Waryle

Most instances will stop allowing new accounts to be created when it reaches a certain size that gets difficult to manage (hardware and moderating-wise). They self-regulate that way, and instances that get out of control will just be defederated by the others.

I liked the thought that if I were to lose my phone while traveling, I could just borrow a computer and access all my accounts anyway and not getting very uncomfortably stuck. This is putting me at big risk there.

ZFS Raid Expansion has been released days ago in OpenZFS 2.3.0 : https://www.cyberciti.biz/linux-news/zfs-raidz-expansion-finally-here-in-version-2-3-0/

It might help you with deciding how much storage you want

Non, c’est refuser de s’habiller correctement quand les températures baissent pour préférer cramer de l’énergie pour chauffer des m³ d’air qui est déraisonnable. Ça me fait penser à mes collègues au bureau qui refusent de quitter leur costard tout à fait optionnel et qui blindent la clim en été.

En France, on a encore 2/3 de notre consommation énergétique à décarboner et donc à électrifier massivement. Vu que nos politiques ont bien merdé sur la question du nucléaire, et que l’intermittence des EnRs n’a pas de solution viable, on va bien devoir passer par une réduction de notre consommation. Mais ça, on n’est pas près d’y arriver si on ne réduit pas l’un des plus grands postes de consommation électrique du pays, juste parce que les gens ne veulent pas mettre de pulls.

19 degrés c’est même trop chaud pour une chambre, je ne chauffe même pas la mienne et je dors à 16-17, je mets une grosse couette et parfois un plaid chauffant. et j’ai amplement chaud.

Mais c’est agréable pour vous de se sur-couvrir dans votre propre maison?!

Nouvel exemple des ravages de la société de consommation : considérer que s’habiller en fonction de la température ambiante est anormal.

Mettre autre chose que des vêtements d’automne et de printemps en coton pour affronter la fin de l’automne et l’hiver, c’est pas se sur-couvrir, c’est juste normal. Cramer des quantités astronomiques d’énergie pour surchauffer une maison c’est une aberration.

Macron is turbo economical liberalism, and he does everything he can to not be affiliated with the left.

He even dissolved the Assemblée Nationale (our Parliament), and when a left-wing coalition came out on top, which should have secured them the prime minister’s seat, Macron delayed the appointment for months trying to buy time for the right to secure an agreement with the far right, and ended up choosing a prime minister from a right-wing party who did had only 7% of votes.

yes, lower even than an analogue bike, because the electric motor is more carbon efficient than human muscle power which requires eating more.

Everytime I saw this claim, it ended up being bullshit. What’s your source?

They don’t

That’s not brain drain. Brain drain is when high qualified people leave their country, mostly because of the lack of infrastructures costing them opportunities for studying or working in their respective field.

What you’re talking about is capital flight. This is an issue that is systematically raised as a counter-argument by liberals in debates on taxation. The problem is that it is seriously overestimated:

• Leaving a country is a lot more complicated than it sounds: you lose your family, your friends, your culture, your habits. Many millionaires who leave their country end up coming back after a few years.
• You can’t relocate your real estate investments.
• Going abroad doesn’t exempt you from paying taxes (especially exit taxes).
• A country that wishes to do so can prohibit the relocation of a profitable company, or even nationalize it.
• Many rich people who threaten to leave if taxes are raised end up doing the math: if there’s a profitable business, they’ll stay. And in a country that finances its infrastructure soundly and has a good distribution of wealth, there’s profitable business to be had.

While true, how is that any different to the arguments that were used for TV?

Television is bad because it is a passive activity, but it is less harmful than the continuous ingestion of micro-videos. But I don’t see what it has to do here.

Additionally, Lemmy is a social network in the same way that Reddit is. Is this not also dangerous?

What’s the connection? I didn’t mention Reddit.

As has been the recommendation for practically everything for the four decades I’ve been on this earth, moderation is key. Instead of hating new media, either regulate it (if the evidence is truly that great) or treat it with healthy moderation.

This would be to ignore the particularly addictive nature of this kind of content. It would be like comparing apples to Snickers: both are sweet, yes, but one is much more problematic.

Let’s be blunt here. Most of the people in this thread aren’t worried about health

That could be a point, but I’m pretty sure that if you ask anybody, the main reason given would be that it makes you stupid. But I can agree that this opinion would not necessarily be based on anything other than the eternal contempt for novelty as video games or manga were, for example, before they became popular.

ITT: People in their mid-twenties or later, who feel superior to those that like one form of media over their preferred media.

You’re just waving away an important fact, which is that shorts and their equivalents are notoriously known for killing attention spans and disrupting the management of dopamine in the brain, causing depression in particular.

We are no longer simply in the traditional custom of the elderly who despise the activities of the younger generations, we are talking about health.

Hexgears and of course lemmygrad.ml are of the same kind

Ah bah moi je suis dispo pour aider jusqu’à dimanche 10h, après c’est brunch…

Et sinon ça se passerait comment ? Y a moyen d’importer/migrer les données de jlai.lu de Lemmy vers un autre soft basé sur ActivityPub, ou est-ce qu’on part sur un bon gros reset total ?

Personnellement, je n’ai pas attendu qu’Elon Musk débloque des comptes de nazis et censure les idées contraires à l’extrême droite pour supprimer mon compte Twitter. Je connaissais la merde que c’est, alors j’ai arrêté d’utiliser son produit et de le soutenir indirectement.

Dans le cas de Lemmy, son développement tourne avec des dons, et je refuse de leur donner de la thune, et je refuse de donner des raisons pour que d’autres leur donnent de la thune.

Compte tenu du bordel que les utilisateurs d’Hexgears ont foutu dans l’autre thread, et de la longue liste d’insanités exposée ici, je vais reprendre mon commentaire et le corriger :

Perso leur instance était déjà bloquée sur mon compte. Je les vois comme un 18-25 de JVC mais à gauche et international, les discussions ne volent jamais haut.

Malheureusement, je vois sur ce post que bloquer l’instance dans les paramètres ne permet pas d’échapper à leurs commentaires. mais bon, jusqu’ici ça ne m’avait pas gêné, donc je ne suis pas spécialement pour les défédérer.

Il faut bloquer ces dégénérés. Et au vu des immondices proférées par l’équipe principale de dev de Lemmy, je suis dégoûté de leur avoir filé des thunes et j’approuverais totalement une hypothétique migration de jlai.lu vers un soft alternatif.

Perso leur instance était déjà bloquée sur mon compte. Je les vois comme un 18-25 de JVC mais à gauche et international, les discussions ne volent jamais haut.

Malheureusement, je vois sur ce post que bloquer l’instance dans les paramètres ne permet pas d’échapper à leurs commentaires, mais bon, jusqu’ici ça ne m’avait pas gêné, donc je ne suis pas spécialement pour les défédérer.

I can shit inside a car and make it unbearable for everyone, that does not make me the one who controls the car.

There is a colossal difference between “the government CONTROLS the weather” and “the government participates in climate change”

• Those are tires, not wheels.
• 35% which uses them means that 65% don’t use them.
• You said “no matter gear you have”, so you can’t use that point.
• With 20cm of fresh snow, even a normal car would be stuck. But if you tell me that you use a special car (a pick-up for example), I will argue that you can use a special bike (such as a fat bike) and roll with it without problem.

And we could save a lot of people if they put on helmets to walk down stairs, and yet I don’t see anyone saying that people are stupid not to wear them.

And your friend, if he drives at 30mph, of course he has to wear a helmet, but the subject is not a sporty practice of cycling, but bike commuting. And helmets does not protect you from a shitty infrastructure and tank-like cars that run you over, so maybe it would be good to stop insulting people and bring some nuance to this debate.