• @onion@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    15 months ago

    don’t make sense and you can’t back up

    Wrong and wrong?

    Trains are more space-efficient than cars and can therefore solve traffic congestion.

    There you go. Not that difficult to grasp.

    • @EvokerKing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      Trains are barely more space efficient and what would we do with current roads for cars anywhere? If we just leave them there, nothing would be gained. And cars are just easier to travel by and make more sense in general.

      • @onion@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        make more sense in general

        That’s a meaningless statement

        barely more space efficient

        By barely you mean 20 fold?

        Passenger_Capacity_of_different_Transport_Modes

        • @EvokerKing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          See, this is why I don’t like these posts. You have to keep in mind that the train won’t be at that capacity because it is more limited in where it can go and when. Sure, if you are like going across a country it’s alright, and I don’t disagree, I’ve actually used trains for that. But as soon as it becomes the only source of transportation, we have issues.

          • @onion@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            15 months ago

            This post literally has car lanes in the fucking picture so get your strawman out of here

              • @onion@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                15 months ago

                The problem with having only car lanes is that they’ll always be congested, no matter how many lanes you add (look up induced demand). Trains have so much more capacity that we don’t run into this issue.

                Basically, 4 car lanes=traffic jams twice a day vs. 2 car lanes + 2 train tracks= traffic flowing freely.

                Of course a subway would be even nicer but those aren’t always an option because tunneling is expensive

                • @EvokerKing@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  15 months ago

                  And making train tracks across line distances is also expensive. Why would the government spend money there instead of something like the failing school system or defending the nation or trying to help with the huge issue of homelessness.