• zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    Checked wikipedia. I found the following crimes that the church executed people for:

    Being a (crypto) Jew, criticizing the papacy, being an atheist, saying Jesus was from Kongo, witchcraft.

    Anyone else got some crimes to add? I don’t count the local authorities executing someone for whatever a holy book says, but the Catholic/protestant/orthodox church did

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m Christian and have donated to the Satanic Temple.

      Their work strengthening the separation of church and state is excellent, and I fully support it. Separating church and state makes both institutions better.

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    To be historically accurate, the catholic church only liked to kill its popes and other churches. It preferred converting regular people over killing them.

    When it saw regular people killing each other for whatever reason, it only added a repentance tax.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      To be historically accurate, the catholic church only liked to kill its popes and other churches.

      What the fuck is this shit. The church conducted brutal campaigns of terror hunting down religious minorities or those accused of heresy and tortured them to extract confessions which they then used to justify more torture. Jews were frequently criminalized and forced out of countries in mass deportations at their own expense. And then there were, oh yeah, the Crusades military campaigns that brought death and destruction even to their own lands as crusaders looted and pillaged wherever they went, in one case even sacking Constantinople who they were supposed to be protecting.

      Like yeah I guess “Believe everything we say and defer to our authority and we probably won’t kill you” is technically better than just killing people, but that’s not exactly a high bar.

      • lath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        a.k.a.

        other churches

        Only one gang is allowed a monopoly on violence.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If you define everyone you feel like doing violence towards as “an other church” then sure, but then the distinction is completely meaningless. Plenty of the examples I mentioned such as the inquisitions were used against people who were longtime, faithful members of the church. No one was safe.

    • groet@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Except for that one time when they told everyone to go to that place and kill everyone there to claim the land in the name of the lord. And that second time, and third, and fourth…

      … I wanted to make a joke about there having been 10+ crusades but the I realised the wikipedia list of crusades INCLUDES MORE THAN A HUNDRED MILITARY CAMPAINS DIRECTY LED, INITIATED OR SUPPORTED BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH!

    • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      trips over skeleton sticking out of unmarked grave by a residential school

      Ow fuck! These things are everywhere!

    • mmddmm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      The Church was… not very coherent 4 centuries ago.

      Well, just last week there are people that claim to be Catholic publicly praying for the Pope to die. So I guess it’s still incoherent. But it was much more so 4 centuries ago.

      Yes, the Inquisition was created to stop people from killing each other. But there were lots of places where they did the exact opposite of that. Yes, if somebody started a cruzade at that time they would very likely be excomungated, except for the few people that got support instead.

    • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.”

      “Kill them, for the Lord knows those that are his.”

      For some context, this was reportedly said by the papal legate before the massacre of a few thousand Catholics and Christian Cathars. Not only were they fine killing Christians, but the Catholics with them as well.

    • TehBamski@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Too many of the ‘right people’ dying, is bad for religious business. (Make it make sense.)

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    My ass would probably get promoted for charity and then later axed (figurative and literal) for telling people the truth about sexuality, religious differences, politics, science, art, etc.

    Being a priest is all about subtlety and deflection.