Childhood nostalgia is a pretty big deal for nearly all humans. That is why a Charizard card sells for 10k. There is something in your life that you miss, it is just not Harry Potter.
A lot of people look back for many reasons and everyone has their own attachments. It is upsetting to lose an attachment and have part of your childhood tainted by the present.
Let people grieve for the past, it is normal and healthy.
The first 2-3 books maybe, but Joanne really tried to push for a more mature tone, with none of the writing skills to back it up. Slavery, creatures that devour your soul, date rape, torture to the point of insanity, political corruption, the rise of fascism, grief, child soldiers, analogies about aid-riddled homosexuals targeting children. None of these are topics for a children’s book, let alone one written by a bigoted idiot.
I don’t think the books suck. They are suitable for the age group they are intended for. People act like they’re supposed to be great literature or something, though.
It doesn’t matter that they’re unoriginal - the target audience don’t know that. It’s the first time they’ve seen these things, so they feel original to them.
Holllld up. No reason to act like kids don’t deserve media of a higher caliber, or that media created with them in mind can’t be just as enjoyable for adults. Harry Potter is far from my hyperfixation but I can’t stand these arguments no matter where they crop up.
Oh they certainly do. It’s always saddened me that these books are what grabbed the imagination of a generation when Terry Pratchett’s books were right there.
But that said, they did get a lot of kids into reading and I hope they explored further. It feels like a lot just hyper-focused on HP, though.
That’s because they’re books for children. Has everyone forgotten this?
The average Harry Potter fan is still nostalgic for their lost childhood innocence I guess.
Childhood nostalgia is a pretty big deal for nearly all humans. That is why a Charizard card sells for 10k. There is something in your life that you miss, it is just not Harry Potter.
A lot of people look back for many reasons and everyone has their own attachments. It is upsetting to lose an attachment and have part of your childhood tainted by the present.
Let people grieve for the past, it is normal and healthy.
The first 2-3 books maybe, but Joanne really tried to push for a more mature tone, with none of the writing skills to back it up. Slavery, creatures that devour your soul, date rape, torture to the point of insanity, political corruption, the rise of fascism, grief, child soldiers, analogies about aid-riddled homosexuals targeting children. None of these are topics for a children’s book, let alone one written by a bigoted idiot.
I only made it as far as the first few chapters of book 4. I saw the repeating pattern and realised it wasn’t for me.
I hate this attitude that it’s okay for something to suck if it’s made for children.
I don’t think the books suck. They are suitable for the age group they are intended for. People act like they’re supposed to be great literature or something, though.
It doesn’t matter that they’re unoriginal - the target audience don’t know that. It’s the first time they’ve seen these things, so they feel original to them.
Holllld up. No reason to act like kids don’t deserve media of a higher caliber, or that media created with them in mind can’t be just as enjoyable for adults. Harry Potter is far from my hyperfixation but I can’t stand these arguments no matter where they crop up.
Oh they certainly do. It’s always saddened me that these books are what grabbed the imagination of a generation when Terry Pratchett’s books were right there.
But that said, they did get a lot of kids into reading and I hope they explored further. It feels like a lot just hyper-focused on HP, though.
Everyone expects media, other than their favorite, to be perfect.