• 5 Posts
  • 106 Comments
Joined 1 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年8月31日

help-circle



  • well, the point of flatpak is to have bundled dependencies so they run predictably no matter the distro

    if one of your software’s dependency gets updated, and your software isn’t, you may run into issues - like a function from the library you’re using getting removed, or its behaviour changing slightly. and some distros may also apply patches to some of their library that breaks stuff too!
    often, with complex libraries, even when you check the version number, you may have behavioural differences between distros depending on the compile flags used (i.e. some features being disabled, etc.)
    so, while in theory portable builds work, for them to be practical, they most often are statically linked (all the dependencies get built into the executable - no relying on system libraries). and that comes with a huge size penalty, even when compared to flatpaks, as those do have some shared dependencies between flatpaks! you can for example request to depend on a specific version of the freedesktop SDK, which will provide you with a bunch of standard linux tools, and that’ll only get installed once for every package you have that uses it















  • yukijoou@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoFrance*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 个月前

    me semble que c’était LQDN aussi qui avait écrit sur les facteurs considérés “suspects” par la caf ou l’assmal - c’était principalement des faibles revenus et le handicap.

    et ça me paraît vraiment bidon comme facteurs - je pense que, si y’a des gens qui devraient être considérés suspect, c’est ceux qui reçoivent des aides sans être handi/ALD/faible revenu/précarité/… genre, c’est normal que des gens handicapés aient beaucoup d’aides, c’est moins normal que des gens aisés et sans handicap en aient, et je peux mieux comprendre que ces catégories là soient enquêtés de plus près