Defense attorneys said the use of ketamine, fentanyl and potassium chloride could cause ‘excruciating suffering’

Utah officials said on Saturday that they are scrapping plans to use an untested lethal drug combination in next month’s planned execution of a man in a 1998 murder case. They will instead seek out a drug that’s been used previously in executions in numerous states.

Defense attorneys for Taberon Dave Honie, 49, had sued in state court to stop the use of the drug combination, saying it could cause the defendant “excruciating suffering”.

The execution scheduled for 8 August would be Utah’s first since the 2010 execution of Ronnie Lee Gardner, by firing squad.

  • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    So to preface, I am absolutely and without reservation against the death penalty, so any state-sanctioned murder is unacceptable to me.

    That being said, if they’re going for painless, why not just a captive bolt stunner the their brain stem? Like, having them lie back in a massage table with a container for the blood (heaven forbid the audience should experience the discomfort of gore with their death spectacle), and just pop it when it’s time. Guaranteed to shut them off, mess is handled, suitable for a casket, and no suffering. They wouldn’t even have a chance to feel it.

    And if the thought of putting a human down like cattle is disturbing to you, good. It should be, just like any other way we would keep somebody locked up waiting to be killed.

    • mecfs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Honestly, the guillotine was the peak. Every new method since then is simply more for the viewers comfort than the actual person dyingz

    • AwesomeLowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 months ago

      Or just plain pure nitrogen. Not the way they incompetently did it a while back where the prisoner suffocated due to his own exhaled CO2, but pure nitrogen while venting his exhalations.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m also against the death penalty entirely, but I’ve always wondered why they need to be conscious. Why can’t they put them under general anesthesia, then push the chemical while they’re unconscious?

    • LordGimp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      As a welder who has been trained to be very afraid of peacefully going to sleep in a forever nap, I have never understood why inert gas asphyxiation isn’t widely used. It’s literally easier than falling asleep and you can use the same gas over and over again.

      • Lyrl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        Alabama tried that and managed to screw it up. You have to remove the carbon dioxide in the exhales to prevent the feeling of suffocation, and they didn’t provide enough nitrogen flow to do that. Took like twenty minutes of clearly desperate gasping and convulsions for the guy to pass.

    • Superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      I really agree. State sanctioned murder is unacceptable to me as well, but if they insist then let’s be humane about it.

      • Lyrl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        The problem is the very pro-death penalty camp wants the dying process - not the being dead part after - to be the punishment. The pro-humane camp is generally anti-death-penalty enough they don’t get a seat at the method-decision table.