It seems like a nice idea: a place to point people to when they claim “no one writes without AI”. Now we can say: “here’s a great big list of people who do”,

    • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I used to work with a guy who was so afraid of losing the use of his hands in “a freak tractor accident” that he claims to have taught himself to type with his feet.

  • son_of_darkness@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can we not change the name of what we do? It’s not handcrafted coding, it’s coding. The other variant is vibecoding.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Vibe coding is when you don’t do any of it yourself or understand what’s happening.

      If you just use e.g the autocomplete tools in your IDE, or occasionally prompt the AI to generate test cases for you, that’s not really vibe coding, but it should be enough that you shouldn’t be on this list.

  • ell1e@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Kind of funny (or sad?) that lemmy itself probably wouldn’t make it on the list, given they seem adamant on allowing LLM coding: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-docs/pull/414/changes

    Curiously enough I wasn’t able to actually find any lemmy commit marked as created with the help of AI, other than some bug located by AI without indication that an AI fix was used. I wonder if that means either they don’t adhere to their own rule, or whether they’re not actually using AI but just felt like really being pro-AI anyway. Why though? I’m so curious.

    Update: seems like they don’t put it into the commit log, just the merge request info: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pull/6304

    • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well I’m not the site maintainer, but I’d argue that this would be fine. The question is about whether you’re writing the code yourself: understanding what you’re writing line by line rather than taking an “agent” to do the work, robbing you of that understanding.

      Accepting criticism/review from a bot or a human for that matter wouldn’t interfere with that understanding, so I’d argue that it doesn’t apply.

      There is however the ethical question of paying for such a bot, given that it’s the product of massive IP theft and environmental arson. It probably doesn’t apply to this specific declaration though.

      • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        One does not need to pay to use those LLM bots to be unethical. You pay by letting it examine your code.

    • SqueakyBeaver@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      If anything the AI companies would probably use it to know which code to scrape since the models tend to collapse when trained on their own output

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    👋 If you would like to add your name to the directory, here’s how to do it!

    1. Edit this file in your own fork.
    2. Submit the edit as a PR. In the description of the PR, supply some sort of social or technical proof that you have authored handcrafted code and it is currently in production. “In production” can mean either an app/service that people in public are using, or software module(s) being used by other publicly known software (aka an open source library).
    3. We will review your submission and, if it looks legit, we will publish it on handcraftedcode.org!
    • expr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sounds interesting but I’m not sure I can provide proof. I work on closed source software for a company and don’t really have any online presence outside of this account.

      I do everything the normal way (no LLMs) and am probably the only person left at my company doing so.

      • ell1e@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Perhaps submit yourself anyway and just put that explanation into the pull request. I don’t think the list is designed to be super bullet proof, I was merged without directly linking any code too (although I suppose it’s not too hard to find). At the end of the day, a lot of the internet runs on the honor system still, for better and for worse.

    • Zos_Kia
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sounds complicated, I’ll ask Claude to do it for me 👌

    • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      “Sucking at something is there first step toward being really good at something!” – Jake the Dog