• udon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 days ago

    Nice, I think this is the most honest confirmation that Mamdani is in fact the best candidate.

    • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      If they don’t respect the candidate elected in the primaries, then the party has to go. I ain’t voting blue no matter who any more. I fell for that these last 3 elections and look how far that took us.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    Democratic leadership is controlled opposition, there’s no other way to say it

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    Just like the Republican factions in The Spanish Civil War attacking each other for having the wrong ideology while the Fascists tightened their grip.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        With a wide brush you can paint the picture like this: The Republicans were left wing communists (or at least they wanted a democratic republic) and the Nationalists were right wing fascists.

        Nationalists won and they had a dictator (Franco) in Spain from 1939 to 1975.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      The lesser part maybe true but so is the evil part.

      Always has been, otherwise it wouldn’t be called the “lesser-evil” party, it’d be called the “good” party.

      We’ve known for decades (and I do mean everyone by ‘we’, I’m not even American) that the democrats are also corporate bootlickers. It’s just that their policies tend to be less anti-human generally. For a while, it was clear: Vote dem, get some consumer protections and slow improvements in healthcare, LGBT rights, etc. Vote republican, get every good thing repealed and new anti-consumer, anti-lgbt, anti-healthcare legislation introduced. Now the dems want to cater to the right for votes and the “lesser” part of “lesser evil” is starting to diminish. They’re still the lesser evil, but they’re also more in the way of true progress than ever.

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I am so sick of seeing people abuse the word “tremendous” like this following in asshat’s footsteps, but at least it’s a nice, straightforward way for me to identify people to hit with a baseball bat if I can ever get away with it.

  • kinsnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    255
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Democrats will be doing a disservice […] if they don’t come together and decide to support whichever candidate has the most support among them”…

    what do you think a primary election is? it is literally seeing who has the most support among democrats. so this guy is the one who is doing the disservice of not deciding to support Zohran

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      154
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah but the people don’t know who they want. The DNC knows who the people want. This is why I nominate Hillary Clinton as NYC mayor.

      • kinsnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        68
        ·
        8 days ago

        yeah, let’s stop “cannibalizing each other’s support” by attacking the nominee and giving support to others. very sound strategy, mr paterson.

        sheessh. can’t he SEE that the democrats need new blood

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          71
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Democrats and Republicans work for the same billionaires. You are about to witness Democrats working against Mamdani like they never have against Republicans.

            • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 days ago

              I believe equally strongly in personal freedoms and individual rights. I think that makes me liberal. Fascism definitely has significantly less of both compared to socialism which is also not what I think of when reading Mamdani’s policies.

              “Taxation is theft” people are deranged imo, not liberal; pointing their frustration at the wrong part of the system. Are those the people everyone thinks of when the word liberal comes up?

            • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              I really hate statements like this. Not because you are right or wrong, but because your word choices obscure your true meaning when used this briefly.

              In the context of this thread, which is clearly US politics, “liberal” has a somewhat different meaning to the majority of the audience than I think you are using. I almost think you are just making rage-bait, but I’ve seen it so many times that I have to respond to someone.

              We have a clear dichotomy of our political parties, since we effectively only have two… some words I might use are ‘republican’, ‘conservative’, ‘democrat(ic)’, ‘liberal’, ‘progressive’, ‘socialist’, ‘fascist’, ‘leftist’, ‘right-wing’

              Because of human language, these may signify different things based on context.

              I identify as a “liberal” in my country. I am also a “democrat”, as well as a “socialist” and a “leftist”. I am anti-trump. I would vote for Mamdani, but I’m not in the area.

              When you make absolute statements like “liberals will ALWAYS support the fascists,” you ignore the context. Perhaps in the dictionary sense of the words, a liberal will prefer a fascist government where wealth makes power and they get all the benefit of their work over a socialist one where their input helps everyone. That describes a giant swath of business owners for sure, as well as the ‘taxes are theft’ people. In the US, though, a liberal could mean a person more focused on bodily autonomy, social equality, social safety nets and other more ‘socialist’ concepts.

              Another way to put this is that the political words are a 3D venn diagram. When you put your line of liberal = capitalist against someone who is thinking liberal = democrat, you are going to have friction because, based on context, that word lands in different places. I’m going to ignore any ‘all democrats are capitalists’ arguments, or complexities around our election systems. See my post history if you want my opinions there.

              If anything, I’d recommend that people clearly define their words, such as a liberal vs a liberal. And even then, you can see that both are capitalist by those definitions even though, colloquially, a person may identify as liberal while preferring socialist ideals.

              Basically, any absolutes, especially in the realm of political ideology, makes you a Sith (probably). Also basically, anyone firing off a one-liner in a conversation this fraught is a troll (probably).

              • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                Liberal just means they support capitalism as opposed to socialism or feudalism, it covers everyone from Scandinavian social democrats to Javier Gerardo Milei.

                Liberalism: A Counter History is free on Annie’s Archive, it goes through the major liberal philosophers, their role in society, and how they handled the contradictions of liberalism.

        • Chef@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Ok this is either comedy (if you know) or happenstance (if you don’t know)…

          But David Paterson is blind.

          And not like “blind allegiance to the party” but actually, legally blind.

          Either way, he cannot SEE that the democrats need new blood.

      • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        It’s been so fucking ridiculous to watch the US left spend three decades just completely buying into the conservative smear job against the Clintons. Just licking up every drop of the trash they’ve fed you.

        Perfect? Not by a long shot. But you’ll be goddamn lucky to ever get another president as qualified and capable as Bill or Hillary ever again.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Bill “Epstein Island” Clinton?

          Hillary “Let’s promote Trump and sabotage Bernie” Clinton? Very capable politicians. Have a “ButHerEmails”.

          How the Hillary Clinton campaign deliberately “elevated” Donald Trump with its “pied piper” strategy

          In its self-described “pied piper” strategy, the Clinton campaign proposed intentionally cultivating extreme right-wing presidential candidates, hoping to turn them into the new “mainstream of the Republican Party” in order to try to increase Clinton’s chances of winning.

          The Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee called for using far-right candidates “as a cudgel to move the more established candidates further to the right.” Clinton’s camp insisted that Trump and other extremists should be “elevated” to “leaders of the pack” and media outlets should be told to “take them seriously.”

          ___

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          But you’ll be goddamn lucky to ever get another president as qualified and capable as Bill or Hillary ever again.

          Provided you’re a billionaire.

              • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                And who are literally a mile to the left of anyone the DNC has to offer.

                American “leftists”: ready to throw fists in defense of 1990s Rush Limbaugh talking points but absolutely incensed at the suggestion that they’re not doing enough to stop the fascist overthrow of their government. 🤡

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  And who are literally a mile to the left of anyone the DNC has to offer.

                  The clintons and soulless corpodems exactly like them are all the DNC is willing to offer.

                  American “leftists”: ready to throw fists in defense of 1990s Rush Limbaugh talking points

                  Why would rush limbaugh say that they’re too far to the right? Just because the clintons are to your left, that doesn’t mean they’re acceptable.

    • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 days ago

      For DNC democrats are the donors and most probably AIPAC. Democrat citizenry are not the target for them.

      For AIPAC Mamdani is antithesis to Israel, which is much more important than US.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      oh for as long as it’s been a thing, primaries are simply a way for the owning classes to convince themselves they manufactured enough consent. when it fails them they pull this crap and it will all be forgotten when the next season’s newest life changing emergency drops.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    167
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Mamdani: It’s about the policies

    Democrats: Gee whiz, you ran such a good campaign

    Voters: It’s about the policies

    Democrats: Gosh, if only centrists could find such a charismatic guy.

    They think everyone but them is so stupid. It’s infuriating that the system is set up so we’re forced to work with these twats.

    We found that charismatic centrist they’re looking for. His name is Barack Obama, and we’re still dealing with the fallout of him campaigning on “change” and failing to deliver.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Because of Obama I had health insurance. Because of Obama I was not in medical bankruptcy.

      But then again that was almost 10 YEARS AGO. Blaming a black American man for White Backlash is so American it hurts.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          8 days ago

          You mean Bush? The meltdown happened before the election. By the time Obama got in office his choices were to finish the plan in place, or create even worse short term upheaval by changing plans.

          • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            63
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            8 days ago

            True. I forgot. Democrats can’t just stop Republican policies when they have full control. Only Republicans can stop Democrat policies. And Obama executing the Bush plan to bail out all the banks and brutally surpress occupy wall street was not his fault. My bad.

            • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Tbf to the previous poster, the Republican party is great at setting up sabotaging and impossible choices for when a democrat is elected. E.G. the tax bill TACO passed in his first term that was set to raise taxes for all people making under 75k in 2025. E.G.2 The troop widthdraw plan in the Middle East that had no preparation done before Biden came to office and all those munitions were left behind.

              On your point though, yeah the Dems are beyond completely incompetent each time they have one of those situations. It’d be nice if they stopped pretending politeness and passivity was the same as having good morals.

              • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                You’re right this makes it better. Trump using the national guard to arrest 1 (one) protester is what crossed the line for me. It’s not about abuse of violence to violate the right to protest and protect the billionaire class. What matters is that Trump did a thing very slightly differently.

                • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I mean, you had a point about the bailouts. I just don’t think you can blame the suppression of Occupy Wall Street protestors on Obama himself. He wasn’t the only neoliberal in charge in 2011. Sure, the FBI and DHS were keeping tabs, but it was the NYPD that did the violent suppression, under orders from Mayor Bloomberg.

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        The last time a non-change candidate won a presidential election in the US was 2004. No president since Obama has had enough of a majority in congress to enact meaningful change, and it was squandered. It’s not entirely his fault, but as the leader of the Democrats at the time he takes the plurality of responsibility. The ACA started off as a change that could have fixed healthcare in the US but got watered down into propping up a fundamentally broken system.

        Trying to deflect a politicians legitimate failures as racism or sexism is so Democrat it hurts. Yes, racism and sexism played a part in Trump winning, but discontent with the status quo pushed him over the finish line. If racism and sexism alone are enough to fuel the Trump regime and keep it in power, then I guess it’s time to flee the country, because we’re a lost cause.

          • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            Less infighting and more pushing things forward would have been great too. Playing for reelection is a loosing position; I want to see more aggression with policy change.

        • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Leaders move masses. Look at Lincoln, look at either Roosevelt (who didn’t even come from the working class). They had a vision and they pulled the country towards that vision. I refuse to believe that out of 350million of us there aren’t a couple people capable of being real leaders. ‘we don’t have the votes’ - so get them. Bernie Sanders was polling at less than 1% when he entered the race against Clinton, and he nearly beat her by building a movement. The reason they don’t have the votes is because they don’t want them. They don’t actually believe in progressive policies.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      Gosh, if only centrists could find such a charismatic guy.

      The Overton window has moved so far right that the DNC only has humorless executives and dead faced lawyers left as candidates.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    As long as Democrats block popular leftist policy they are no better than the Republicans.

    If a party only allows policy that consolidates wealth into the hands of the rich then it is useless to workers.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    We cannot aford ideas without a plan for implementation or funding.

    From Zohran’s site:

    Taxes on big corporations and the wealthiest New Yorkers

    Zohran has a plan to bring down the cost-of-living through city-owned grocery stores, universal childcare, and other bold proposals, and he knows exactly how to pay for it, too. Zohran’s revenue plan will raise the corporate tax rate to match New Jersey’s 11.5%, bringing in $5 billion. And he will tax the wealthiest 1% of New Yorkers—those earning above $1 million annually—a flat 2% tax (right now city income tax rates are essentially the same whether you make $50,000 or $50 million). Zohran will also implement common-sense procurement reform, end senseless no-bid contracts, hire more tax auditors, and crack down on fine collection from corrupt landlords to raise an additional $1 billion.

    • lividweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      8 days ago

      There’s some unspoken words there:

      We cannot aford ideas without a plan for implementation or funding.

      “…that must not impact our wealthy donors.”

    • SoupBrick@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      Shhhh, their corporate doners are trying to push propaganda through them! Stop defending a candidate who is not at all sympathetic towards the upper class!

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        the DNC is so desperate they had to pull cumuo out of the dredges of the sewer as a candidate. im guessing alot of rich billionaires live in or around NYC so they wouldnt want a democrat mayor most of the time, they want a status quo to be maintained.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    They’ve spent more time and effort going after Mamdani than they did trying to stop the “Big Beautiful Bill.”

    • Ænima@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Hey, don’t be disingenuous, they got the name changed in the senate and Booker stood tall with his little-league baseball bat! You can’t expect perfection!

      le sigh

      /S because this is the world we live in…