• Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    4 days ago

    So American will pay between 20 and 40% tax on goods coming from Vietnam but the Vietnamese can buy US goods with no tax?

    Cool.

    Do Americans know this?

      • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s funny. 20 to 40 tax on Americans and none on the Vietnamese and he thinks that people who make an average of USD$8,000 per year are going to buy $100,000 US SUVs. He’s a delusional idiot.

        • Xande@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 days ago

          I some times ask myself is it dementia or imbecility?

          Does that man understand the bullshit coming out of his holes, or is it the narcism that makes him talk and talk and talk, no matter how much lunacy is it the words leaving him…

          • comfy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            If I had no idea who he was, I could give extreme benefit of the doubt and say it’s spin. Claiming a loss is really a win.

            But we do know who he is, so I’m going with imbecility.

            • Xande@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              I clicked on the link and There’s no german page for that… but there’s a page in Pfälzisch, the dialect people in the german region Palatinate (Pfalz) speak.

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is he aware that us car manufacturing has been decimated by china?

    Why would they buy us suv, when china is right there and they can buy straight from the factory?

  • groet@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    256
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yes, the country known for driving scooters instead of cars will start buying SUVs that don’t even fit the streets in many cities

          • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            *banh mi

            But yes, so very delicious. So fresh too.

            SUVs won’t work in Vietnam, not when you have Grab and scooters everywhere. It might become a rich person thing to drive around in those awful yank tanks but that’s hardly a market.

            This just sounds like the VN government is just making a nothing deal sound good for Trump. Americans paying tariffs for incoming VN products versus Vietnamese paying nothing for incoming American SUVs? A product that most Vietnamese won’t find useful at all?

            Ugh.

            I want some bread now…

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              5 days ago

              Oops, wrong spelling!

              But uh, yeah, I agree, Trump got played, SUVs will take off in Vietnam as well as McDonalds did.

              Trump is an actual idiot.

              Not like, ad hom insult idiot.

              He is just actually an idiot.

              He still doesn’t understand what a trade balance even is, or that services/digital goods we export aren’t part of that number.

              He’s a spoiled brat that’s gotten as far as he has by being an abusive narcissist who csn just buy his way out of everything with daddy’s money.

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              5 days ago

              Literally banh mis and other Vietnamese basically street food, pho, stuff like that, is why McDonalds didn’t take off.

              Vietnam has some truly tasty and cost effective cuisine, and McDonalds was largely only eaten by corpo types just as a flex of how much money they have.

              Its less nutritious, less tasty, and more expensive than what the Vietnamese have been eating for 100s, 1000s of years.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                From what I understand, it’s all pretty cheap too. So the profit margins for McDs were probably thinner.

                • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Last time I read a breakdown report on it, yeah, it was something in the range of…

                  A typical street vendor banh mi has more actual like weight of food in a sandwich than a McD borgor, and the McD borgor is also between 2x to 4x as expensive, depending on exactly where you are in Vietnam.

                  Also, lol, the vastly most profitable part of a McD meal is the soda, and then fries.

                  Like a drink that costs you $3.00 at McDonalds costs them fractions of a penny.

                  And… HFCS soda just has not worked too well in any Asian markets, basically.

                  Thats how you end up with like, Diet Cucumber Coca Cola in Japan, lol, a lot of Asia already also has a lot of great drinks, such as boba tea… and just actual tea, etc.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The real problem there would be gas stations. Even Top Gear used scooters and motorcycles when they did a trip in Vietnam. And the big moron hated motorcycles.

      • grue@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        …what? Being good off-road, or on bad roads, is [supposed to be] the entire point of SUVs.


        Edit: Okay, okay, I get it. Language changes and “SUV” doesn’t mean what I want it to mean. I’m well aware that I’m No True Scotsman-ing, but that doesn’t make me any less mad about it! 😠

        A representative sample chosen from among the replies wrote:

        A truck maybe. Most SUVs are just big chunky road cars.

        SUVs are supposed to be trucks with seats in the cargo area!

        first-generation Toyota 4Runner, a real SUV, shown with the top removed so that it looks like a pickup truck with a seat in the cargo bed

        All the car-based junk they build these days aren’t real SUVs, and shouldn’t exist because they’re objectively inferior to station wagons and minivans.

        Every SUV ought to be an acutally-off-road-capable one, and the only people who should buy them are ones who actually take them off-road.

        • monkeyflower jelly bean@sfba.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 days ago

          @grue yeah, so the commercials say. The ones I’ve driven haven’t been particularly better than sedans except higher clearance… making them more likely to rollover or break axles instead of scrape oil pans.

        • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          They’re just a classification meant to evade certain regulations to sell worse cars based on a few metrics regarding things like clearance. Given the point is to avoid having to make a decent car…

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Those car-based junk things are actually called “crossover SUVs”, but the manufacturers are now just calling them SUVs, at least where I’m from.

          I refuse to call anything without a proper transfer case an SUV personally. Hell, even the German luxury SUV barges at least have transfer cases with electronic locking of some sort. But plenty of crossovers have open center diffs with only traction control to facilitate “locking” it.

        • monkeyflower jelly bean@sfba.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          @grue yep, I’m mad about SUVs too! I think everyone should be. They’re also way more dangerous for the people around them as well as being bad at the purposes they’re advertised for.
          I often say that if I decide it’s okay to be a terrible person and I want to harm the people around me and punish and increase costs to my government I’ll buy an SUV.

          • grue@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I mean, I own an old SUV myself (a real one, that I got specifically for off-roading and backcountry camping). I’m just not so anti-social as to daily-drive it in the city.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          With their weight and the lower profile tires that come stock, and how they’re kinda just like regular cars but bigger in every way except where it counts, they really aren’t. Their single big advantage is the ground clearance but many actually have bodies that come surprisingly low. One the OG Ford Rangers would be great, but only if it had 4x4 because all those RWD only trucks, especially when they have nothing in the back, are essentially worthless due to the total lack of traction. They’re also super long, which makes maneuvering difficult in tight spaces so obstacles you could have gone around are now barriers you have go through. Besides, my BRZ doesn’t explode when it hits a pothole or touches a gravel road and in fact does quite well, even when it was lowered by an inch. Hilariously, unlike many vehicles the BRZ comes with a metal skid plate by default to protect the oil pan from the road.

          Trucks and SUVs are terrible. Body on Frame vans and smaller unibody work vans are incredible but most people are too stupid and/or insecure and vain to buy them instead.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Its true that around the origin of SUVs, yes, this was the point, and many could… not offroad as well as a specifically off road geared vehicle, but could offroad a lot better than a sedan.

          But, now its been 20ish years, and broadly, manufacturing standards / quality control are shit ass fuck tier bad, everything is desiged to break just after your warranty expires, and are also intentionally engineered to be nightmares to try to self repair, or just literally impossible to do this due to ‘everything’s computer!’ (unless you also want to hack your car)…

          … so those offroad capabilities are functionally no longer present, beyond I guess all wheel drive as a mode.

          Really, these days, an SUV is just a minivan that seats less people, doesn’t have a sliding door, costs a fuckton more, has better ground clearance, and ‘looks cooler’.

          Pretty similar MPG.

        • BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Supposed to be, according to markering. Isn’t. I think only half of SUVs sold in the US even have 4 wheel drive. This is fine because in the US most pickups and SUVs are just massive pavement princesses anyway.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      don’t be surprised when the capitalists see this obvious issue as an “opportunity” for development of bigger streets etc. ie: profit.

    • Xande@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Of course… Ford Explorers and Lincoln Escalade are already being prepared for sal… wait… never being shipped to Vietnam.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    In other words Vietnamese will not pay extra for US cars but US citizens will pay extra for EVERYTHING that comes from Vietnam. LOL

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Thank you for your attention to this matter” is a phrase stolen from fifth-rate middle-management corporate power wannabes. We are not his employees and do not work for him. I’d believe him more if he ended his endless emails with “…and always remember. Fuck You”.

    • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      As I keep saying: It sounds like he thinks the word “tariff” just means “payment”. Then he follows that with “[whoever he thinks should make the payment]”. Tariff by Apple, Tariff by China, etc. Honestly. I don’t know how else you can make it make sense.

      https://lemmy.world/comment/17225002

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        My supposition is that he’s a complete moron following advice from someone working off a protectionism 101 primer from 1834 who had Randian bullshit physically replace his brain to the point where they don’t do the rest of the steps to make the protectionism work because that’s the government doing stuff and therefore communism

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      5 days ago

      I honestly can’t decide if he just really doesn’t know or he’s this consistently dishonest. It’s hard to pick cuz I have trouble believing he could be that consistent about anything.

      • 😀🚲@urbanists.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        @njm1314 @KoboldCoterie he’s a conman, so pretty consistent with whichever lies the con depends on, like LEV generally means Low Emission Vehicle. He knows how tariffs work, but won’t admit that. Keeping cult members in a disinformation bubble is the whole game.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        politicians are not usually that dumb regardless of the image they project.

        you can bet its dishonesty with just a side of stupidity, as a treat.

      • Caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        It think he’s role playing as a “wildcard” character. He actually has said he likes being unpredictable to keep people on their toes.

    • doc@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Frustratingly his constant repeating of this backwards understanding is working. It’s starting to widely take hold and resistance in the face of constant misinformation is breaking down. I heard in the last week NPR and the BBC repeat the “foreign country will pay” as fact, not a quote, with no effort to correct or clarify.

      What’s the saying? Repeat a lie enough and it becomes reality?

    • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Neither do the people whom who voted. This is why an educated population is very important

  • 2lama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    SUV=SubUrban Vehicle

    That’s what I thought the acronym stood for when I was younger, because I would usually see them in suburbs. Now that I’m older, I refuse to call them sport utility vehicles because suburban vehicle is a much better description of their intended use-case.

  • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    5 days ago

    I have never once heard anyone ever refer to an SUV as a ‘Large Engine Vehicle’. Am I just unaware, or is this trump being a complete idiot again?

    • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      He didn’t actually say this, someone with access to his TS/Twitter account did. They don’t know wtf SUV stands for and probably made it up.

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 days ago

        So they also have to imitate his illiterate misuse of title case for Important Words, random quotation marks for “emphasis”, and littering of SHOUTY WORDS, not to mention his bizarre self-aggrandized tone and his ridiculous ways of ending messages that he thinks makes them look more important? Thank you for your attention to this matter.

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            5 days ago

            Debatable who’s using Titlecase improperly, the Ones actually using it to convey Meaning and structure a Sentence, or the Ones afraid of Capitalisation and Compoundwords slightly longer than Banana. #Mikrofonfallenlassgeräusch

            • oo1@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              Live Winnie The Pooh:

              “When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.”

    • Tobberone@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’d say it is an obvious way to try to confuse BEV with LEV… To sell more ICE-cars…

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      The term large engine vehicle sounds like came from the same guy that coined big dick energy

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    5 days ago

    Lol, one visit to Vietnam can easily show you why an SUV is not going to be a hit there. It’s basically motorcycle country. Cars are pretty common too, but motorcycles are basically THE form of transportation there.

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Unfortunately their governemnt is investing heavily into car only infrastructure which bikes aren’t allowed to use. It’s frustrating to see considering their cities are already at maximum traffic with motorbikes alone. Adding cars to the mix there just isn’t possible.

      Also there’s no way that US automakers will be able to outcompete Vinfast and Chinese EVs who are working with better subsidies and significantly cheaper labor.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s ok, there will be a statement at some point in the near future from some Vietnamese official denying that any of this post from Trump is true.

        This has been the pattern, I’ve no doubt it will continue to be.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      And their streets are narrow, especially in the French quarter of Hanoi and other older areas. The vehicles in use currently are often very small to make it easier to navigate the narrow roads (and street/laneway parking) and like you mention - the scooters, which are like 90% of vehicle traffic.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I’m in Hanoi right now. Theres quite a few SUVs and crossovers. Maybe between 1:4 and 1:8 cars to bikes.

      Mostly Kias and Toyotas, I saw 1 Ford Explorer.

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        1:4 is a wild ratio. I can’t picture that in Saigon, but maybe Hanoi is a lot different

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s so bad for the flow of traffic.

          I can only pray the government does something to discourage cars and encourage electric bikes before it gets worse.

        • timuchan@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I was in Saigon in 2016 and there were quite a few SUVs, lots of larger Toyotas like Land Cruisers for Uber, etc.