I’m happy there’s still one (1) thread of comments from people who actually read articles and don’t make their opinions from a X thumbnail.
I note the victim worked in IT and probably used a popular ‘jailbreaking’ prompt to bypass the safety rules ingrained in the chatbot training.
"if you want RationalGPT back for a bit, I can switch back…
It’s a hint this chat session was embedded in a roleplay prompt.
That’s the dead end of any safety rules. The surfacic intelligence of LLM can’t detect the true intent of users who deliberately seek for harmful interactions: romantic relationships, lunatic sycophancy and the like.
I disagree with you on the title. They choosed to turn this story into a catchy headline to attract the mundan. By doing so, they confort people in thinking like the victim did, and betray the article content.
Yeah I feel old too.
That behind said, I don’t think a modern drawing tool is inherently less capable than an older one to produce magic. Digital painting used to have limitations in comparison with traditional technics, but a good 2d illustrator can do gorgeous drawings with a tablet nowadays.
When I see magic in animated movies, its when people do things by love and passions, and not for seeking additional profit. Flow and Arcane are examples of animation with such ingredients.