i should be gripping rat

  • 387 Posts
  • 798 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle



  • What does “witch hunt” even mean anymore? I feel like it has been overused to the point of losing all meaning. In this case, by “witch hunt”, the writer means “they have started going too far and making some bad calls”. They aren’t calling for people to mount heads on spikes or review bomb, as far as I can tell.

    It’s a strange case, though. Who do we think follows these curators? The title of the list is in Ukrainian, so I’d guess it’s mostly Ukrainians. On the one hand, I don’t want to tell Ukrainian folks how to spend their money with respect to Russia. Maybe for some, even the slightest whiff of Russia will turn them off from the game, regardless of how logical it is. It’s not my busieness to question the mostly-harmless emotional reaction of a people under siege. For those, these curation lists might still be useful. Of course, people that care this much would probably research another way if the curator lists didn’t exist.

    For others, I’m sure they would prefer a curator list that actually does the research and doesn’t list a game unless the purchase would very clearly benefit Russia in tax dollars. For those, this turn of events is unfortunate. On the other hand, those people are probably level-headed enough to do their own research on a game-by-game basis.

    My point is: the impact of these curator lists existing is probably minimal. But maybe i’m wrong, idk. What do y’all think?




  • they DID add those crossover decks recently, and the dev has indicated that there is more additional content coming. Idk, I think having the cards in HD wouldn’t look right, because the entire game has a specific kind of pixel art. Even the smooth, swirly background has a pixel art filter on it, bc that’s the vibe that the dev really wants the game to have. Mixing them would be like when pixel art rpgs have super hi-res fonts. It just doesn’t fit right.







  • I didn’t know about this! It’s definitely interesting as a survey of queer folks, but given how few respondents were cis, definitely seems like the census is reaching a specific crowd.

    The author says as much:

    This all leads us to my never-ending problem: selection bias. The survey is 100% online, and spread entirely by word of mouth and social media shares.

    So it certainly doesn’t mean that the survey doesn’t have value, but it would be interesting to see this survey with with a more generalized reach. But maybe my interest is rooted in my bias as a cis person. As is, still really cool to get some actual data on the overall trends for pronouns and self-labels and all that!