Et Jdg qui disait que le jeu serait mort au bout de deux mois. Pire take de streamer de 2025.

10 millions de raiders! Yeah!

No stitcher nerf :(

How can you type with those big wolf paws?

I think you can do a memtest with Windows included tool that doesn’t require to install anything. Type memory check or something in the Start menu and the system should require a restart to boot on the memtest.

But obviously setting up a dedicated thumb drive can be useful too.

When I need to trial in peace, I spam Stella Montis raids focusing on Medical Research and lobby I bring literally no loadout or just a ferro 1 and some ammo. I focus on gathering blueprints and can’t shoot back anyway. In 3/4 raids like that you should have very friendly lobbies.

May you trials go smoothly!

Time to craft some seeker grenades for those rocketeer’s!

Also I think there is a special blueprint that drops on hidden bunker but maybe I’m confusing it to locked gate. Is it the bobcat blueprint?

Also why exactly 4 liters? Do people think our bodies only accept exact amount of fluids?

Yeah…

Seems like a real picture but with a strong AI filler.

OK, i agree that party size should count on the decision but i also understand that this is suppose to evaluate the aggressiveness of a player. Since you play very differently solo and trio you probably assume everybody does.

There is some truth IMO on saying that many aggressive players will be just the same irrelevant of party size. The more chill solo is something that appeared organically because people wanted at least one safe space. But it’s not really a rule or anything official. I personally wish I could play trios in a more peaceful manner so I agree the change you suggest might help. But also people that are aggressive will often be on any modes anyway. I find hard to believe the extract campers in trios would suddenly be any different when they play solo…

Also in trios the matchmaking has to assess the aggressiveness of three players and find and adequate lobby with other similarly aggressive teams. So it’s not as simple as having three hidden MMR aggressiveness because I think people tend to naturally be more aggressive in groups. So a group of mildly aggressive players can be a very aggressive group when they free loadout on stella montis ;)

By spreading I meant thar if there is an underlying manufacturing defect it would be really difficult to predict where and when it would happen on memory. And if there is already a fault detected more might come later.

But I’m glad you documented how to do these types of workaround. It might be helpful with memory prices skyrocketing…

I disagree.

Solo players should be able to play PvP if they wish to do so.

That system naturally match PvP vs PvP and PvE vs PvE.

It lets anyone play any mode the way they want to*.

*: assuming you are patient enough for the matchmaker to adjust

I get that you are saying but :

• You can play a few games of trio free loadout until things call down. Sure, you will have to endure pretty much litteraly destroy you and your team… But you should get quite quickly to friendlier lobbies.

In any case IMO you can change from aggro to friendly lobby in about 4 raids so it’s not like a really big issue.

Basically if I do PvP in a session with friends, I will do a few pacifist free loadouts in solo beforehand and that seems to be enough.

The way I see it, it accounts for the damage you do to Arc and other players yo push the matchmaker one way or another.

I didn’t try any of the “Throw snowballs at X” trials.

I hope it’s not too complicated to max out. I probably can do it with a freeloadout anyway.

Very cool to be able to do that even though I’m not sure it’s worth it to run a RAM module that has a known defect.

If the fault spreads there will be corruption again.

My instance of choice decided to unilaterally and without any warning whatsoever disable downvotes. Just to “try it out”.

I’m still pissed about it to this day.

I mean that google removes any kind of downvotes is one stupid thing, but that people think this makes content “better” is crazy to me.

Now I do understand that in small communities the weight of a super negative account can be quite an issue… But is removing completely any negative feedback the solution ? Really, it’s all we got ?

Also the simple fact that a lot of this community is from Reddit, IMO it’s not okay to disable a feature like that without even voting on it.

So if you think disabling negative feedback fixes an issue, you have the burden to prove or at least explain the reasoning.

I do think it didn’t make YouTube any less of a cesspool to disable downvotes on it…

Edit : Also while votes are not supposed to replace moderation, they certainly help limiting the reach of spammers. Like if the mods are asleep at least the community can bury the post in the meantime. But no, they just disabled downvotes and made a post about the change the same day. Wtf.

I would say it doesn’t exactly say that AI is bad moreso that shoving it forcefully in people’s throat is not the way to do it.

If all the BS AI of Windows would be exclusively opt-in I would be “” fine"" with it.

Then there is also the “telemetry” and the random updates, or settings changing on their own and…

Anybody got the feeling some games may be negatively affected by a PiHole ?

It’d not really the reason I stopped using it but I suspected that some games didn’t like it when PiHole was up…

Anyway this post motivated me to reinstall my RasPi.

Not the spam sheep post…

Face a ce véritable torrent de statistiques et d’études qu’est ton commentaire, qui ne pourrait être convaincu ?

LOL I immediately thought about Spotify when reading the question.

Spotify was once an ultra fast app. Now it takes 15 seconds from launching the app to starting your music.

What I find funny is that Spotify used to be super fast at the inception of the service.

I would say there is some truth to what he says :

https://www.sektion-landwirtschaft.org/en/news/artificial-sweeteners-create-deceptive-sweetness

Although it’s not like a definitive answer from the scientific community.

Is it a key difference though ?

If you exploit people that has only one choice : Taking whatever shit job they can… Barely paid enough to survive. They are not slave per se but their boss couldn’t be happier to have cheap labor that has no leverage whatsoever and would accept anything anyway. It is farming desperation.

To some extent I think some big business are borderline slave owners even though you could say all their slaves could leave their job and die from hunger if they wish to do so. They could voluntarily choose death over basically being owned by another human but surprisingly enough most dont do that.