• pelotron@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still wonder why console players allowed their online services to require subscriptions in the first place.

    • ampersandrew@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because back in the days of original Xbox and 360, it was a better service than what you got for free elsewhere.

      • That, and it was slightly more justifiable when these companies were first setting up and operating networks for the services and matchmaking. Economies of scale should have nullified that by now, though.

        The other big one I don’t see people mentioning, but that I remember clearly, was that if you wanted to use Netflix on 360, you had to pay for Live. I think that, above anything else in my friend group, was the move that normalized paying for online services on a console.

        • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          i miss when you could watch netflix with your avatar and invite friends to watch with you. only got to do it one time ever

          • Juno@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Idk about with your avatar, but I still have movie nights with friends that I stream things to over Discord and Emby (like plex)

            I literally just finished a “movie classic” night with a friend in New York where we watched ALIENS together and chatted about how awesome Sigourney Weaver’s performance is. 👏 🍿

            It might be interesting to do it with little Wii characters, but we had fun regardless.

            • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              yeah xbox used to have a feature where you watch netflix with a friend, and it even had theater seats and your avatar at the bottom of the screen and you could do emotes and stuff

              • Omegamanthethird@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think some apps have that, minus the avatars. I want to say Disney+ lets you sync with your friend so you watch it simultaneously.

    • mayo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it was a choice. Xbox did it first and that’s why I bought a ps3. Then sony introduced it. Then nintendo. It’s still less expensive than a PC hobby. Consumers don’t have much say in what these companies do or how they operate.

      • Poggervania@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s still less expensive than a PC hobby

        Only if you plan on either never paying for an online sub for the console or paying for an online sub for less than 5 years on the console, and also take into consideration that a PC can both game and be a computer you can use for other things.

        A gaming PC has a higher upfront cost, but it’s a better long-term value. Let’s say you buy a PS5 for $500, and then pay for 5 years of PS+ for the old price, $60. That’s $800 for a friggin console already, but let’s also consider that most people either have a laptop or a tablet for doing computer-related tasks. Reasonable people would pay probably somewhere in the $400-$600 range, but let’s give the console a chance and say we got a $400 laptop. That’s $1200 now.

        Using that $1200 as a budget, you can get a computer with a 4060ti, a 12th gen i5, a 1TB NVME SSD, and 16GB RAM for around $1100. Note that, say, 5 years down the line from buying this PC, you can just swap in and out parts as you want and be able to sell old parts for some money back, so staying up-to-date to play whatever current games can be cheaper too depending on the part prices.

        • metaridley@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also anecdotally parts seem to be lasting much longer than they used to. Maybe I’m just playing fewer games, maybe I care about graphics less, or maybe there actually is a technical reason but in the early 00s when I first started building computers I was essentially forced to upgrade about every 2 or 3 years but now I’m still running on my 7 year old desktop with a 1070 – I was going to upgrade the graphics card but the crypto mining boom priced me out and lo and behold I’m still able to play whatever I want with nary a difficulty. Even Baldur’s Gate 3 runs just fine, with a little chugging.

          • ampersandrew@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            The percentage of the industry that can afford to push modern graphics to their limit has only shrunk over time as the development time required to make games that taxing has increased. That’s why most of what you play isn’t particularly high-spec.

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Need to add a good quality mouse and keyboard to your numbers at minimum. Consoles come with controllers.

          Should also add a $99 Windows license too.

          • Poggervania@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ok. Logitech G203 for $20 and a Redragon K552 for $45 - a tiny bit cheaper than a PS5 controller which retails at $70 before tax.

            Windows you can literally get for free from Microsoft directly. You’re basically paying a license to get rid of the “Activate Windows” bit and to be able to change wallpapers, but functionally you can play games and do computer things with an unactivated Windows license. You can also opt to play on Linux instead since Steam offers Proton with their Linux version, and you can also use WINE for games that won’t run on Proton. Linux is also free.

            • phillaholic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Those are not in the same quality tier at all, at least include a wireless rechargeable mouse.

              Consoles don’t have licensing issues with their OS. You can’t run every PC game issue free on steam OS or Linux.

              • Chinzon@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                You know, you see thus argument every so often online. I’ve had an excellent and subscription free Linux gaming experience over the last three years. If you enjoy console gaming and getting nickel and dimed for increasingly shitty online services then power to you

              • Poggervania@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Now you’re just arguing in bad faith lol.

                If you want a mouse with a good sensor for competitive games and a linear switch mechanical keyboard with NKRO, those are generally the two best entry-level options. Rechargeable wireless mice can be a bit pricey, which is why I’m assuming you used a vague descriptor of “quality” and specifically mentioned it just for the sake of being arbitrarily on par with what a PS5 offers. But if you want a good budget option for a wireless gaming mouse, you can with a Logitch G305 for around $50.

                As for the OS stuff, that’s a good point, and it’s true - if you’re talking about 5 or so years ago. Once Steam said “hey, we’re integrating Proton into our Linux version of Steam”, it’s been leaps and bounds in improvements for Linux gaming. By the way, fun fact: the PS4 used FreeBSD for the system’s OS which is based off Unix - and surprise, Linux is also based off Unix. Wouldn’t be surprised if the PS5 OS is also based on FreeBSD.

                • phillaholic@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How is that a bad faith argument? The PS5 Controller is not entry level quality. It’s not my problem equivalent PC peripherals are expensive. My Razer Viper Wireless cost $150 and the build quality is just slightly worse than a Dual Sense. It’s built to be lighter weight so that’s understandable. But it’s twice the cost, and that doesn’t include a keyboard. I tried the G305 and didn’t care for the build quality personally. Equivalent wireless keyboards with the quality control of Sony are $80-$100 too. I’d probably cheap out on the keyboard before the mouse, but every keyboard I’ve used under $85 had Quality control issues from switches stop functioning to buggy software (Anne Pro II), and Wireless was terrible on all of them.

                  I’ve heard issues dealing with multiplayer and anti-cheat as recently as this summer, so it’s nice to see it’s better, but until games are officially supported with no third party patches or workarounds, I don’t count it.

                  PS5 is FreeBSD based, so yes it’s Unix-like. But that doesn’t mean anything. MacOS is also Unix-Like and it’s terrible for gaming. It all comes down to support. At the end of the day I don’t want to have to deal with drivers, or configurations to play a game. I want to press a button, and start gaming. For me personally Consoles are going to win that war 95% of the time. But I’m dumb. I spent almost 3 times the cost of a PS5 on a Graphics card last year for some reason.

              • Sas [she/her]@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You also can’t run every PC game on a console… Because they’re not available there. What even is that argument?

                • phillaholic@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I wouldn’t claim pc games run on consoles. It’s *nix users trying to claim all PC games that’s the problem.

                • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not everyone plays at a desk. It’s crazy easy to play PC games in your living on your giant TV.

          • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If love to know who these people are that pay for windows. I think 95 was the last time that I know of anyone doing it. Maybe XP.

              • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Considering piracy equivalent to hardware theft is just intellectually dishonest. In a lot of ways, but relevant to this discussion is that piracy is way less risky, so more people do it. If you try to steal a PS5 from a store I’d go as far to say you’d probably get caught and jailed. With piracy you almost definitely won’t get caught.

        • mayo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think this debate can get lost in the numbers when it’s more about the user. For some people that upfront cost is going to make sense, for others it won’t. The math isn’t the hard part. Specifically though, a PC hobby isn’t exactly a cheap hobby.

          • arefx@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Gaming in general isn’t a cheap hobby. You can get a 320$ steam deck, dock it and plug it into an old monitor add a cheap KB and mouse and you are PC gaming. Or you can spend 3,200$ on a top of the line rig. Its whatever you want to make of it. I wouldnt say its more expensive than console gaming, but you can make it one and you will get a better experience for it. Either way personally I would consider PC the best option by a fairly large margin.

        • Omegamanthethird@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, I’m still using my $200 laptop from 7 years ago for my basic computer needs. And that doesn’t seem like it’s going to change soon. Also, someone who buys a gaming PC is likely going to have a cheap laptop to do their basic computer stuff still.

          Also, I get my subscription for $40 on sale, mostly for the games and discounts. So it really just pays for itself in the games I get from it.

      • Gordon_Freeman@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s still less expensive than a PC hobby

        just with the sales and free online/cloudsaves PCs are cheaper in the long run

        And mods are an added value, we can even include fanmade patches that fix what developers don’t into that added value

        Consumers don’t have much say in what these companies do or how they operate.

        Yes, they do. Microsoft tried to incorporate Xbox live onto PC and it was a failure because PC consumers didn’t bought it

        The same goes with paid mods, Valve and Bethesda tried to make people buy mods and it was rejected by the consumer so the have to backtrack.

        Consumers have all the power in their wallet they decide what course the companies take. If a company does something that goes against your interests as consumer is as easy as stop giving them money, if you hurt them economically, they’ll have to go back to the business model that gave them profits (this works only if the average consumer is intelligent enough to protect their own interest/rights)

        • any1there@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Used or loaned games (provided you have libraries offering them in your area) are still a huge benefit for (most, ie physical media “enabled”) consoles.

          The subscription model is broken by default, regardless of Sony, Microsoft or Nintendo, and is only good and cheap until it isn’t anymore.

          Agreed that consumers have a say, to some extent, however some are too far “into the ecosystem” to either care or be willing to boycott or make a change that would inconvenience them, so they’d rather give in.

          • Poggervania@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            100% agree with that, but even then the sharing of physical media seems like it’s being slowly replaced with sharing digital libraries. PS4 allows a hokey way of sharing libraries between two people, and Steam does offer a similar janky way of sharing libraries between multiple people. With GOG, you should be able to download a standalone installer on a USB and then give that to a friend (which now I think about it, is the PC equivalent of lending your friend the disc lol).

            Wondering how long it will be until people go “remember when we used to share discs with each other?”

            • any1there@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh absolutely, I know I’m already part of a minority when I favour physical over digital media.
              We’re likely seeing the last (or, more realistically, second to last?) generation of consoles with physical media as an option and that’s a bummer…
              GOG is great on the PC side of things, but as someone with a Steam Deck as their only PC, it isn’t always the best option (some games have been giving me a headache or end up straight up not working - eg I’ve had to rebuy Gris because the GOG version would show a white screen with any version of Proton I tried, while the Steam version was perfectly fine).

        • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          just with the sales and free online/cloudsaves PCs are cheaper in the long run

          This may be true, but then i think this is just annother example of how it is more expensive to be poor. Even if PCs are cheaper in the long run, it’s hard to scrounge up the $1000+ upfront to buy a worthwhile PC if you’re living paycheck-to-paycheck. Over 60% of Americans live paycheck-to-paycheck. If you are living that way, it’s much easier to come up with the $300-500 for a console (in the US, that’s an average tax refund amount), and then the $15 a month for gamepass/PS plus. And don’t tell me you can buy a lowend PC for that price - any PC you buy for $500 is gonna play games worse than the comparable console.

          In cases where our only power is in our wallet, people with bigger wallets will be the only ones with actual power.

            • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              yes of course, we all know Best Buy accepts common sense as payment when you don’t have enough money for that 4060 🙃

                • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s not common sense, that’s a common false judgement applied to people with less means - it’s a value judgement and diminishes their struggle. This is a reminder to be nice on our instance.

      • ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you use your PC for anything other than gaming then it’s not more expensive.

        Laptop + Console costs about the same as a Desktop PC. The MacBook + Console combo I see a lot is even more expensive than a PC.

        • escapesamsara@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you’re vastly underestimating how cheap most computers are; consumer laptops are around $300-500 median, that’s what most people use. And those laptops don’t game. The enthusiast computer market, while larger than its ever been, is still a ridiculously small percentage of computers sold.

  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    You might pay for a subscription-based future, but I will stay on PC where this sort of nonsense is not tolerated.

    • snowbell@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll never understand how console peeps can justify paying for online access as a necessary thing.

        • snowbell@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve never known any different but it still always felt like paying twice to the Internet to me. My first console with online connection was an Xbox which required Live. Before that they just didn’t have any network connectivity at all.

            • snowbell@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              My parents never would have got me something like that just for one or two games.

              • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I know, I got the GC adapter hoping to have multiplayer Mario or Metroid games. So imagine my surprise when those never came.(I was more PC gamer back then and multiplayer is already plenty.)

          • Jacoolh@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            True, I paid for it on the 360 back in the day to play Gears and Rainbow 6 Vegas. Haven’t since I’ve had a PC.

        • flamingarms@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s also the only option if you want to play online with friends and don’t have an expensive PC.

            • flamingarms@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Right, but as so many other threads have acknowledged, not everyone is capable of paying a large upfront cost to save them in the long-term. That’s one example of why it’s more expensive to be broke. That’s why I’m responding to these comments - it’s not all ignorance or stupidity; people are broke out here.

          • fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Cloud gaming is where it’s at. $10/month gets you access to an enterprise class rig with a 3080 card.

            • d3Xt3r@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              $10

              I’m assuming you’re talking about GeForce Now? If so, don’t they have the problem of being able to play only limited number of games?

                • d3Xt3r@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I just checked this page and none of the games that I’m playing currently are on it (Diablo 4, Elden Ring, God of War, Jedi Survivor etc). It’s not like the games I’m playing are obscure or brand new either. Not to mention some of the console exclusives that I’m also playing, like TotK on the Switch and Horizon FW on the PS5, but of course, I understand that the cloud provider can do nothing about that.

                  Don’t get me wrong, I’m quite enthusiastic about cloud gaming as well and looked seriously into it a while ago, because I wanted to upgrade my PC but the upgrade costs were looking pretty high (this was during the peak of the supply chain issues during COVID), also I wanted to break out of the constant and expensive upgrade cycles.

                  But everything I looked at had some or the other limitation, either they didn’t have the games that I was playing, or the service wasn’t available in my country (eg Shadow PC), or it didn’t allow you to bring your own games (Stadia), or it was working out to be too expensive (Azure VM), or had other limitations such as not supporting ultra-wide resolutions at 60+ FPS. I think for me, being able to play my own games is a big fan requirement for it to work, and the pricing of things like Shadow could work out for me, but those sort of services have limited availability, and rolling your own VM on a public cloud can turn very expensive if you’re a heavy gamer, as I’ve experienced first-hand in Azure.

                  Therefore, IMO, cloud gaming, while is the future, just isn’t there yet.

      • SirSauceLordtheThird@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Coming from someone whos never had to play for online play, i understand it cause the main driving force for someone to get x console over p console is what their friends have. The amount of ppl who only own a playstation to play COD with their friends is staggering, and moving all their friends to pc is a big task.

    • hansl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll stay on NES where once you get a game that’s the game, bugs and all. No DLC, expansion, nothing. That’s the game.

    • MJBrune@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      … Humble monthly? Game pass? EA play? Even PS Plus has subscriptions for streaming to a PC. People buy these things a lot. You can try to excuse Humble monthly but there are far more game pass players than Humble monthly ones. Either way, you can pretend that PC doesn’t tolerate this nonsense but many people are playing Starfield on Game Pass this month. PC players already tolerate this and in some cases, welcome it.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those aren’t the same or similar. Those are options in addition to buying that allow access to a large library of games (except humble, which is just buying games). They aren’t “pay this subscription or you can’t play the game you bought”.

    • Gogo Sempai@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Until hardware manufacturers like Nvidia and Intel start getting thirsty and lock features behind a subscription :/ Only $10.99 a month to use those RTX cores, $7.99 for DLSS.

  • Plap plap 𓁑𓂸 @lemmyf.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I realized the only game I play online is FFXIV, which doesn’t require PS+. I almost never play the “free” games they add to the service, and spend a non-zero amount of time browsing said free games in an effort to find something to play rather than something in my backlog. So I just canceled.

    My membership is up in December and I doubt I’ll even notice when it’s gone.

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Price rises aren’t welcome and the latest one does seem quite high. However I’ve been paying for plus since I got my PS4 and I’m still ok with it. Considering I maybe buy one game every two years for the price of another triple A game a year I’ve built up quite a library. The hours my partner has put into Spiritfarer, Slay the Spire and Hades indicates it’s still providing good value. Every month we at least check out the new games unless it’s a survival horror.

        If I have one complaint it’s since I got off the CoD train as I got older when I do occasionally dip into the free ones via plus I find it very hard to find any online matches. I assume this is because all the hardcore players move pretty quickly to the current iteration leaving the lobbies of the older games empty.

    • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here, I set to cancel renew every time I top up and since late ps4 time I don’t even add free games that are remotely interesting so I keep a cleaner library. And then when they announced the hike, I did the review and filter by games acquired via plus, same feeling, I almost never play those games, even though they look somewhat interesting and added them but probably never gonna play them since my primary interest and good backlog will last me long enough for next main games to release. So they will have the same treatment like my humble bundle games. And I also decide to not top up any more.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The point is to get the GamePass like tier.

      For the price of 2 games (or 1 and a half if it goes on sale, and it always did before), you can game all year. I’ve had mine for a year now, and not bought a game for it yet (apart from GoW Ragnarok which came bundled with it, and likely BG3 next week).

      The top tier is kind of a bust. I picked it up because I thought I might play those PS1/2 games but I haven’t used that at all. There’s plenty of PS4 and 5 games still to play, and you can emulate up to PS3 on PC quite easily if you want to play old stuff. There’s scant few PS1 games anyway. It’s far from comprehensive. They should have done so much better here.

      • supercheesecake@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This. And if you have kids that just want a large catalogue of random games, it’s perfect.

        Doesn’t seem many people commenting here like the idea. But for me personally, and my family situation, saves me heaps of money.

        • Alex@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah my kids don’t have gaming PCs (yet?) but have fun playing through a bunch of the plus stuff when they are not on Minecraft or (shudder) Roblox on their tablets.

        • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t have kids but I still find the random assortment of games a value add as I got a lot of games I would have considered anyway, so this was a much cheaper way of playing those games, best is all the random local multiplayer games that I can install for when I have friends over

    • Bri Guy @sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depending on the tier you also get a library of free games which is honestly kinda nice, but that’s pretty much it.

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was going to consider Assassin’s Creed Mirage on PC instead of PS5. Then they announced it wouldn’t be available on Steam. Now I won’t consider it on PC and likely won’t get it at all in any format.

    There are reasons PC gaming is still stupid, and it’s mostly various companies fault.

    • MarioSpeedWagon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah that’s on Ubisoft. Third party launchers are always stupid. I bought Splinter Cell Blacklist a while ago and couldn’t get it to act right with their stupid Ubisoft connect or Uplay or whatever so I just returned it.

      But the worst is how I bought splinter cell conviction years ago via steam, and can’t even play it anymore because of how they shittily implemented their DRM/launcher. Not buying any more games from them. Used to be my favorite dev back in the day.

  • ampersandrew@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’re not really headed to a subscription-based future. People like Game Pass, but it has no exclusive content. Nintendo’s the only one trying to make a catalog of games exclusive to their service, but they’re all retro games, and Nintendo can get bent, because we can all pirate and emulate those games better than Nintendo can rent them to us. They could get be getting some revenue from actually selling those old games to customers in the places they want to play those games, but Nintendo isn’t interested in that. If this particular situation gets worse, then I might be worried. There’s just too much diversity in the game industry for this to be a threat. There’s no central cartel or representative group for games the way there is in movies and music to dictate those markets away from what the customer actually wants. In video games, you can switch to Xbox or, more likely, PC when Sony raises prices. PCs have gotten easier, and they’ve always been more open, and I think the gaming market has demonstrated that they value the openness.

  • sculd@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nope. I did not subscribe to PS+ and probably never will unless I really want to play an online game there, which I find unnecessary at this point.

  • Thelgor@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, not from me. When money’s tight, shit like this is the first to go. I have no issues skipping multiplayer on my PS system.

  • dillekant@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re not paying for it, you’re the product.

    Wait no… it seems like capitalists will charge for whatever they can get away with. Those bastards!