NanoooK@sh.itjust.works to France · 1 year ago"Personne n'accepterait aujourd'hui de faire 70 heures par semaine et de ne pas être rémunéré," les boulangers face à la crisefrance3-regions.francetvinfo.frexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up117arrow-down11
arrow-up116arrow-down1external-link"Personne n'accepterait aujourd'hui de faire 70 heures par semaine et de ne pas être rémunéré," les boulangers face à la crisefrance3-regions.francetvinfo.frNanoooK@sh.itjust.works to France · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squaredoublejay1999@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year ago“These days people won’t work 70 hours per week for little money” Is that correct ?
minus-squareBestBoucletteslinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoMore like “Nowadays, nobody would want to work for 70h a week without getting paid.”
minus-squareSnoopylinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoI’m not surekhow to convey the message, the difference is subtle. Correct me if i’m wrong. In fact, the title tells us there is 2 main reasons why people refuse to work in bakery : working 70h per week : overwork a low wage So it’s not : “for little money”, even if it’s well paid (which won’t happen) they will refuse and prioritise their life, familly, friends… You omitted “et/and” so it change a lot the sentence’s meaning. I would translate it to : “70h per week and little wage”
“These days people won’t work 70 hours per week for little money”
Is that correct ?
More like “Nowadays, nobody would want to work for 70h a week without getting paid.”
I’m not surekhow to convey the message, the difference is subtle. Correct me if i’m wrong.
In fact, the title tells us there is 2 main reasons why people refuse to work in bakery :
So it’s not : “for little money”, even if it’s well paid (which won’t happen) they will refuse and prioritise their life, familly, friends…
You omitted “et/and” so it change a lot the sentence’s meaning. I would translate it to : “70h per week and little wage”