• MNByChoice@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      I hear this a lot, so I dug a bit. What do others think?

      From https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism_in_the_United_Kingdom

      …the derogatory connotation is much weaker in the UK than in the US, and social liberals from both the left and right wing continue to use liberal and illiberal to describe themselves and their opponents, respectively.

      Is it possible, that in the rest of the world, many partys call themselves liberal and after ages of conservative governments calling themselves liberal, many people in the UK have not heard “the left” call themselves liberal?

      It may also be far too general of a term to be of value.

      • PatMustard@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        It may also be far too general of a term to be of value.

        This is my main complaint. We humans love putting things in little categories and labels, but if you’re using a word that you think means X and everyone else thinks it means Y or Z then suddenly we’re all taking at cross purposes and everyone thinks everyone else is chatting shit.

        • oce 🐆
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Liberalism is also pro social freedom. We should specify economically or socially liberal, depending on the political party it may be a different percentage of each.

      • Bondrewd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I was already contented with the fact that people here were going to circlejerk themselves into this.