• @iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    76 months ago

    I mean I am going to play devils advocate but I wonder if they also include stuff like how much carbon emission does your online and non-local shopping habits are causing indirectly? Or your meat consumption? Or your airplane travels? Fuck big companies yes but also we have to change our consumerist mentality as humanity too.

    • @LemmysMum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Your argument boils down to suffer more because someone else is doing proportionately more damage to the point where your personal contribution is entirely negligible and we don’t know how to fix that.

        • @LemmysMum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Can’t buy what isn’t sold. The bulk of society don’t have the financial capacity to change their purchasing habits, they’re already struggling for survival.

          • @iAvicenna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            46 months ago

            middle to upper class? I mean sure a handful of individuals have %50 percent of the whole wealth but it is not a handful of individuals who are consuming that amount of meat and using amazon (or the likes) daily to get ten useless junks shipped all the way from china every month. can’t sell what is not being bought.

            • @LemmysMum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              56 months ago

              Lmao, you think the bulk of human society is middle to upper class? No wonder your perspective is warped. You’d ignore those who can’t just because some can.

              • @iAvicenna@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Where did I say that the bulk of human society is middle to upper class? If you are poor enough that you can’t eat meat, use airplanes, or use amazon to get junk shipped across the world you obviously don’t contribute to over consumerism. The fact remains however that some hundred million to billion people are wealthy enough to contribute to over consumerism and they do. Without these people’s spending habits these companies wouldn’t be able to grow so much. Our consumption habits are the sugar that feeds the cancer. Stop feeding the cancer.

                • @LemmysMum@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  4
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Exactly, yet you would sit here and preach to the lesser influence and to those under the boot rather than the producers. Fix your priorities and stop attacking those trying to survive rather than those exploiting even the people you say are “wealthy enough to do better”.

          • rumschlumpel
            link
            fedilink
            Deutsch
            26 months ago

            Most of the stuff most people buy on Amazon and the like is definitely optional.