I liked his opening where he referenced pop culture and then related it to a current phenomenon, but I found his leap from that to using Lacanian philosophy to support a mainstream liberal viewpoint quite specious and it made me question why I would even bother reading it in the first place.
I did not read this, so here is my review:
I liked his opening where he referenced pop culture and then related it to a current phenomenon, but I found his leap from that to using Lacanian philosophy to support a mainstream liberal viewpoint quite specious and it made me question why I would even bother reading it in the first place.