Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said Saturday that one of his top priorities, once he takes control of the chamber’s Social Security Subcommittee in January, will be to lift the cap on taxable income that funds the program and increase benefit payments by at least $2400 per year.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Top priority should be removing the cap on deductions so it’s funded.

    Then once the wealthy are paying into it, increase payments.

    • YourBestFriend@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We could probably spend less money on the baby killing machine that makes psychopath soldiers.

      • freagle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 hours ago

        What!? And let our military shrink to only 600% the size of the next largest military ?

        • YourBestFriend@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s funny how some people, (not you frisbird) who claim to be lefties and say they hate Trump, go ape shit the moment you touch the military budget.

          Fucking posers.

          “I needed education in my shitty country so I killed people but that makes me okay because my country is shitty! I’m innocent”

          Why is there no guillotine emoji?

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        We can obviously spend less on the military, but that’s not how OASDI is funded…

        You also don’t know anything about the military apparently

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          They can free up that money and allocate it elsewhere.

          ETA Pentagon never passed an audit.

            • YourBestFriend@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I always check account ages. Anything your age is suspiciously part of the problem.

              Enjoy the country you definitely fought to make like this.

              🚫

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                34 minutes ago

                Enjoy the country you definitely fought to make like this.

                So now I fought against the American military?

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    14 minutes ago

    Yes, let’s make seniors, the most coddled generation in history, our first priority.

    Edit: I’m not saying we shouldn’t do this. I’m saying it’s obvious that boomer seniors, as a generation, are the most privileged people in this country’s history, both because of economic environment and by government benefits across their life span.

    Don’t shoot the messenger.

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s certainly a take I suppose.

      But yeah, let’s not shore up Social Security for all Americans including future generations to be able to not go homeless after they suffer a disability or worked until their bodies are broken and just keep the future generations working until they die at work.

      Sounds like a great plan there, let’s be short sighted to be a petty bitch.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I’m not. You’re intrepreting me as saying I don’t think we should raise SS. I think we should. I’m asking why it should be the first priority. You reply we should do it first to prevent homelessness–so you are introducing an issue that is more important.

            • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              36 minutes ago

              First off, let’s get the wording clear here. The statement was “one of his top priorities” not first priority.

              Second, if you think that we should remove the cap off of social security then we’re done here. You, think that the removal of the cap is necessary, I think it’s necessary, Sanders thinks it’s necessary. We’re all in agreement, huzzah! The fact that if it’s first, second, third, which again was not the wording being used, is moot outside of your disdain of the elderly.

    • ° 。Juniper 。°@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Young people receive social security benefits too, like SSDI and survivor payments. I’ve been on SSDI myself since before I was 30 years old.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’ve been on, too. But why are people with plenty of assistance already the first priority? Just seems weird and indicative of leadership ignoring younger generation’s problems and prioritizing boomers, but I’m not against it, of course.

        • ° 。Juniper 。°@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Honestly $200 extra a month might help ease the burden on our loved ones, that’s only two weeks of groceries for a lot of households right now. Just a personal example, the entirety of my grandmother’s benefits goes to her housing (high cola). My uncle pays her medical bills, and he’s the only one who has any money to spare. My sibling buys her groceries. I buy her clothing and other necessities as I can, but I’m essentially in the same financial situation she is. The rest of her family is dead, and in 3-5 years she may only have my sibling left to help her.

          So, yes, Bernie might be slapping a bandaid on this elderly poverty problem with a possibly easy win, but it’s a starting point for further taxing the billionaires. And if we’re lucky the momentum from that will also fix education, medical access, housing, and the rest of what we know we need as a healthy society

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It’s not really taxing billionaires since SS taxes income on labor, but I agree, it’s necessary to do, along with a long list of other things that need more involved legislative scaffolding.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Then you should know better. Keep the TAC tax on social security income, for payments over a certain amount.

          Crappy Auto-Incorrect

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      We could do this and all the other things at the same time. If this is one thing on a laundry list of fixes, would you object to it just because you aren’t getting social security yet? Singling out an aid for people to not get because of who they are and/or because you won’t get that benefit is what we complain about with MAGA.

      I put this next to the quote from veterans who say “I don’t agree with what you say, but I fought for your rights to say it.” I’m right with you on blaming Boomers for where we are and why, but I’ll still support making sure old people don’t have to decide between rent, meds, or food. Even if some of them are hypocrites who made the world this way after being handed everything.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’m onboard, too, just wondering what it means that it’s the first priority. I hope it’s just that it’s the easiest way to help the most people in the least time.