• JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    There’s an innumerable number of reasons no one showed up, only one of which is that backwards time travel isn’t possible.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        6 months ago

        The other one is that most people haven’t herd of it, so I doubt the knowledge of this party will travel that far into the future.

        • BossDj@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          45
          ·
          6 months ago

          Someone who put work and effort into developing time travel will have heard of it. Unless it happened after a complete destruction and rebuild of civilization or two.

            • BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              This makes me think of the red dwarf episode where they find a Time Machine 3 million years into deep space, and use it to go back to the 15th century. They get disappointed and think it failed because they are still in deep space, and Kryten says no, it worked, we are now in 15th century deep space.

              They then work out that you need both a Time Machine and an instant space travel machine like the holly hop drive. Especially since everything in the universe is moving.

              And so, like, aliens might very well care but can’t find the right intersection of time and space to actually get there. :)

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 months ago

      We’re in one of the unlucky few possible resulting timelines in which no one showed. My friend from timeline 3f-1933847.12b told me that their party is still going. Every few hours more travelers turn up with a fresh keg, and whatever their generation’s party drug is.

    • lugal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s by far the most plausible but sure, if you ignore Ockham’s razor, sure, it’s only one of many explanations

      • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        More plausible than there being rules around time travel that involve not attending parties? I think not.

        • Malgas@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          One such possibility is that you can only travel to times where the device you’re using to do so exists.

          More like a time gate than an H.G. Wells-style machine, but still a workable model.

        • lugal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Tbf the important question is: assuming that backwards time travel is possible, will people attempt to the party. And there I would say, unlikely. And while I think backwards time travel is very implausible, the experiment itself proves nothing

          • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I thought in your original reply you were saying the most plausible thing was that there must be no time travel. This reply suggests otherwise, which I agree with.

            • lugal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              I still do not believe in time travel so I think the most plausible thing is there is no time travel. But assuming time travel was possible, there would still be no one on the party. This doesn’t prove it but neither do I need any proof

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Exactly, they’d know a lot more accurately what happened too, which raises another point as to why no one comes back here - imagine gong somewhere that you know horrible things are happening to children but you can’t say anything or save them because of the timeline…

        Even if in the unlikely event Hawking didn’t know about it talking to him and not saying ‘that friend of yours epstine is a bad dude’ would be unbearable.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      For example maybe you need a working time machine at your destination, such that the earliest point possible to travel to is the moment the first time machine was switched on.

    • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      News of his attendance at someone else’s party made all future time travelers give him a wide berth.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can you imagine if someone showed up and his party became ground zero for a worldwide pandemic of future diseases for which we don’t have cures yet?

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Hawking gets a Covid sample from a time traveler in 2009 and immediately travels to the Wuhan lab to study it and look for a cure, he successfully delays the pandemic and he almost gets to a cure but a bad guy time traveler comes to kill him in 2018 and without the watchful eye of Stephen Hawking, the world falls to chaos.

      I’d watch that movie.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    6 months ago

    Hawking concluded it is impossible because nobody showed up to his party. Zero thought was spent wondering if it was a party worth showing up to.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, now that I think of it more, I can’t see a single good reason for a time traveler to show up at this party. Going back in time to prove the existence of time travel to the past has a very good chance of handing control of time travel away to people who can undo your existence without you ever being aware of it.

      Even if you just wanted a conversation with one of the brilliant minds in physics, it would be smarter to pick a random lecture or non-time-travel-themed party.

      • Rev3rze@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, or someone did show up despite knowing the risks because they trusted Hawking to understand the dangers of revealing the secret of time travel and not sharing it with any living soul. If time travel were to ever become possible and somewhat commonplace then the chances are probably close to zero that everybody chooses not to attend this party (assuming the invitation remains famous for long enough). Perhaps the party was crowded with people thinking the same way.

        It’s much more likely that it all just played out exactly the way Hawking said it did, of course. But it’s a fun thought experiment to play around with.

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong:

    I live in a timeline where time travel has not yet been invented. Even if someone invents it in the future and travels to the past to the party, that’d create an alternate timeline where the party is attended and civilization leaps bounds ahead in glorious post-scarcity, magical socialism fashion.

    But nooooo since the timeline was forked at that point, no matter how many people do, in fact, attend the party, I’m stuck in the “strand” of the timeline when no one ever did because time travel has not been invented.

    • takeheart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s different ideas on how time travel “could” work and one of them is the timeline-split notion upon which you base your idea. In that vain it’s solid.

      Other ideas are that time travel always results in a loop or that its perhaps only possible under very specific circumstances (ie you can’t pick an arbitrary location or time to travel to nor to travel from).

      My hunch is that even if time travel were possible there’s simply no practical experiment to tell whether you are in a split timeline (and if so how it differs from others), aka it’s outside of the realm of scientific // logical inquiry.

      If y’all like exploration of time travel go watch the show Travelers some time. It has some interesting premises in that regard.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        There is also the Paycheck method. There is no travel you can only observe by looking through a special “time telescope.” Maybe plenty of people observed the party, they just weren’t able to physically attend.

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          First I ever hear of the Paycheck method honestly, at least under that name. Reminds me of a short story about the government keeping a secret “chronoscope” machine and the efforts of the MC to democratize that knowledge.

      • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        There is also the harry potter version, any time travel is woven into the only timeline. The past is “edited” to always have included the events time travel.

        This can be considered similar to the branching method; where the original branch without the events of the time travel simply ends; only the “new” branch continues.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      However, IF, your theory is accurate, then you are the prime instance of you. All time travel alternatives are just YOU in another scenario, not different versions of each other, they are all YOU.

      That’s got to be worth something. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • banana_lama@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Depends on how you see it. It could also be that for some reason or another even with backwards time travel no one shows up. And thus you avoid having a paradox

      Or it could be like a time portal so once you build one you an travel back to any point it existed in but one to a point where it doesn’t exist since you need time travel infrastructure

      • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Or the technology for invisibility arrives before time travel so they were there, just undetected. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

        rips bong

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean, that for the most part makes sense. Although in that case, wouldn’t it have been reported that “no one attended the party but the food and the snacks were somehow missing”?

          That said. Unsure how exactly it went but I read somewhere that if you had the power of True Invisibility, that is being undetectable at any wavelength of light, then you’d basically be able to simulate negative mass, and from there to “time travel” it’s kind of a straight line.

  • MashedTech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    My theory is, time travel is possible but humanity went extinct before we got to that point.

  • atyaz [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 months ago

    It would have been really awkward for everyone involved if someone stumbled into his party by mistake and freaked him out.

  • ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    Perhaps the time travellers came back as catering staff so they could polish it all off without having to engage in human interaction.

  • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I mean when time travel is invented the story will change and we’ll be reading about those visitors. Nobody has shown up at Hawking’s party yet.

    • Shampiss@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s the point though. It doesn’t matter when time travel is invented, only if it can be invented.

      If time travel is possible even 10 000 years in the future someone would almost certainly show up at Hawking’s party since they have a time machine.

      The fact that no one showed up it’s a reasonable argument that time travel is impossible

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s like somebody saying in 1912 that fax machines could never be invented because no printouts were magically appearing on their desk. The technology had to be invented before it could be used. If a time traveler has to step out of a machine, that machine has to be invented first. The idea is that backwards time travel would only be able to travel as far back as the invention of backwards time travel.

        That being said, from a physics standpoint I can absolutely see backwards time travel as being impossible. We can’t move negative distances across spatial dimensions, so why would we be able to move backwards in time?

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s what I think is so neat about time travel. As a rational concept it’s so outlandish and ridiculously unlikely. Everything we know about physics says “Nope.”

          But the concept to the human imagination seems to be such a natural and easy to grasp fantasy.

          Perhaps borne from our desire to fix mistakes, prevent tragedies, and “be in the right place at the right time.”

          On the simplest level we learn best through our mistakes, but wish dearly we could hang on to that knowledge while hitting “Ctrl + Z” on the consequences.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    [off topic]

    “The Big Time” by Fritz Leiber is one of my all time favorite novels. His time travel works on the principle of 'The Law Of Conservation Of Reality." There’s only one timeline, and it’s possible to change it, but it requires a lot of work.

    If you go back and kill baby Hitler, he’ll come back to life and no one will remember anything. It takes vast armies fighting thousands of secret battles to change one thing. But when a Big Change hits, look out!

    • higgsboson@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’ve never read any Fritz Leiber, but he’s cited as a major influence by Zelazny (and Butcher, Donaldson, Stephenson, etc.)

      Maybe today is the day I dig up and start reading Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser.

    • Sconrad122@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      6 months ago

      Pi is an infinite series of non-repeating digits, and yet you will never find the letter A in pi because there is a 0% chance of the letter A being a digit in a decimal system. By the same logic, infinite possibilities do not guarantee that every conceivable state occurs, if that conceivable state has a 0% probability. As finite beings, it is very difficult for us to accurately distinguish between a 0% probability and a infinitesimal probability, so we end up circling back to “we don’t know”

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      That theory suggest that everything that can happen, will — but even then, things that can’t happen, won’t.