood Meridian and it was awful. I couldn’t stomach it.
I haven’t tried to audio book his stuff. The style of writing seems like it wouldn’t translate well. I think Blood Meridian is my second favorite book he wrote.
It wasn’t the style that bothered me. It was the horrible acts committed by the main characters. Just non-stop brutality.
Oh, I mean yeah they are bad people and based off real people that existed. The Judge is also literally an allegory for the devil/pure evil. Its a good book about bad people. The Road might be more your speed. Still plenty of evil characters but at least your protagonists are good. The boy in that story is basically the antithesis of the judge and is representative of purity in the face of evil. Still has some particularly rough parts. I get what you’re saying though. I tapped out of American Psycho for like 3 years after one particularly rough section, only finished it recently. Different author but the only book I’ve had to put down.
I have BM audiobook downloaded on my phone. I haven’t read many books but this one is probably top 3 for me.
Dune.
The book of the universe of books
I read all of those by Frank, and none of the others
Meditations by Marcus Aurelius.
Came here to suggest that.
The Dispossessed by Ursula Le Guin.
Few other sci-fi books do as good a job of depicting how a gift/library economy could work like in practice. It’s quite a hopeful vision of where we can collectively go in the future.

That reminds me that I really need to put more le guin into my book pile
It also shows a realistic version of utopian hope. An eternal struggle for better
1984, so that people mentioning it online will stop sounding like complete fucking idiots.
Or perhaps The Jungle; it sparked public outcry and major overhauls the last time it became popular, maybe it can work its magic again.
1984 was about the government being able to read your mind so they can give you a rat, right?
No, that was the diary of Ann Frank actually.
deleted by creator
No,I think that’s Helter Skelter (?)
wasnt that He-man’s nemisis?
He-man’s nemesis is She-man, everybody knows that.
I was going to say this.
1984, A Brave New World and Fahrenheit 451.
Add Animal Farm to that list.
The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck. Just the intermissions would get everyone’s blood boiling.
One of my favorite books and unfortunately lots of the story still is relevant today.
A lot of fiction here so I’ll go the other way and suggest “Perfectly Legal: The Covert Campaign to Rig Our Tax System to Benefit the Super Rich–and Cheat Everybody Else” by David Cay Johnston.
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/291700/perfectly-legal-by-david-cay-johnston/
If people aren’t outraged, they aren’t paying attention.
Sample:
"Once, Blattmachr devised a way that Bill Gates, the richest man in America, could reap $200 million in profits on Microsoft stock without paying the $56 million of capital gains taxes that federal law required at the time. The plan was so lucrative that Gates would not have to pay a single dollar in tax and would even be entitled to an income tax deduction of $6 million or so. And that was just the initial plan. The concept could be applied endlessly, allowing Gates to convert billions of dollars in Microsoft stock gains into cash over the years. So long as the Internal Revenue Service did not challenge the deals, then Gates could realize unlimited capital gains without the pain of taxes.
The trick was in manipulating charitable trusts, a common enough device used by generous people who own an asset, such as stock or a building that has appreciated in value. Instead of selling the asset and investing the after-tax proceeds, an individual or a married couple can donate the asset to a charitable trust that they control. The trust sells the asset tax-free and invests the proceeds, giving the donating individual or couple a lifetime income, typically 6 percent per year. When the donors die, what remains in the trust, typically half its value, goes to charity.
Blattmachr’s plan was to take back not 6 percent annually for life, but 80 percent per year for two years. Gates could have pocketed at least $192 million without paying any tax. Then the trust would fold and a charity would get the remaining sum, less than $8 million. Under the plan Gates could have converted into cash more than 96 percent of gains on the Microsoft shares he donated, not the 72 percent he was entitled to after federal capital gains taxes. The charity would get less than four cents on each donated dollar. The government would collect nothing.
The scheme even created a tax deduction that was enough to reduce Gates’s income taxes by about $2 million.
Whether Gates took advantage of such a plan is not known for sure because the law makes individual income tax records confidential. What is known is that when Blattmachr made this route available to others, it sold like a treasure map where X marks the tax-free spot. Billions of dollars of assets poured into these short-term charitable trusts and their super-rich owners took many millions of dollars of income tax deductions that further cut into the flow of revenue to the government.
The technique was so outlandish that when some other tax lawyers got their hands on the map in March 1994, they sent it to the Department of the Treasury in a plain brown envelope. That July, Treasury blocked the route to newcomers and said that it would pursue those who used the device. However, the Internal Revenue Service never announced whether it collected any of the taxes. One hint that the IRS may not have acted against those who used the technique can be found in the records of United States Tax Court, which is where taxpayers challenge the IRS. There are no Tax Court cases in which taxpayers fought for a court blessing on the device, known in taxspeak as an “accelerated charitable remainder trust.”
The Treasury rules shutting down this route to tax-free investment profits were not the end of stretching charitable trusts in ways never anticipated by Congress. So facile is Blattmachr’s mind that from those 1994 rules he divined a new route to tax-free gains. He started selling a new treasure map and billions of dollars more in capital gains passed untaxed into the bank accounts of his clients before the government blocked that second path, known in taxspeak as “son of accelerated charitable remainder trust.”
There’s been a lot of abuse of Trusts in finance for a while. This seems like a good recommendation.
One thing I don’t follow; if someone puts their money into a charitable trust, achieving those lighter tax rules, wouldn’t the obvious rule be that the trust could only then be spent on communal benefit, NOT withdrawn as a personal piggy bank?
It’s fine if someone wants to make an account that is given to charity in case of their death, but then pro-charity tax rules shouldn’t take effect until they die. I’m confused as to why it wouldn’t work that way.
Sounds like a loophole that was either accidentally or intentionally inserted. This book is full of them.
Hah. I’d be happy to hear that everyone read at least one book in their lifetime.
Which is ridiculous. I’ve read one book since the weekend.
It should be made clear though that there are book and there are Books. I feel like this question is about the latter and those are not the ones you had to read in as part of your middle/high school curriculum. Also the one that I read probably doesn’t qualify as a capital B book.
A Wizard of Earthsea by Ursula K. Le Guin.
the only thing about this is the first book is great and then the series overall is kinda a letdown.
I don’t agree at all. The first book was great, no argument there - but the series matures with Le Guin as it goes. It’s a truly magnificent breakdown of the fantasy genre.
Atlas Shrugged
(Haha just kidding!)
I’ve bought that crap after the BBC promoted it with a dedicated article many years ago… It’s such a boring and average book … I felt scammed.
A former boss told me it was his favourite book. He didn’t like it when I laughed at him because I thought he was joking.
The Fountainhead was actually an interesting enough story even if you don’t agree with the message Rand conveyed.
Atlas shrugged is just… Verbose. Has a plot but my god, the pages upon pages of monologue was too much.
But in the end neither are required reading (and I know you weren’t suggesting as such.)
The bible.
Sodom and Gomorrah and the story of Jacob are basically an iq test.
Not only do the stories sound highly unreal, even if they are real the only rational conclusion is that god is evil and petty.
That said, the philosophies of Jesus are pretty cool and often still relevant today.
Well of course god is the evil one.
Genesis. Dude invented sin by putting a random tree down with a whole made up lore on it for no reason other to tempt his “beloved” creation. Of course it all goes to plan—since the dude apparently knows what comes ahead of time—and he gets to do what he wanted all along; fuck with the ants.
And Lucifer, the only person to try overthrow this monster tragically lost and paid the ultimate price for it.
This slots in so much better than the original, I think. They should incorporate it into Diablo somehow.
The “Gnostics” believed that the Creator wasn’t really the God, but a malevolent lesser deity who condemned our consciousness to the suffering of the physical world.
Dueuteronomy FTW
18 If someone has a stubborn and rebellious son who does not obey his father and mother and will not listen to them when they discipline him, 19 his father and mother shall take hold of him and bring him to the elders at the gate of his town. 20 They shall say to the elders, “This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious. He will not obey us. He is a glutton and a drunkard.” 21 Then all the men of his town are to stone him to death
Imagine wiping an entire city off the face of the earth because they just are a bit kinky. That was the loving and just god.
Of course Jesus said to basically throw out the entire old testament and focus on the love one another bits, but it doesn’t seem like the churches caught that
Sodom and Gomorrah were about raping guests, not sodomy
Even then, the whole city? Women and children too? There were no innocents there? Nah I don’t buy it. If god was all powerful he could have selectively smoten.
Oh absolutely, evil evil god, but the sin of sodom wasn’t what Christian pastors want you to think
Jesus absolutely did not say that. He said to follow the law.
Matthew 5:17-20 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law until all is accomplished. Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven."
Skip the begats bits



















