DISCLAIMER – I am not planning on smashing the window on an airplane.

  • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    In flight?

    1. Masks would fall down

    2. The crew will start an emergency descent to a breathable altitude

    3. The crew will call a may day and reroute to the nearest suitable airport

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Worth noting that the masks in the cabin aren’t designed to keep you awake. They’re just designed to keep you alive. They’re basically just hydrogen peroxide and a catalyst, which mixes when you pull the mask down. The resulting chemical reaction produces a small amount of oxygen for a short time. This is also why the instructions say to put your own mask on before helping any children; You only have 15-30 seconds of usable consciousness before you pass out, so you need the mask to stay awake long enough to help anyone else. The pilots are the only ones who actually have masks good enough to stay awake, and that’s why they immediately dive to a breathable altitude.

      Also, the entire cabin would immediately fog from the sudden pressure and temperature change. We’re talking “can’t even see your fingertips when your arm is outstretched” levels of fog.

      And while we’re talking about it, the cabin would suddenly be cold. Like absolutely fucking freezing.

      Lastly, your ears will painfully pop, and will likely ring for a while afterwards. The sudden pressure change will feel like you got slapped on the ears.

      • ArtieShaw@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 days ago

        masks in the cabin aren’t designed to keep you awake. They’re just designed to keep you alive.

        In that situation I’m perfectly fine with that. More than perfectly fine, in fact. Sounds like a feature I’d pay extra for (don’t tell United).

      • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Tell me more about this immediate fog thing, what causes it and what doesn’t it clear quickly?

        edit: Wait the masks only produce oxygen for 30s or the breathable oxygen at that altitude is only available for ~30s?

        • Enoril
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          it’s usually -40°c outside when you are in cruise altitude. Open your home window when it’s freezing outside (less than 0°c) can give you an idea why you would have fog in the aircraft until its complete decompression.

          The mask can produce “oxygen” for about 15 to 20 min max. You have to be below 10000 feets to be “ok” without mask (it will be like being in a montain at high altitude).

          Without putting the mask, you loose conciousness in about 30sec.

          Note: this scenario is the worse in term of decompression event. Usually this type of failure would happen during the ascent.

            • Enoril
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              i don’t think its possible (but i’m not an expert on that) due to the sudden differential of pressure you encounter. I assume it’s like being punched.

              Best is to react quickly for yourself, then look and help the people around you…

              If plane go quickly under 10000 feets, the unconscious people will wake-up (normally)

    • valkyre09@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s exactly what I want in a situation like that, the crew to respond like it’s any other Tuesday.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Worth pointing out that it is highly unlikely for an airplane window to either smash or pop out — they’re multi-layered Lexan reinforced panes mounted from the inside. And they’ve all got a hole on the inside pane so that a controlled decompression with a loud whistling would happen long before the entire pane would give way. This would likely provide time for the masks to drop and the pilot to adjust altitude long before any explosive decompression (if that even occurred).

    Likewise, doors are designed not to open at altitude.

    So the only weak spots these days are door plugs and the bathrooms.

    • TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Pedant, but the pressure difference between 1 atmosphere and zero isn’t all that great, so explosive decompression wouldn’t happen even in the worst case scenario. Rapid yes, explosive no.

      To be explosive you need something like the Byford Dolphin diving bell incident, which was 9 atmospheres to 1 in a fraction of a second.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      out of personal curiosity, why is the bathroom concidered a weak point? I understand the door plug but I figured the bathroom is a locked down area

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It depends very much on the height.

    If we assume a jet flight at around 30.000 feet:

    The cabin pressure goes down immediately, that means, a very strong wind goes out of this open window. Several eardrums burst. (Stupid people panic and cry). Afterwards people cannot breathe normally because of the low pressure… They need these air masks.

    Then the pilot descends immediately to something like 5.000 feet - I don’t know exactly - where everybody can breathe normally again.

    And then you land at the next airport.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Stupid people panic and cry

      I’m not sure I’d call it STUPID to panic when something extremely scary happens to you…

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I mean, I wouldn’t exactly call it smart either. Panic is pretty useless in situations where flight is not an option (in the flight or fight sense … but it makes for a good pun too).

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I wouldn’t call it smart either but to look down on someone who freaks out when an airplane window blows out seems a bit much lol

          • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            3 days ago

            No. Wrong.

            It is clear and simple in that order of events that we are describing here: the ones who panic and the ones who don’t. And so I describe them with clear and simple words. That other guy who always looks for some grey areas in between and then makes lots of buts and long winding arguments, he is just not there. No time for him, no place for him.

            He maybe comes afterwards, when all is over and I don’t care anymore, and that’s what I do with you now.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              Oh ok you’re right it is binary. I now understand that if you are stupid if you aren’t 100% calm during a very stressful situation. Thank you for the explanation.

    • Skunk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Standard procedure is max FL100 or 10 000 ft.

      But if you are flying over mountains (FL180 for the Alps highest safe flight level) you are fucked.

      Well no, there are oxygen masks and the pilots will immediately put them on and then dive toward a safer altitude at a controlled but fast rate of descent (more eardrums bursts) as well as clearing the high terrain area ASAP.

      Airbus Procedure is basically “Pull everything on the MCP !”:

      • masks on for both pilots,
      • checks interphone com with your Captain/FO.
      • On the MCP, autopilot set altitude to max FL100 or below (above if mountains), pull for open descent,
      • pull for HDG and go off track (outside the airway to avoid collisions).
      • Pull for max Speed or appropriate (not in managed mode anymore, this will change your rate of descent).
      • Speedbrakes max.
      • Transponder 7700
      • Then you can call Mayday on radio.
      • You also check that the masks had been automatically lowered in the cabin at that point.

      And A320 should descent at around 7000ft per minute. At that rate you start to feel that the ground is getting perpendicular to you on the window. Could be more or less, it’s the pilot choice and how much he is willing to stress an airframe that just had an explosive decompression.

      Rapid decompressions are very rare events tho. Except maybe on 737 max.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    DISCLAIMER – I am not planning on smashing the window on an airplane.

    That’s what someone who plans on smashing the window on a plane would say.

    • nuez_jr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      Absolutely won’t be taking off on that plane; it’s not going to be a 30-minute Safelite AeroGlass™️ appointment. And airlines don’t keep planes sitting around not making money so they won’t have a spare aircraft available to fly that route so all the passengers will likely get hotel and meal vouchers and changed tickets for the next day.

      • ArtieShaw@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        hotel and meal vouchers

        In the US? Not in the past decade. I usually get a link to an app that’s like shitty Expedia for local hotels. You can race to compete for rooms with other stranded passengers while your partner tries to re-book the flight for the next day. “I’m sorry - all flights are full until next Tuesday. We can put you on standby, but there’s a list of people ahead of you.”

        This probably goes hand in hand with the trend of providing sleepable bench seating in airports. For awhile they were doing the anti-homeless park bench design. You’ll have to fight your fellow passengers for space, but it’s better than the floor at DIA or ORD.

        • nuez_jr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          My whole family got a hotel when our delayed plane made us miss a connection and that was five years back.

          I don’t fly much and sleepable benches helps me feel like that’s the right thing to not do.

  • litchralee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’m assuming your question pertains to a window failure while still on the airport grounds prior to takeoff. If instead you meant a window failure while at cruise, I would suggest this Mentour Pilot video about Southwest Flight 1380 where an engine defect threw shrapnel at one of the cabin windows, smashing it open with disastrous effects.

    Supposing the window failed prior to opening the jet bridge to allow passengers to board, it probably would have been noticed by the flight crew – ie the pilots, cabin staff – while doing their preflight preparations and checks, or by the ground crew, while loading baggage or food/supplies. Once notified, the boarding process would be delayed as the pilots assess whether the flight can continue – definitely not – and then the captain would use their authority to reject the aircraft for that flight, calling in the maintenance team and the airline so they can take the next steps. Practically speaking, this flight will be either heavily delayed or outright cancelled.

    If instead the window failed after closing the doors and the aircraft has started taxiing to the runway, then there are some complications. With everyone seated for taxiing, passengers are not supposed to start walking around to notify the cabin crew. But the cabin crew may already be walking the aisles to check for stowed trays, seatbelts for takeoff, baggage obstructions, etc. So if they see a smashed window, that’s an obvious sign that the cabin is not secured for takeoff. At the end of the cabin checks, the cabin crew would normally telephone the pilots to convey a secure cabin. Here, they would explain the situation and the pilots would contact ground control to return back to the terminal.

    But supposing the window broke after the cabin was declared secure, and the aircraft is about to line up onto the runway. In this case, everyone including the cabin crew are sat down, so a passenger who sees the window can’t really get the cabin crew’s attention by pressing the overhead button. Barring some sort of additional malfunction that the pilots could notice – like a major engine malfunction – this aircraft might actually take off.

    When taxiing, the pilots have a number of things to do, and so the “sterile cockpit” rule means that no non-operational chitchat is allowed, to allow them to focus. Mentour Pilot has other videos on what happens when the rule is violated. Likewise, the cabin crew are trained to not disturb the pilots unless something absolutely flight endangering is happening, at least for the first few thousand feet of takeoff climb.

    The theory is as follows: if an aircraft is on the ground and stationary, it is safe. If the aircraft is at cruising altitude and cruising speed, it is safe. But if it’s at low altitude (<1000 ft; 330 m), then it’s very easy for the flight to go sour. Hence, once an aircraft has reached a certain point in taxiing, it will basically want to take off. And we still have the problem that the pilots don’t even know the window broke.

    So the aircraft rolls down the runway and takes off. Crisis? Not really. The plane will climb quickly up to some 3000-5000 ft, at which point the plane is configured for a steady climb to cruise. This is when the pressurization system would engage, since cabins need to keep the pressure to a breathable level. Although the system may also have noticed that the cabin pressure stayed the same as the outside air pressure for the entire climb. That’s a clear sign of a cabin air leak, and the system would indicate to the pilots of a pressurization failure.

    This is the first indicator for the pilots, although at this stage in the flight, the cabin crew may also phone the pilots since they start walking around earlier than 10,000 ft altitude. A pressurization failure or broken window means the pilots must halt their climb and remain below 10,000 ft, which is the upper limit for human breathing without supplemental oxygen. The pilots would radio to ATC and request a return to the airport, or another nearby airport if need be. A pan-pan or mayday could be declared, depending on the captain’s assessment of the situation, or to obtain priority over any other aircraft wanting to land.

    The last scenario before the Flight 1380 scenario is if the window broke just as the aircraft was passing 10,000 ft altitude, so there was no earlier indication of a cabin leak. In this case, there will indeed be a cabin depressurization, although it won’t be as severe as at cruise altitude. Some aircraft will automatically drop the oxygen masks, and the pilots will don their own masks, now cognizant that a full-blown emergency is underway. This is handled the same way: bring the aircraft down to a breathable altitude and call ATC. The oxygen masks are good for some 20 minutes, which is well more than enough time to return to a lower altitude and make a plan.

    TL;DR: the entirety of Mentour Pilot’s YouTube back catalog truly sheds light on how the aviation industry keeps people safe. I highly recommend.

    • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      safe. But if it’s at low altitude (<1000 ft; 330 m), then it’s very easy for the flight to go sour.

      When I talk about paragliding, normal people are weirded out when I tell that I am safer 1000m agl than 30m AGL. But we call the 5-50m aglthe death zone. If shit hits the fan, I have no time to react nor to pull the reserve. Lower, helmet and airbag would limit the damage,higher I can try something, but at low height you don’t have much time to react and need to be 100% focused

      • litchralee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m only a passive yet very interested observer of aviation but am also a fairly avid cyclist. I think the equivalent analog for bikes is that it’s much easier to track a straight line when doing 50 kph than at 5 kph. Just like airspeed is needed for rudder surfaces to work, cyclists need speed to maintain horizontal balance and manoruverability.

        • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Dude… I’ve gone pretty fast down some hills. It feels way safer to be going real slow and fall over than going 50 mph downhill on a road bike in a nice straight line.

          • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Dude… I’ve gone pretty fast down some hills. It feels way safer to be going real slow and fall over than going 50 mph downhill on a road bike in a nice straight line.

            FWIW, 50kph is 31mph, not 50mph.

            I frequently bike around 28mph (45kph), cause that’s where my eBike maxes out its pedal assist. It’s not so bad, assuming your gearing is set up so that you aren’t pedaling so hard it destabilizes the bike (I had to swap in a larger chainring to safely maintain those speeds).

            But also the comparison isn’t whether it’s safer, it’s whether it’s more stable. A bike going fast is more stable than a bike going slow because the motion of the bike keeps itself upright. It’s not a perfect analogy for gliding, but it’s similar enough to help understand. What may seem to someone inexperienced to be the less-ideal condition is actually more ideal.

            • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              31 mph is not too bad, but at higher speeds you start facing safety risks and instabilities of different kinds besides just falling over. Going downhill very fast on a road bike is not a super stable configuration. You can slip on turns, lose control on bumps, hit something you didn’t have reaction time for, etc.

              I think planes have this too where they’re safer at higher altitudes, except not too high beyond what they’re rated for and have other instabilities from that

    • aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      if they see a smashed window, that’s an obvious sign that the cabin is not secured for takeoff

      lmao!

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    At what point in time? If the aircraft is still on the ground, it wouldn’t take off in that condition, i.e. you would be ordered to leave it again and need to take a different one. The explanation by @NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world is, I think, correct for what would happen if that happened during the flight.

  • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s a YouTube video on one time this happened and a woman was sucked out of the window partially and ended up passing away as a result. She was seated directly beside that window when this happened and others were trying to pull her in. The plane took an emergency action to land as soon as possible. She didn’t completely exit the window, but was partially out of the window.

    Sorry I didn’t give you a story with a nicer ending, but just know that this is rare and doesn’t happen often. The odds of this happening are almost similar to winning the lottery. People are scared of flying, in general, but you’re generally safer in the air than in a car, statistically speaking for something to happen.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    It would suck stuff out, the oxygen masks would drop, they’d land the plane