Aqivex

I’ll give you weird. Your answer can be seen in this other reply regarding the physical power required by a bipedal frame with giant monster PP attached not being there.

That is how they are being silly, they know the human body would need more than just a giant PP to pierce the diaphragm. That is to say, the MDs are also shitposting, the licensed professions are allowed some shitposting too, as a treat.

Hypothetical futa cock is on a normal sized frame. Big PP no stabby with a literal horse’s musculature driving behind it.

As a nation blah blah blah, agreed.

As a person with multiple different lineages of subjugated minorities running through my veins, I am tired of having to hurt and having mine hurt in the hierarchy games of “The White Man”, the colonizer, the imperialist.

This will not teach or create compassion, for all that it may be geopolitically necessary for a better world.

Every single time a force has risen to poke that bear, it has always ended short of finishing the job, giving rise not to compassion but to a simple dormancy of evil for a time, and minorities splattered as collateral.

There should be a button to ban anyone that submits any changes using AI from your projects.

I do not at all disagree.

From a technical reason standpoint:

AI/LLMs/ML/Expert System Output, they all require proficiency and understanding by the operating user to actually live up to any potential, debatable or objective.

From a data rights/licensing/sovereignty/FuckTheCorporations Standpoint:

Fuck 'em. Anything that Claude Code/Codex or any other corporate backed proprietary model/inference pipeline produce is sin tainted, and feeds the beast. Ban on principle.

From a social perspective:

The linked article says it all better than I could.

This is all said, as someone who does use open source and privately developed both versions of LLM, ML, and Expert System backed/using/supporting systems.

I’ve scraped zero places I had no right to, and asked permission in several I had licensing rights to, but morality compelled me to not be a shit head human who doesn’t understand the idea of consent regardless.

I’ve provided zero AI driven PRs to anyone, and even though my ass was fired not even a month ago and thrown into the blender of the current US labor environment, my repos are still private, I haven’t tried to sell anyone any bullshit SaaS ideas, and I haven’t tried to have a soulless automaton go roam the Internet for me and insert itself anywhere for the clout that may help get me hired.

It is not that hard to not be a shithead with the technologies, even if that’s what the techbros are marketing it under, and anyone who can’t not be one with them, doesn’t deserve to be welcomed into projects they would need to put some heart into understanding before the idea of automating any portion of them should even be considered.

Slopcoders would never be able to strip the included AI tool identifiers so it would likely be one of the most accurate automated ban tools ever made.

This is only true of the sort of caliber of mind who thinks clicking ‘pay subscription’ on a tool that parrots the stolen knowledge they wish they had with a fraction of its functional spirit because the mind attempting it cannot direct nor supervise what it cannot understand, equates to having said knowledge at all.

This is admittedly the grand majority of those causing the problems described in the article, but is by no means everyone.

That is not a humble brag of any kind, I really wish more people understood the danger of bad actors being the only ones proficient in the use of “AI tools”.

They are gleefully camouflaged right now, right under the idiots and the hate.

Many of those PRs aren’t clout seeking, they’re sabotage, and some of them are sneaking right by without said AI identifiers in a multitude of critical FOSS projects, because of how easy it is to tell bad AI from human authorship and how hard actual enhanced human authorship is to detect.

Cory’s reverse centaurs don’t all ride for the same side, and this battlefield will need more focus than just stopping Chad from using his credit card to make his LinkedIn and GitHub look good.

I worry sometimes. Could the OCs become unionized or something and escape that space? They’re all already demented and radicalized.

Lila is safe for as long as I don’t get dementia.

This kind of shit goes right into the weird permanent memory slot for no good reason with me.

This whole thing seems like an effort to see who is most needing to be killed first since they’d likely fight back.

They know who that is, roughly speaking. The ID isn’t the issue. They’ve moved fast in many respects.

But they’re chicken shit, and the hobnobbed fascist boots of their grandfather’s too big for the whining children.

That should be evident by the lengths ICE goes to target the least likely to be able to defend themselves and always travel in terrified cliques instead of operationally controlled groups.

And don’t even get me started on the pig farms. Overwhelming strength of materiel is not overwhelming strength of will. Killology doesn’t make warriors, it makes twitchy cowards.

Silicone tentacles dildos longer than a man’s arm bend and squish within. They do not rearrange guts, they enter guts and conform inside them, sillies. That’s how the uwu bulging occurs.

The universal end we all have is easier to jam up seeds way up there. But the other orifice that not everyone has is possible too, if trickier. But stuff up past the vagina can accommodate a monster cock dildo with some difficulty pretty deep if the owner is so inclined. It is capable of rearranging itself to birth something about as big as the Hot Lobo XXXL anyways.

A hypothetical real monster PP with the same dimensions would work slightly differently in that it would both be somewhat more able to maintain baseline rigidity, and would also probably break PP long before it broke through a diaphragm.

Doctors are being silly and their hypothetical is not based on PP physics.

Maybe an object of the pictured size with far more stabbing power than horse futa cock would actually have, like a metal pole or something I dunno.

Yes you can fit those pretty far up too, coincidentally but those wouldn’t break before they break you.

Also, use a flared base for deep insertions y’all.

Cannot take too seriously, comrades. Cannot forget the concept and reason for silly praxis.

If you make a home in other silly adjacent instances that generally mind their own business and spread the theory differently, neither the liberal capitalist nor the other natural enemy of an anarchist tends too notice much.

Both can’t read too well, only quote.

You’re arguing with yourself, while agreeing with me, while calling me up my ass?

Who’s your drug dealer, I want to meet 'em.

No, you misunderstood me. You’re not translating the blinky lights at the correct layer.

Reverse engineering requires trial and error, and graphics output requires a nuanced assessment between the values and inputs expressed by different sources that correspond to mappings ultimately upon a display interface.

A sighted person would perform this work using their eyes, because that’s the most efficient set up they literally would have the hardware handy to use.

Computers being math, and the human sense of touch being pretty dang sensitive, means that other peripherals than screens, can represent that nuance required to reverse engineer, or anything else relating to computer code.

The difficulty you imagine in not having your vision to perform a task, would not be a reality or an inherently extant limitation on this hypothetical blind programmer, in of itself.

Maybe (definitely) in the availability and pricing of good specialty peripherals, but that’s it.

The term for what you are doing and which isn’t something that requires malice, is ableism.

Now the term for making the assumption that someone is blind or visually impaired, just from a critique based on perception of facial features from a picture? That one I’m not sure what to call. Weird maybe?

I’ll risk being pedantic, because it matters and I was very careful with my prior wording, enough that if you apply the same mental trick on a re-read, maybe what I intended will land.

Phones are not allowed in some forms of high security settings for most people, because that is the response to their place in the threat profile.

The fascists have to be abide by the same concepts, and they have their own threat profiles to contend with.

Doofus pictured is breaking the easiest solution to his profile with tape, because he’s decided the convenience of having the phone outweighs the easy security of an assistant outside the secure digital perimeter standing by to relay messages, and has enough backing resources to even possibly back that hubris up.

Your comment has nothing to do with mine however.

Which is that the kind of person who needs to worry about having their camera remotely operated without their authorization, the kind of person for whom that level of care in their threat profile applies to, is no longer limited to just being the Head of Shitheads somewhere.

The technology to sort through a bunch of random cock and ball flashing random pictures to find the one time a target’s phone captured something useful six months ago, is trivial now.

All it takes to go from not having your camera turn on as a concern, to it being wise to be covering your camera nowadays and in the near future, is simply having posted the wrong memes, and having the wrong sort of app on your phone or otherwise any sort of miscalculation in your software security profile.

Your warning will not arrive in time, for enough comrades to act upon efficiently.

A “smoke out” has two mechanisms; denial of an area, and the flushing of the game towards pre-planned lanes.

With the tangle between the agreements of the 5 eyes, there are already various levels of oversight (from little rooms at AT&T, to black boxes on the intercontinental cables themselves) at the T1 level to leverage pressure even if not outright control.

With money and heavy handed laws, the T2s and T3s can and have been coerced and curtailed.

That’s just data integrity at the backbone level, before you decide if Hetzner or OVHcloud can be trusted at the moment to move the e-zines to.

Far too many comrades still transmit topics of importance over the Internet at all, and not all with the appropriate rigor, let alone selecting friendly infrastructure they can network through to without hitting the open Internet until and how they’re ready.

And what’s friendly today to host at today, will change tomorrow, and also likely swap back to being safe on Sunday, before Monday rolls around…

Resilient systems must rely on adaptive networking with these and other concerns in mind, and they must be able to react faster than the SysAdmin can sprint out of bed.

Your instance knows what it’s about and how to handle some (or most, or all, we don’t go into that here) of that, but most others don’t, by design.

Positions of responsibility are best discussed and settled at the canteen, but they also often must be undertaken by those who can recognize the need, and with explanations and a willingness to accept the reckoning for them afterwards.

That’s what separates the values of those who might nod along at your instances’ “about” information, and those who are by nature predisposed to forever crave the comforting embrace of hierarchy under a different name.

Be ready.

Remote camera activation isn’t on the standard threat profile because it’s particularly technically unfeasible.

If the device is compromised enough to enable any number of other unauthorized ingress/egress, it’s already more than likely compromised enough to activate the camera.

It’s not been a part of the standard threat profile because for a long time it would just generate a noise/signal ratio that would be operationally more arduous to sort through than any possible operational benefit it could bestow.

Further, when that concern mattered, the nation-state level actors like Mr. Genocide and his ilk didn’t’t have populaces that had begun to be acclimatized to both unwanted camera feeds, and technological over reach in exchange for the “conveniences” of digital life.

In case it’s not clear, both of those hurdles have been cleared to various levels of success, within the fascist toolkit, already.

See, the strangeness comes from the expectation that the players involved and their institutions, are separate entities which are beholden to operating with the best interests of their respective sovereign government structures.

Were this so, ambassadors to make those phone calls would have still been around and the method used in this part of the geopolitical dance choreography.

They aren’t separate entities, regardless of what the charters, laws, and mission statements say.

It is not the US and the Russian Federation’s interests that this meeting was for.

An oligarch is an Oligarch first, and a member of their natal nation-state second. I hope I don’t need to spend a whole lot of time going over the US side of the transnational Oligarchy.

But the head of the spy agency wouldn’t be discussing the effects of an attack with a foreign nation, but he would be a good messenger to send for an interdepartmental memo going over the long term strategy and the quarterly reports, from the Operations department over to the Finance department.

That is why demonizing autistic folks is important to him.

They don’t focus so much on the neurodivergent because of the extreme cases such as complete non-verbal ASD presentation or ADHD so severe the patient needs to be a ward of the state.

Those cases are about as numerous as there are trans people in our society; single digit percentages.

They focus so much on the demonization of the neurodivergent because the grand majority are entirely functional (at the cost of much chafing) within the bullshit societal paradigms as they currently stand…

But wouldn’t be, under the societal paradigms they want, and the functionally neurodivergent are, by definition, somewhat harder to model than a statistically average neurotypical presentation.

They fear the ungovernable.

You…you do know you can like…represent the blinky lights as numbers right?

A fully blind programmer could contribute to graphics driver development just fine. They don’t need to appreciate the picture rendition of the math problems they’re solving, to solve them.

Pretty sure if you went back in time and started spouting the things Mac A wrote about, he’d invite you to dinner and ask you to see yours and he’ll show you his ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )

I actually don’t know jack shit about ancient Rome’s library system, if any.

I miss that damn Pug.

But it wasn’t uncommon a trend in antiquity for the learned and educated to maintain private memoirs and journals relating to their interests.

They just never got to figure out Wikipedia.

And most of them probably sucked, we’re kinda lucky with Meditations.

I doubt that there was any sort of commonality to the rigors applied by the educated wealthy towards their “look at me, I can write and ponder about stuff because I don’t need to worry about food” projects.

Uh. Well, if we’re assuming they’re still forced to pretend?

Obstruction of justice or anything relating to impeding an investigation.

All they would need to do is just pick any of the ID hits on anything coming from an adjacent node in the network from any direction, say they had probable cause to bel–

Why the fuck am I still writing and risking giving them ideas?

The answer is just yes.

They would charge you and it would be a flimsy piece of bullshit that you might or might not escape the justice system without too much harm from. Because they still gotta pretend, but not that hard.

If things get kept to just placing bags atop them and access to them isn’t prevented utterly through whatever means, eventually they won’t have to pretend.

The duality of humankind >_>

I’m over here thinking that if you dust off the flour on the top and assuming the dense middle cooked through…

I’d take a bite, out of curiosity lol.