I’m not defending Harry Potter, I don’t even like it myself, but Christ that first sentence rubs me the wrong way. Maybe things can be subjective and not every art piece is just “good” or “bad” in the end. There’s no reason to be so passive aggressive and belittling in your response here.
Its morally horrible technically uninteresting creatively uninspired. Sorry, I’ll be more nuanced in my broad thesis statements rather than the main body of my comments. I forget sometimes people only read headlines.
I’m not defending Harry Potter, I don’t even like it myself, but Christ that first sentence rubs me the wrong way. Maybe things can be subjective and not every art piece is just “good” or “bad” in the end. There’s no reason to be so passive aggressive and belittling in your response here.
Its morally horrible technically uninteresting creatively uninspired. Sorry, I’ll be more nuanced in my broad thesis statements rather than the main body of my comments. I forget sometimes people only read headlines.
I read the rest of your comment, you know. The work you’re talking about arguably being shit doesn’t mean you have to be so passive aggressive.
I don’t think I’m being passive. I think I’m being sarcastic and bitter about mother fuckers reading selectively to avoid being communicated with.