• ChristmasIslandZone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    When seatbelts were introduced to cars, there was a big movement against them. Some by car manufacturers to keep costs down, but a lot of backlash was from good ol’ natural born idiots so contrarian and averse to change they’d let themselves die just to give a smug look about not doing what someone asked of them. The sort of dumbass who during the height of pre-vaccine Covid would drown in the fluid buildup in their lungs and refuse treatment because doing so would be an admission of fault.

    These past 9 years have made me DEEPLY cynical about my fellow man. There is no bottom. No level of malicious stupidity is low enough. It’s not even disappointment anymore, I’m resigned to it. Some people are so beyond hope, so beyond redemption, it’s like trying to get a fucking deer to recognize itself in a mirror. Just ZERO awareness, no theory of mind, object permanence is a fucking coin flip. If it weren’t for my principles, my absolute refusal to engage in dehumanization, I’d be tempted to write them off as another species just to cope with the dissonance that comes from seeing people acting that self destructive. Like it doesn’t make sense. You’d expect at some point some form of pattern recognition and harm avoidance to develop. “Hey, putting my hand on the stove hurt. It hurt every time I did it. It hurt everyone I saw someone else do it too. I’m gonna put my hand on the stove and it won’t hurt this time.”.

    • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      I was annoyed about the seatbelt laws, but I was a little kid at the time. I came from an era of riding in the back of dad’s truck and enjoying the breeze. Hell, I went from New England to Canada in the back of a capped truck. I was eight years old and never thought anything of it.

      However, as I got older into my teens I got more adamant about using a seat belt, even when the laws were still sorta gray here (you were let off with no warning most times). Now its second nature, even if I’m heading 3 mins to the store. Some people still don’t because they think that they’re only endangering themselves. Thing is, I have a brother in law that’s a first responder. He’s seen people torpedo out of windows in head-on collisions and into the other car, injuring the other driver/passengers.

      Honestly, I don’t get what the whole problem is. You barely even notice them on you. Most people who don’t put on a simple and comfortable safety belt are just being fucking stubborn children who don’t like being told what to do. I’m glad I grew out of that way of thinking. Some my family are those “good ol’ natural borns”. They’ll tell me I don’t have to put my seatbelt on and every time I adamantly say, “I always do”. My other brother in law will literally crank the radio so he can’t hear the seatbelt alarm. Drives me insane, but I love the idiot.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        I hated them as a kid because they were uncomfortable and didn’t fit right. My mom made is wear it but I used to put the chest belt behind my back as soon as she turned around because it dug into my neck. I probably should have been in a car seat for way longer than I was. As an adult I don’t even notice it.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Untethered occupants are a serious danger to other occupants in their own car. I wouldn’t agree to drive with someone who wouldn’t put one on tbh, partly because it hints at a lack of judgement and I wouldn’t want that person in charge of the car.

    • ceiphas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      There are still people that buy “belt silencers” or sit on their seatbelts to drive without. Newer cars will alarm, and mine even shuts down if you drive without a seatbelt

      • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        My sister’s boyfriend bought an oldtimer with no seatbelt. The previous owner installed some and he took them out again. I think there is nothing that brings him more joy than to tell people how he doesn’t need a seatbelt. He also drives his children around in this deathtrap. But he also refuses to wear a helmet when they ride their ebike. My sister nagged so long about it that he now takes the helmet with him, but he doesn’t wear it, that’s the compromise they reached. Some people are just fucking weird.

      • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think those are mostly for super obese people because seat belts are really uncomfortable if you’re really, really fat. At least that’s what I always assumed because everyone I know who has one is really fat.

    • stembolts@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I enjoyed reading this. Well put. I also share this recent realization. It’s made me feel a bit less imposter syndrome. Among other things.

    • subarctictundra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think there is a growing divide between the most and least intelligent in society, and it has been growing with tech advancement (the gap wouldn’t have been that big in the middle ages). If we ever develop superintelligent AI, I can see that becoming an inflection point in this divide because we (Lemmy dwellers) will become as fallible to that AI as the people you mentioned are today in what is still a human-dominated society. Introducing AGI will vastly exasperate the gap between the most and least intelligent and I can’t see society surviving that in its current form.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Not quite.

        Tech’s facilitated a lot of things, but not a schism in intelligence. That requires systemic destruction of education systems, especially those that focus on critical thinking and comprehension.

        No matter how smart you are, we’re still herd animals. Get enough loud drivers and it infects everyone.

        Boomers have their odd naivete and emotional immaturity from intergenerational trauma, but Zoomers have something i consider worse - a self-righteousness that demands the appearance of purity and correct behaviour. It’s more important to be seen to say nothing wrong than do the right thing. It’s the weird US paradigm of posturing puritanism on steroids - and unfortunately the interconnectivity of the internet has facilitated that infection

  • Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    LOL, libs are trying to ban asbestos! They want us all to catch fire! Asbestos causing cancer is a conspiracy, do your own research. Besides, Ivermectin will cure any cancer caused by asbestos.

    /s (because the USA is crazy and someone would really post this and mean it)

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I can see them railing a line of asbestos just to own the libs. Better than vaccine denial I suppose, at least it limits the damage.

      • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        A guy I went to HS with definitely did this one time on a dare. A piece of insulation fell out of the kiln in shop class n another kid smashed it n told this kid he’d give him $5 to snort it. No one thought he would, but this dude absolutely railed it. Someone asks the shop teacher later what the tiles were made of and he says asbestos mostly, but it’s fine as long as you don’t mess with it. 💀

        I keep checking on his Facebook every couple of years to see if lung cancer got him. So far, he’s still kicking lol.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    5 days ago

    I used to live in a city called Asbestos, the mine was closed back in 2012 and older folks are still angry about it, they’ll even tell you that the workers handling it weren’t in worse health than anyone else in the city… The worst part is that it was banned in the construction industry 30 years prior, so they kept exploiting the mine only to export it to countries that hadn’t banned it, even if it meant killing people there…

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m a little surprised Trump hasn’t signed the “Asbestos Fibers Are Our Friends” Executive Order.

  • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    If CFCs were banned today you would see people spraying them in the air to own the libs, also spraying their children with DDTs because RFK Jr told them to

    • andallthat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      worth giving it a try…do NOT, I repeat do NOT spray RFK Jr with DDT every time you see him. I am a liberal and this would really make me cry. Don’t do it!

  • SolidShake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Depends who would ban it. From my life experience, we have one side that definitely would because they get mad at anything the other side. ANYTHING. While the other side is typically more rational and has critical thinking skills.

      • Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah, dumb liberals with their dumb vaccines and pasteurized milk and fluoridated water and science. 🙄

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Liberals were against vaccines long before conservatives were. It was never mainstream, but it was getting there.

          • Wiz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Source?

            I remember in the 90 or maybe 00s a study coming out that said vaccine scepticism was about even between liberals and conservatives.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            5 days ago

            I hate that the word fascist has become the new slur people use when they hear something that is against there core political beliefs. There are real fascists but they are not everyone who isn’t far left. I see this turning into a left version of the red scare. People are getting increasingly extreme and violent on each side which is dangerous for the long term stability of the US. In reality I think we need more moderate politicians who are willing to reach across political briefs and backgrounds.

            • swab148@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              We needed that 40 years ago, in 2025 we have to fight against actual fascists doing actually fascist things.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      5 days ago

      What other side? Sure there are always a few rational people. However the vast majority choose a side and then blindly oppose anything the other side says/does. When their side happens to have critical thinking on their side they are for that, but that isn’t a factor in why they choose something.

      Trying to convince yourself otherwise proves that you are ignoring the issues on your own side. If you really were a rational thinker you would have to choose your side separately for every single issue - nobody has time for that which in turn means you sometimes rely on someone who turns out to be irrational but because they have proved rational in other areas you trust them here too.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        If you really were a rational thinker you would have to choose your side separately for every single issue - nobody has time for that

        This really is not that difficult nor time consuming.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              There are literally hundreds of complex interconnected issues that affect our daily lives. It is impossible to have a well-informed stance on all of them. No one benefits from strong opinions based on an oversimplified understanding. That’s childish.

              • scintilla@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 days ago

                The things that directly affect me are all things that one side is against. One side wants to remove my ability to be myself get mental health care etc.

                I don’t love the other side but it’s the only one that will allow me time to get to a point where I can be useful in getting my ideas to people.

      • SolidShake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m an independent thinker. In the past republicans and democrats had both good and bad ideas.

        In today’s world democrats are more for the people as a country and care more about citizens, example, making sure kids in schools get free lunches, “no child should go hungry” as they understand not everyone is rich and can afford proper meals for dinner later in the day, the cause being maybe medical debt or other unforseen hardships, example. A car accident and need a sudden co-payment of $2000 to fix or replace their car. While republicans want to stop free lunches to save 12¢ extra in a state/county tax. So I’ve seen Republicans only show greed for themselves which in turn completely halts advancements in a society. Example, private healthcare. You would pay significantly less in a raise in federal tax compared to a monthly premium+ medical bills. The math isn’t that hard to do, but Republicans are so blinded by the thought of "my hard earned money is for me and not for Susan who has 3 kids and her husband has terminal cancer. Now she has to pay $250,000 when he dies.

        So in short. Democratic party in my eyes has been for people. Republican party in my eyes has been for themselves and everyone else can live in the streets.

      • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        If you have morals and standards, its not hard to take a stance on every issue. If you support education, it doesnt take much looking into anything about education to understand how decisions fit into your worldview. And even if you support some aspects of one side and some from the other, you still have to pick a side because welcome to Americas 2 party system.

        My experience with many users on lemmy who support “critical thinking” are not actually advocating critical thinking. Theyre trying to justify their mental gymnastics while simultaneously feeding their self-righteous egos

      • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        If you really were a rational thinker you would have to choose your side separately for every single issue

        1. You should already do this for anything you care about? It really, really doesn’t take long for the important stuff. For everything else -
        2. You don’t need to take a side on things you don’t understand. If you haven’t had the time to assess something… don’t share an opinion about it. It’s perfectly functional and rational for humans to specialize and leave problems for other humans to deal with. It is only social media that convinced people they should care about literally everything.
        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          It takes a lot of thought and research to come up with a good opinion on some subjects. Some subjects are easy because of values, but you need a lot of study to understand other subjects.

          You need to have an opinion on things you don’t understand. There are people for and against vaccines - this is a very complex subject and both sides have what sounds like science behind them, and both also have real medical doctors. You are affected though so you better get to the bottom of it as both sides will tell you the wrong choice is a disaster.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I also think it hasn’t helped that the news as become more of a propaganda outlet. They probably live in a bubble.

        • ...m...@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          …this is the crux of it: until we confront the disinformation sphere authoritatively, the problem will persist, and crossing that line is antithetical to the american identity…

          …i fear that the american identity must immolate itself, one way or the other…

          • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            We simply weren’t ready for the internet. Humans haven’t really been ready for any of the advances we have ever made. Hank Green has an excellent video about the societal vulnerability to new communications technology. I don’t know how we address it, because we never really addressed the others either.

            The original printing press enabled Luther to break the Church’s theocracy. More modern printing enabled newspapers to instigate the Spanish American war. The technology is still used in the modern day for propaganda and lies.

            The radio enabled the Nazis and the Red Scare to fill people’s homes with hate and fear. The technology is still used in the modern day for propaganda and lies.

            The TV enabled the police state and “law and order”-style Republican disinformation. People who were otherwise safe and comfortable at home were suddenly and constantly faced with escalating panic about criminals and terrorists, even while crime consistently decreased over time. The technology is still used in the modern day for propaganda and lies.

            All of these new technologies didn’t just change the way we communicated - they changed the way we thought about the world. Or rather, people in the right places at the right times used that technology to change how we thought about the world. We are human, and every new communications technology gives an ever smaller group of humans ever greater influence over the world.

            And finally, the internet. We thought it would be different. We thought it would give voices to the many. But instead it gave the wealthy access to the soundboards where they can silence and amplify voices, and it opened up town squares for even the most hateful and ignorant ideas to gather and fester and grow to become legitimate political forces.

            The internet enabled all of the massive changes we see today.

            Welcome to the internet.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            It is sad to me that Lemmy has been taken over by people calling others fascist. I think from a moderation perspective any highly political content should be removed immediately unless it is in the proper community. I’m tied of see comment after comment talking about how everyone and there dog is a fascist and other related rhetoric. It is ultimately easier to name call than it is to actually show empathy to someone you absolutely disagree with. I like to read other peoples options but the problem is that many here have turned a option into fact. Asking why they feel some way just pisses people off and makes them defensive instead of generating good discussions. Words like “fascism” ultimately serve the interests of those in power not individuals. It is used as a tool to get people emotionally engaged instead of mentally engaged. Emotional people are much easier to control and influence.

            In short, I’m saddened to see Lemmy be taken over by useless political circle jerking. None of it does anything useful other than scare off new Lemmy users.

            • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Words like “fascism” ultimately serve the interests of those in power not individuals. It is used as a tool to get people emotionally engaged instead of mentally engaged.

              This is nonsense, sorry. I get it. Think for yourself. Assess your sources. Think rationally. Challenge your own beliefs.

              But the people in power are openly breaking the law, abusing authority that they don’t have, stripping away rights, dismantling the social safety net, shipping people off to die, and ignoring any of the constitutional and legal safeguards meant to prevent any of this. It’s fascism.

              Any logical, rational, thoughtful approach to the situation will provide the same exact answer as the emotional response to seeing Trump and Bukele laugh and lie about Kilmar Abrego being a terrorist. Call a spade a spade.

            • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              ICE agents under the republican-elected Donald Trump’s republican administration arrested the wrong brown person, and after realizing this, said “take him anyway.”

              This is it, possiblylinux. That’s the SS. We have the gestapo. There is no more “fiscal conservative.” There is no more “classical libertarian.” We are nazis now.

              You can either be a classical american war hero and strongly oppose this, or you can be a nazi. Those are your options. I’m not saying this euphemistically. I’m not saying it as a metaphor. I’m not exaggerating for dramatic effect.

              If you do not live in the US currently, and you do not want to be relocated to Guantanamo Bay or El Salvador, then you should not come here.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s not about them actually being the same.

          What @lowleekun@ani.social is saying is that no one sees themselves as the bad guy, regardless of what their opponents think.

        • lowleekun@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          Look mate i agree but when arguing with comservatives that the exact same attitude that they give you and it annoys me because it is not a real argument to say “you are wrong and have no critical thinking skills” yet here we are again.

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Conservatives are wrong and are reactionary in a way that shows they have no critical thinking skills. It is ok to acknowledge that.

            • ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              It won’t win anyone to your side if you’re trying to convince them and say that though. That’ll just harden them in their views.

              If you really want to reduce the influence of the right then you’d want to stop that sort of language spreading

              • snooggums@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                No, treating them as reasonable people is the reason they took power. They cannot be reasoned with as proven by decades of them hardening their views while they were treated as “reasonable people with differing views”.

                No, I won’t cater to the idea that pointing out problems makes them worse.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I’m in a comment war with a nicotine denialist on here now!

    In the 90s, there were still tons of people angry about seat belt laws. It’s every American’s God Given Right to fly out of the windshield and probably kill someone else.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          As a left libertarian, I have a hard time arguing against seatbelt laws. As in, I know they aren’t consistent with my ideology, but the outcomes of having these laws are so much better than not having them. The only thing that I can say against them is that they’re one of the more commonly used bullshit pretexts for initiating traffic stops. I rationalize this trade off and violation of ideals by pointing out that the government has created a fucked up transportation market by enforcing car centrism, and until we can unfuck that, we need to deal with the side effects.

          • andros_rex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            5 days ago

            I think the argument is more about the impact on others. If you aren’t wearing a seatbelt, you become a projectile that can harm others - both in your car and outside of your car.

            In general, I agree that ideologically it’s a little uncomfortable to dictate personal choices, but when it comes to road safety I think the government has reasonable grounds to enforce certain expectations (same with things like insurance.)

            It is uncomfortable to give police more pretenses to stop people but road safety perhaps is one of those things we could have a hypothetical “good police force” take care of.

            • shottymcb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              4 days ago

              Government dictating that citizens MUST give money to a private company who then gives money to the politicians who make that mandate is wildly immoral. Insurance should be a government program.

              • andros_rex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                Insurance as a whole should be a sort of “public union” thing. No profit motive, everyone who participates in something like driving has to pay some fee for insurance, maybe along with things like registration. Ideally along with massive improvements to public transit.

                The concept of private insurance under capitalism seems at odds with itself. You have to pay out a good chunk less then you take in to turn a profit, and the best way to do that is be useless and fuck over your customers. (With health - Cigna was supposed to cover my top surgery. Pay for it up front be reimbursed reimbursed later. Then, later, it turns out that my employer specifically included a rider that excluded it. I’ve talked elsewhere about how I’ve paid CareCredit back.)

                I don’t know if we should nationalize auto insurance without doing health insurance first though. Would the government be negotiating deals with mechanics? I think hospitals have structures that are easier to unionize and generally smarter/kinder folks than the general population. Mechanics tend to skew the type that’d get upset over navigating fender bender payouts with Uncle Sam, probably going to be harder to get to understand that their labor rights are good things.

            • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Ehhhh… Traffic stops are more often than not excuses to fish for other, more serious violations or initiate a civil asset forfeiture. It’s actually one of the big reasons I’m hugely pro-transit and anti-car-centrism, because it robs the state of a huge excuse for initiating police contacts.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Where’d you get a picture off all my elder family members in one place!? (j/k)

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      5 days ago

      People are emotional. They feel things, and then make up justifications for it afterwards. We all do this to some extent, in some contexts or others, but some people seem to do it the majority of the time.

      Someone who smokes and has a choice between admitting they fucked up, they’re hurting themselves and those around them, OR denying it so they’re just a persecuted innocent? A lot of people will go for the latter. It’s weakness and cowardice, but saying that won’t change their mind. If results are wanted we have to do the very arduous task of massaging their emotions and I kind of resent that thankless, endless, work. Even though I almost certainly am the same way about other things.

      Humans are a mess.

      • thejoker954@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        As a former smoker (now vaper) I understand and agree with non smokers about smoking inside.

        However the people who bitch about smokers outside in public piss me off.

        Yes my cigarette (now vape) is soooooo much worse than the exhaust of the thousands of cars /generators/construction equipment and so on that are constantly running all around us.

        But out of sight out of mind. They can’t see all that exhaust shit so it doesn’t exist - But those fucking smokers how dare they.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          5 days ago

          I also get mad at people who drive cars instead of walking or taking mass transit, if that helps.

          But someone smoking near you makes your day undeniably, immediately, worse.

          If you’re sitting in a room that smells uncomfortably of cheese, and someone rips a juicy fart on your face, it would be unreasonable to be like “who cares about my shart it smells like cheese in here”

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes my cigarette (now vape) is soooooo much worse than the exhaust of the thousands of cars /generators/construction equipment and so on that are constantly running all around us.

          The problem is that nicotine itself isn’t a carcinogen, but increases the effectiveness of other carcinogens. So like, the nic is going to make that car exhaust/etc more harmful.

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          I don’t breath in exhaust either, fully concentrated. I have as much of a problem with diffused cigarette smoke as diffused exhaust, but I fucking hate smokers that make me breath in their second hand fully potent, carcinogenic, horrible smelling smoke.

        • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I stop bitching about smokers when they manage to not throw their garbage everywhere.

          And yes i know, of course you are the one smoker that has a pocket ashtray.

          • thejoker954@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Lol, I actually did when I smoked cigs. I can’t stand littering.

            I also manage to return my cart even in shitty weather ;)

        • scintilla@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          I have asthma and when I walk past a smoker it makes it harder for me to breathe for a while afterwards. I don’t have the same issue with vapes though so I don’t really care about those even inside of they smell nice.

            • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              I just find it kida gross to inhale something that already was in someone elses lung. It doesn’t matter if it smells like cotton candy. It’s pointless and stupid

            • scintilla@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Looked it up and I had no idea how bad second hand vapor can be. I don’t vape or smoke but I’ll give them both the same level of stink eye going forward.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          My step dad had like 4 or 5 DUIs. When I was in elementary school, me and my siblings would get the privilege of “helping” start the car by showing how awesome we were at breathing!

          Like, if you can afford the lawyers and come off as the right kind of good ol’ boy it doesn’t seem to matter. I think at one point he got weekend prison. He’d drive us to school with a high ball sitting in the center console.

          • BakerBagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Lot of people in my town with “party plates”. Yellow plate with red letters to signal to cops that you are a frequent DUI fiend. No clue how youend up with those instead of just having your license revoked

    • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      Real men aren’t held back by anything! The belt restricts blood flow through the body! It’s a globalist conspiracy to turn our men into women!

      • Cargon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Imagine having a heart so weak that a little piece of fabric over your chest restricts your blood flow.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      My father was an anti-seatbelter up until 2010-ish, when he got a newer car with a better seatbelt system.

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      I am evil for this and I admit it.
      Seat belts laws should not be enforced on adults. A windshield dive is a good cure for stupid, I bet a lot of MAGA would literally go out like that.

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Trauma, potential physical harm to others. A whole set of reasons they should be enforced. I get what you’re saying though.

        • Wilco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Oh, I know it’s a bad point of view. In my defense I live in a no motorcycle helmet state. As long as you carry the insurance for it.

            • Wilco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              You should see our gun laws. Buy it, carry it however and wherever you want. Constitutional carry.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Hey guys! Today we will talk about Asbestos 🤯😵😱 Scary! I know!

    But I’m here to tell you that actually, asbestos is super useful and the health hazards are so out of proportion! And this brings me to my sponsor, Asbet Health! Asbet Health have given my viewers a 20% discount for the next 30 days on ALL of their 100% asbestos clothing! We are talking about light, breathable, fire resistant and stain resistant clothing that has been proven to support your health!*

    *Not FDA approved

  • Auzy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    4 days ago

    Here in Australia we just banned engineered stone because it tends to cause silicosis

    And yep, lots of shitty business owners whined and a few shit customers on Facebook

    Silicosis is what’s killing people at the moment, and business owners in particular don’t seem to care, despite the fact there’s is alternatives

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      I have no idea engineered stones causes silicosis. Is it the manufacturing or the installation or the home owner getting too close to it that causes it?

      • Auzy@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        4 days ago

        When it’s cut for bench tops and such , that’s what exposes people.

        Lots of stonemasons here in Australia now have silicosis because of it.

        Natural stone has far less issues and there is stone available which doesn’t cause it

        Business owners were also claiming they weren’t given enough time to switch. Everyone including me (I have a friend with silicosis now) has known engineered stone was dangerous to work with for years.

        So they had years of warning that it was dangerous But they pretend like it was unexpected.

        • dumblederp@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          4 days ago

          We (srtaya) tried to introduce cutting standards as the silicosis is avoidable, but the cutting technique is more expensive so it got skipped for the cheaper dangerous methods.

          • Auzy@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 days ago

            You probably know about it more than me…

            I’ve been onsite plenty of times when they’ve been cutting that stuff up. Some owners argued better PPE would be enough for the Stonemasons, but it won’t protect other people where its being cut.

            Furthermore, nobody NEEDS engineered stone anyway, and people tend to take shortcuts when they are in a rush

            And its mainly the workers affected. The people selling it are sometimes the ones who aren’t even cutting it up (especially because they know there are risks).

            Feel bad for my friend though who now has silicosis and no way to cure it.

            • dumblederp@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 days ago

              It was the same with asbestos, there were correct handling procedures but they were skipped enough for people to still get sick from it. Better we don’t use it if we don’t need to.

  • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    “When we had asbestos there was less autism. Big pharma teamed up with big construction to screw us up”