Amazing stuff.

  • @Tetsuo
    link
    English
    76 months ago

    The idea of shipping liquid fuel in trucks and dispensing it out of hoses at special fuel stores is just silly.

    I don’t necessarily disagree with that but I hope you see that this type of infrastructure is exactly what we currently have and have proven to work.

    It wouldn’t be that stupid to reuse an existing infrastructure that is already built. The issue with our current fuel infrastructure is that it is moving fossil fuel.

    • @ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -16 months ago

      What I don’t get is how gasoline even has an infrastructure. It’s delivered by trucks. If you replace the manufacture and dispensing with new equpement, what infrastructure are you left with? Trucks?

      • @Tetsuo
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It all relates to the density of energy in fuel.

        Fossil fuel is so energy dense you can get away with pretty much any way to distribute/dispense.

        what infrastructure are you left with? Trucks?

        Trucks and most importantly thousands of strategically located gas stations. Even if you distribute a different kind and less dense energy I would argue it still makes sense to have spread out stations all over the place.

        If we want to keep using our existing roads and highways we will need those stations even if they distribute something entirely different.