• itsJoelle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah dawg, I’m a Dev. The websites for the menus are usually fucking aweful, and are, ironically enough, not optimized for mobile.

      Usually you can request a physical menu, as to not look at the webdev gore.

      • ManjuuLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think my real complaint is that I’m using my data to pay them more money for services they should already be offering customers. It feels like we might as well end with a step-by-step self-cooking restaurant and we pay them to cook the food ourselves.

      • CoderKat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If they design the online menu well, I’m all for it. In theory, an online only menu should improve the quality of the menu, by making it much easier to keep it up to date (eg, there should never be an “ask your server what the soup of the day is” in an online menu – update that you lazy schmucks) and it’s also easier for them to have pictures.

        The fact that not every food item has pictures drives me crazy. Show me what the dang food looks like. Unless it’s something you never sell, it’s so dang easy to get a picture when someone orders it. I don’t want a fake picture anyway; I want the pictures to be representative of how it will really look. With physical menus, it’s understandable because printing is so expensive and pictures would make the menu extra long. Online menus don’t have that issue or excuse.

        But yeah, if their online menu is gonna be a mediocre PDF copy of their former print menus clearly designed for 8x11 or whatever, it’s a downright worse experience using a digital menu. That’s the case for a shocking number of restaurants I’ve been at. You’d think mobile devices are some new fangled fad or something, cause they sure don’t think mobile is something someone will view their menu on.

      • gizmonicus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That and it’s usually hosted off some slow ass, janky website where I hit refresh three times to get all the assets to load without timing out.

        “Uhh, yes, I’ll have the 404 not found, dressing on the side, with a 504 gateway timeout, medium rare. Oh, and could we get a round of 500 internal server error for the table, please?”

    • ox0rOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      MF I am posting this with a freaking phone wdym ludites? I have lightbulbs.

      Also the ludites weren’t even inherently anti technology

      • 😂 sorry dude, just being a jerk. But I am really surprised at the anti-mobile menu movement (say that five times fast). Reduces paper use, reduces waste, reduces germ transmission, never goes out of date. So many benefits over dead tree.

        Anyway I gotta say “I have lightbulbs” is the best response I’ve heard to an accusation of luddism. I love that.

        > the luddites weren’t even inherently anti technology

        Yeah, and Nicholas Chauvin didn’t particularly hate women, either, so… :)