Hilarious you chose this hill to exercise your insecurity on. You are just regurgitating someone elses words but you don’t actually understand what they actually mean so you chuck a tantrum when challenged. The point stands yes, it is still that you don’t know what you are talking about.
Kinda funny you are trying to cite a 50 year old rant as fact but mostly it is just sad.
Are you? You googled natural language programming after I mentioned it and pasted the first link you saw that mentioned it negatively thinking you are making a point. But you are just an idiot who doesn’t understand.
Disjkstra wrote a nice paper explaining why natural language is terrible to write code… It’s a dream for idiots, actual engineers dread the ambiguity.
Lol you are not knowledgable you think you are using words that have impact but you are just an idiot with nothing to say.
For anyone interested: https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~EWD/transcriptions/EWD06xx/EWD667.html
It’s not because you don’t understand them that they’re meaningless.
Classic LLM-fueled Dunning-Krueger nutcase.
Perfection
deleted by creator
Ah, touché. That was a bit… grandiloquent 😄
The original point still stands though, there was nothing actually mystical about what I was saying before, it was fairly simple to understand.
I honestly cannot figure out why it would fly above your head like that.
Hilarious you chose this hill to exercise your insecurity on. You are just regurgitating someone elses words but you don’t actually understand what they actually mean so you chuck a tantrum when challenged. The point stands yes, it is still that you don’t know what you are talking about.
Kinda funny you are trying to cite a 50 year old rant as fact but mostly it is just sad.
I am… linking to a relevant article? Are you OK?
Are you? You googled natural language programming after I mentioned it and pasted the first link you saw that mentioned it negatively thinking you are making a point. But you are just an idiot who doesn’t understand.