I know there are tools that supposedly make it harder for AI to be trained on your images. But what about text or code? Is there any way to share things outside of a small group while minimizing the risk that some fucker will scrape them or otherwise use them for building an LLM?

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 days ago

    glue traps are a good solution to badly-behaved scrapers. just list a path in your robots.txt that slowly produces random text and links, all of which go to the same sort of page. if they respect robots.txt, they’re fine. if they don’t, they get stuck ingesting nonsense.

    not a catch-all solution but a good tool.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      AFAIK it was a glue trap / tarpit that one guy I know tried. Sure, it did result in the scraper getting a lot of useless data. OTOH, they dedicated massive resources to trying to get those non-existent documents, so his website was effectively DDOSed as a result. That’s why he’s now blocking entire countries.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        yeah slowing down access and using a cheap generation method is important there.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Even that isn’t enough if they respond to that by just throwing more crawlers at your site.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            yeah it’s not the only thing you want on there of course. i run a tarpit, fail2ban, and anubis.

            • merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              Yeah, at one point he posted that fail2ban was only able to ban about 20 IPs/second, but he was getting 200 requests per second, and the bans weren’t having a meaningful impact on that (i.e. the requests were all coming from different IPs). From what I remember, his system load was over 1000.

                • merc@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I think it was running on a VPS, but I’m not sure. As for the traffic, I think it was coming from all over. Amazon-owned netblocks, mysterious ones that were hard to trace, etc.