• vxx@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I guess the question has so be raised how four people died in a car that didn’t roll over.

      The good thing is that Tesla has the records and will release them without issues…

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Pretty much all forms of vehicle transport is unsafe. This is why electric cars should be thought of as: good but not ideal.

  • WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Hmmm I wonder if a vehicle filled with flammable explodey-gas who just drove over 2 metal signs at high speed would be on fire as well? Would it have gotten the attention that this vehicle had, given that ICE cars burn many times more often than EV’s do.

    It is a tragedy and should be investigated but these articles have to get off the “It’s new so it’s bad” bandwagon until the investigators come in. It could have been a flat tire at high speeds that sent the car onto that shoulder and over those signs. There is uneven wear on the tires so on the outside of Regenerative Breaking EV’s tires look almost new on the outside but trashed on the inside. If it blew because of that, or some nail on the road then there is no fault on Tesla and the man-boy who runs it. If however say steering went or the airbag randomly went off when the car was at speed my least favourite Martian and Tesla would be culpable.

    Until then turn the sensationalism on your stories down to 11.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      no, it wouldn’t. Because the car is not filled with aerosolized explodey-gas, but just flammable liquid contained in a robust tank. it is not explosive. It can catch fire, but not simply from impact. You’d need a hole in the tank lower than the current fuel level and an external ignition source. Even if you shoot the gas tank directly, it will not explode. It is physically impossible for it to explode.

      Puncture one of an electric car’s cells, and it sets off a chain reaction. The whole car very quickly goes up in flames.

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        “Robust”? Clearly you’ve never driven an itlian made car!

        Alphas tanks are literally made out of plastic. You can poke them with a basic screwdriver.

        Yeah it won’t go boom, but point being, they’re not robust and go in flames fairly often too…

    • vxx@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      I’m a fan of EVs, but Tesla lacks security safety and I’m not a fan of it.

      It’s too complicated to leave the car when power is off for example.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Yep. That’s my issue. It’s not the fire, it’s that it’s really hard to get out in a disaster.

        The Tesla could just have easily killed four if it crashed into water.

        • Paddzr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          You mean, the mechanical handle present? I’m not sure if older cars over a decade ago didn’t have em, but my model 3 has mechanical release on every hinged part. Even the drunk, which no human being would even fit in (I think, I guess a toddler might?).

          • Vanon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Do you think the average Tesla driver knows about these? Are they easy to find and use in an emergency? Could they be easily improved?

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        If I recall correctly, the manual override for the electric inner door handle is hidden under some panel. Major lawsuit material if you ask me, and irresponsible by the certifying authorities,

        • socsa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          FWIW, pretty much every car on the road actually has a switch which completely disables the inside rear door latch.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You recall wrongly. It’s totally exposed, available all the time. Lots of people who are new actually activate it instead of the button that lowers the window before opening.

          • vxx@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            And the passengers on the back seats?

            That’s Model 3 from the article.

            And Cybertruck:

            On BMW you pull the door handle twice

    • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      If I made a metal cage for rich people that locked and set on fire, I would go to prison for life probably. This guy does that and sells it to them

    • thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Some reasons why they probably would be fine in a normal car

      1. Central computer controls everything. A crashing computer means a crashing car

      2. Electronic door locks. When you crash youre going to have a hard time opening the door

      3. Shatterproof windows mean if your door won’t open, you’re BBQ

      • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        the second point shouldn’t be true, the handles of the front doors should mechanically unlock the door as they are opened. the sub-humans in the back blew what they were getting into.

  • hemmes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tesla, founded by the billionaire CEO Elon Musk, has frequently faced scrutiny over safety issues.

    That is incorrect

  • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It was Saturday evening around 10pm, three restaurant employees went into one of the client car to “try it out”, the client (65 years old) was clearly speeding, lost control of the vehicle, left the road and hit a traffic sign.

    My bet is that all of that has nothing to do with the fact that this was a Tesla, the only difference is the fire but this is the same for every electric vehicle.

  • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’m halfway through rewatching Demolition Man as of yesterday evening. Simon Phoenix blew up the capacitance gel in a car using one of the cop’s electrical night sticks. I can only assume that Musk is now going to unfreeze John Spartan to deal with these crimes.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    According to preliminary reports, the vehicle rammed into several road signs at high speed.

    Place your bet. 1.5x reward for people placing bet on faulty "F"SD.

    Edit: so FSD is off the bet.