Apparently there will be some boycott of PS in regards of decision to discontinue disks.

From 23 to 30 of August.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 days ago

    I never understood these. Then the week after y’all will come back business as usual. How does it actually affect anything?

    I owned a ps3. Last one I’ve owned. That’s how you do it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      How does it actually affect anything?

      It gives certain social influencers a soapbox from which they can shout “Like, Subscribe, and Share!”

      Modern day “boycotts” aren’t really economic actions. They’re media stunts advanced by affinity marketing groups intended to collect personal information and demonstrate their ability to mobilize large numbers of people.

    • zqps@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Agreed on the last part. But a less cynical take: Companies like Sony obsessively track their sales metrics. If a campaign like this does go viral, and only a few percent of people actually follow through, it does create a noticeable dip in the metrics and an explanation will be demanded internally. There’s a small chance this makes certain managers a bit more careful about such decisions.

      In rare cases companies have taken back or at least delayed similar moves, and they never do so without indication that it will indeed affect their bottom line.

      Though I don’t think this campaign will have much effect, since asking for a full week is not something many people will follow through with. Also Sony is clearly banking on the fact that customers will stay due to lock-in to their ecosystem.

    • BurgerBaron@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yep. The hill my new console owning habits died on was any corp pushing paying to play online subscriptions and I stuck to that. I’ll buy used later if there’s exclusives I want and I can’t just emulate it like Switch 1.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah I went from Sega to ps3 to switch 1 to nothing. But I’ve always owned a PC.

        I still really want to play bloodborne, the emulation was rough when I tried it last, but I’m not gonna buy a ps4 just for one game.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    just a week?

    the sentiment is nice, but those are rookie numbers. gotta pump it up to at least a month or three.

    director boards don’t care unless the quarter looks bad.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I would be absolutely floored of enough people were on board to even make a noticable difference for just one week. Boycotts in the gaming space have been hilariously ineffectual, historically.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Push for laws that force digital stores to provide full ownership of digital rights.

    The ability to pass purchased licenses from one account to another would be a real game changer.

    They’re trying to kill ownership completely, and this would blow it wide open.

    And that could just be step one. We need assurances about what happens when a store closes (can we download everything and archive it and play offline? will it be moved to another provider?) We need the ability to move purchases between stores. Hell, even between platforms. We need to make sure accounts that have paid for goods cannot be completely revoked under any circumstances. Locked out of online play or prevented from making further purchases, sure, but never just blocked.

    Law makers have sat idly by for too long as our rights were taken from us. It’s high time to take them back.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    You know who would say economic boycotts don’t do anything? A lot of people defending Target a couple years ago. You could ask their CEO at that time, bit he was fired after they set the record for consecutive weeks losing value on their stock.

    If you have a console, join in. Maybe they will feel it. AND REMEMBER , one corporation always works to give the others cover to follow. So if you have another console, support. Do it, and tell friends.

    • ㄖㄨㄖㄙ祂@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      set the record for consecutive weeks

      Then be sure to tell the organizers to set the record of indefinite consecutive weeks of protest.

  • UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    In my region, PS5s were out of stock for a long time. Yesterday new stock came. Approx $200 more expensive than before. That too is for the digital version. 1 week not enough. Should be indefinite. Seeing industry trends, next one might be over $400 more expensive than current gen

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      In my region, PS5s were out of stock for a long time.

      It’s very funny to see folks talk about a boycott against a product that keeps selling out faster than the parent company can manufacture it.

  • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I used to be jealous of people with playstation back in the day, but now that i could afford one i have zero interest anymore. There’s nothing it does that my gaming pc doesn’t do. There’s no reason at all to buy a new one as far as i can tell.

  • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    184
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Don’t think casual gamers will care about this. Most will probably just boot up their games on PlayStation after a long day of work or university.

    • popcar2@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      8 days ago

      Seriously, timed blackouts and petitions are just being performative. If someone actually cares, sell your ps5/move to another platform. Nothing else matters. This is like how sports game fans complain every year that the game sucks but are still willing to drop 80 dollars on it.

            • Mikina@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 days ago

              This, aside from recently playing Death Stranding I got for free, and occasional Guild Wars 2 because they are pretty cool, I have not paid for (or played) an AAA game for years at this point.

              There’s so many cool indie games if you know where to dig, there’s really no need to play another remastered AAA slop.

    • mecen@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 days ago

      Agreed it should be: starting 23 of August not purchasing any digital games and microtransactions. It would hurt Sony the most

      • Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yup. People can’t sacrifice anything these days to make a statement.

        What is especially frustrating is how quickly these corporations would fold under pressure. Take a principled position for 1 week and watch what happens.

        • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Take a principled position for 1 week and watch what happens.

          As soon as a timeframe is added, the company will just ignore it, especially something as minor as a week. Boycott should not have an end date, only then would a company start to consider it and maybe try to do something to end it.

          • Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Sorry, I didn’t mean literally a week and to tell them first. I meant if enough people did this they would start to see the results of their effort in about one week.

        • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          The company would only fold under pressure if it was actually an issue a huge percentage of their customers cared about. This isn’t one of them.

        • DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          I wish I could see it in my lifetime. The scrambling back to people on their hands and knees and suddenly being super user friendly and pro consumer would be a glorious sight to behold.

          • Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Its literally so easy most of the time. Once or twice a year something comes out that I really want to use / play. Its the two times per year I “suffer.”. The rest is stuff I probably would have tried and played but its now so far off my radar they’ll never see a cent again (unless of course there is a major overhaul in whatever co’s business model; happy to return with a change).

            • DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              I feel this exact way with GTA 6 right now but it got a lot easier for me when I realized how many thousands of potential hours of amazing experiences I already have in my library.

              I’m starting to feel more fulfilled on going through that backlog than I am on whatever new game everyone is playing.

              I should have taken this route a long time ago.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Thats a weird one because Activision wants mw2 players to stop playing. They refuse the patch an RCE in multiplayer. These people are probably playing on the private servers. But if they spend any time on the game thats time away from where Activision wants them which is on the new game.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      Hm I wonder if that list of 17 pages is perhaps sorted to show people in the game who may have either accidentally clicked the join button or are new.

      • BoneheadBruin@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        ? I mean obviously there’s the possibility of it being shopped but there’s no sort order you could do where Borderlands, Dragon Age, and Team Fortress would all be up there mixed in to the Call of Duty players while still showing primarily Call of Duty in the middle of the list.

        Judging by the name order it seems like it’s just 1 page of online players and 16 pages of offline players? I would guess maybe it was taken way after the boycott but I dont know the full context.