I’s heard news that BlueSky has been growing a lot as Xitter becomes worse and worse, but why do people seem to prefer BlueSky? This confuses me because BlueSky does not have any federalization technologies built into it, meaning it’s just another centralized platform, and thus vulnerable to the same things that make modern social media so horrible.

And so, in the hopes of having a better understanding, I’ve come here to ask what problems Mastodon has that keep people from migrating to it and what is BlueSky doing so right that it attracts so many people.

This question is directed to those who have used all three platforms, although others are free to put out their own thoughts.

(To be clear, I’ve never used Xitter, BlueSky or Mastodon. I’m asking specifically so that I don’t have to make an account on each to find out by myself.)


Edit:

Edit2: (changed the wording a bit on the last part of point 1 to make my point clearer.)

From reading the comments, here are what seems to be the main reasons:
  1. Federation is hard

The concept of federation seems to be harder to grasp than tech people expected. As one user pointed out, tech literacy is much less prevalent than tech folk might expect.

On Mastodon, you must pick an instance, for some weird “federation” tech reason, whatever that means; and thanks to that “federation” there are some post you cannot see (due to defederalization). To someone who barely understands what a server is, the complex network of federalization is to much to bare.

BlueSky, on the other hand, is simple: just go to this website, creating an account and Ta Da! Done! No need to understand anything else.

The federalized nature of Mastodon seems to be its biggest flaw.

The unfamiliar and more complex nature of Mastodon’s federalization technology seems to be its biggest obstacle towards achieving mass adoption.

  1. No Algorithm

Mastodon has no algorithm to surface relevant posts, it is just a chronological timeline. Although some prefer this, others don’t and would rather have an algorithm serving them good quality post instead of spending 10h+ curating a subscription feed.

  1. UI and UX

People say that Mastodon (and Lemmy) have HORRIBLE UX, which will surely drive many away from Mastodon. Also, some pointed out that BlueSky’s overall design more closely follows that of Twitter, so BlueSky quite literally looks more like pre-Musk Xitter.

  • Kilamaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    44 minutes ago

    Yhea your first mistake is thinking that 99% give a flying fuck about federation

    It just makes it’s more complex to adopt

    Bluesky ?

    Go on there, sign-up, done

    Everything works.

    Nothing else to do. Nothing to understand.

    • MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      This is the only correct answer.

      It’s easy to get on and it works just like Twitter. People don’t even need to understand what Federation is to get up and running on the platform.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    This confuses me because BlueSky does not have any federalization technologies built into it,

    Bluesky is designed to be federated though. It’s just not fully available yet. Also, Bluesky is open-source, licensed under the MIT license.

  • Blewog@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    I’d say its because less people probably know of mastodon then bluesky, since on Twitter everyone seems to be making a bluesky account but no one a mastodon account which would result in less people knowing about it.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    On Mastodon, you must pick an instance, for some weird “federation” tech reason, whatever that means;

    On email, you must pick a server, for some weird “server” reason, whatever that means;

    It’s literally no different than deciding “should I go with Gmail or hotmail msn yahoo” fuck ok I guess there really is only one email provider now. Huh.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      Yahoo and AOL email are both still around and relatively widely used, and there’s plenty more that aren’t ran by large companies, like FastMail.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Most people don’t know much, and don’t care that they don’t know much. Half of US adults can’t read at a 6th grade level. They don’t care about and probably do not understand complex topics.

    That’s it. They just want cat gifs, and that’s the end of the thought.

    I knew someone who was smart and successful and politically aware. She didn’t care about any of this. She was tired from work and just wanted the familiar ease or twitter. Trying to figure out which server to sign up for and finding content was too much work.

    A lot of people have executive dysfunction. Making a choice is hard.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      I honestly don’t get the whole “picking an instance is hard” thing, especially with masto. “Just use the default instance, mastodon.social, unless you have a reason not to,” bang problem solved. Then it’d become a larger point of failure but if it went down “well now that you sorta understand it make an acct on the server most of your follows were on,” bang 'nother problem solved.

      Hell I have been diagnosed with executive function disorders and I can figure it out, it’s not as hard as people pretend, we’ve all done it with email since like '95. “It’s hard” is just twitter/bluesky propaganda!

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Instead of comparing these smaller platforms together to find out why one is better or not people should be focusing on why xitter and Facebook are still two of the most popular forms of social media.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It’s not just boomers though. I work with a lot of younger people and they all still use xitter/facebook.

        They either don’t know/care about alternatives because “everyone else is using it”

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Bluesky has brand recognition (founded by the same dude as Twitter), more people and “feels like twitter”, in the sense of what you see, more than mastodon. Also, news outlets seem to be migrating there.

    Mastodon (and pleroma, misskey, etc) is seen as a place for weirdos and techies, with “nothing interesting going on”. Several people mentioned this already one way or another, but that most servers/instances are “specific” about whatever means that people will feel that they might miss out on something by choosing the wrong server.

  • 4grams@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    same reason we just elected donald fucking trump. people will always take the easy option that makes them feel good.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Easy.

    1. No one outside of the fediverse bubble gives a fuck about federation. It solves a problem no one has, and offers no real solutions to problems users have.

    2. Mastodon offers nothing on the Twitter experience outside of “but it’s federated”

  • SaltyLemon66@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Bro do you really think common people know all about this open source interconnected stuff. Get out of your linux bubble

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Right, I’m super pro open source but most normal people don’t give a shit. Sure I think those people are stupid, but it doesn’t change reality.

  • Brodysseus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Mainstream tech adoption needs a neat clean wrapper imo. I think that’s the biggest missing piece to fediverse, people want pretty, simple, plug and play.

    If a wrapper like that could be put on top of/combined with all the good qualities that the fediverse offers, I think it would create optimal conditions for slow adoption.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Agreed. There should have been a default place to sign up from the beginning. Leaning on federation as a feature is something very few people care about until they really care about it. The mass adopter just looks at where their favourite celebrity or talking head is and then move there.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        Like Mastodon.social? Afaik it has been around since the beginning and is basically the “default” server unless you’re a “hacker” and you’re on infosec.pub or whatever, an edgy 4channer and you’re on poa.st, a SubGenius on “Bob’s” server dobbs.town, or one of the many pervert servers, or one of the asain servers I can’t read, but if you’re on one of those (for instance dobbs.town) you’re joining dobbs.town and mastodon is just there incidentally. Anyone else can just use .social and call it a day until they find out they’re really into plants.space or some specific thing.

        Hell all the people I’ve gotten on masto that’s how I did it, “Ok make an acct on mastodon.social, great now lemme follow you what’s your name? Cool, see there I am! Oh I’m not on mastodon.social, I’m on dobbs.town, but we can still communicate like how I email your gmail from my protonmail, is normal. Now, there’s some servers you’re gonna want to block…” I don’t even tell them about federation until they’re already there, unless I KNOW the server they’ll want (like when I recommended my Discordian friend hop on discordian.social instead of mastodon.social.)

        The real kicker is that none of their precious celebs they follow are on there, as you mention. The weirdos I talk to don’t care about that so it works out for me lol.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        It’s the raison d’etre. Saying “don’t federate” is like saying “don’t put images and rich hyperlinking on the WWW, just make it like Gopher.” If you don’t want to federate, don’t. But saying that it was a bad move for ActivityPub is just nonsensical.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’m not saying don’t federate. I’m saying don’t talk about that as the primary feature when you’re enticing people to sign up to it.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Mastodon being federated is absolutely not a flaw. This is how the internet was meant to work in the first place. The fact that people got used to using centralized platforms is an aberration and this needs to be actively fought against.

    • prototype_g2@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I should have been more clear. I meant “The federalized nature of Mastodon seems to be its biggest obstacle to it achieving mass adoption”.

      The post was about why Mastodon isn’t receiving as many user as BlueSky, or in other words, why it isn’t achieving mass adoption. It was under this context that I chose to use the word “flaw”, as in, flaw towards reaching mass adoption.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t think there’s a lot of evidence that federation is a significant obstacle in practice. Email is a great example of a federated platform that even the least tech literate people are able to use just fine. It could be argued that Mastodon onboarding process could be smoother, but that’s not an inherent problem with it being federated.

        In my view, the simplest answer is that BlueSky has much better marketing because it has a ton of money behind it and it’s been promoted by Dorsey whom people knew from Twitter. So, when people started abandoning Twitter, they naturally went to the next platform he was promoting.

        I’d also argue that there is a big advantage to having smaller communities of users that focus on specific topics of interest and can federate with each other. In my experience, this creates more engaging and friendlier environment than having all the users on the same server. Growth for the sake of growth is largely meaningless.