kivihiili@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 days agoNO SAFE PPE EXISTS rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square58linkfedilinkarrow-up1164arrow-down10
arrow-up1164arrow-down1imageNO SAFE PPE EXISTS rulelemmy.blahaj.zonekivihiili@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square58linkfedilink
minus-square0x0@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·10 days ago The suit is not intended for use as a bulletproof vest. This is so American
minus-squaresetVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoIs it for resistance to chunks of metal flying off in the case of an explosion?
minus-squareArcanepotato@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·10 days ago The window and suit tested to a V50 of 712 ft/sec with a ballistic threat using a .22″ fragment, and 789 ft/sec with a .308″ fragment. It is an understandable clarification to include.
This is so American
Is it for resistance to chunks of metal flying off in the case of an explosion?
It is an understandable clarification to include.