The decline of Europe is not inevitable, despite how much Americans love to joke/proclaim that the continent is doomed to become an open-air museum. Sure, it's possible that things have to get worse before they get better, but believing that "it's over" is just loser talk. It's never over, but the old world also won't recover by itself...
Reeducation centers ideally located in immigrant ghettos so they can correct the wrong of forcing refugees into under-served areas with no industry or legal way to improve one’s situation their politics brought about.
And as those ghettos would contain zero immigrants but only the finest of fine white people, there would be absolutely zero crime and other problems. Either that or the whole premise is completely wrong, but I wouldn’t even think of that.
I don’t see where you’re going with this, reeducation required eventual reintegration, making these people see and correct the systemic injustice they created as part of this seems both practical and moral.
I’m going to them realizing that they are the problem and not everybody else. They think all the problems come from migrants. Let’s remove that variable and check if they are right. Not by removing the migrants, but by removing them from society.
Thing is: there’s a few migrants causing most of the issues, but because the rules are so protective, we can’t get rid of these few assholes, so now people want to get rid of all migrants.
If we were able to get rid of the few asshole migrants, things would not be the issue they are today.
Social constructs aren’t illegitimate wtf? Just because sonething has no root in biology doesn’t mean its not important for understanding history and existing systems.
What if we just cleansed it of nazis?
Yes, let’s do that. Where should we send them?
The grave
They don’t deserve one, put them in a field and call the crows
Reeducation centers ideally located in immigrant ghettos so they can correct the wrong of forcing refugees into under-served areas with no industry or legal way to improve one’s situation their politics brought about.
And as those ghettos would contain zero immigrants but only the finest of fine white people, there would be absolutely zero crime and other problems. Either that or the whole premise is completely wrong, but I wouldn’t even think of that.
I don’t see where you’re going with this, reeducation required eventual reintegration, making these people see and correct the systemic injustice they created as part of this seems both practical and moral.
I’m going to them realizing that they are the problem and not everybody else. They think all the problems come from migrants. Let’s remove that variable and check if they are right. Not by removing the migrants, but by removing them from society.
Thing is: there’s a few migrants causing most of the issues, but because the rules are so protective, we can’t get rid of these few assholes, so now people want to get rid of all migrants.
If we were able to get rid of the few asshole migrants, things would not be the issue they are today.
Its funny how commies like you would kill for words and still somehow think they have moral grounds
The person suggesting reeducation and reintegration is someone else, if that’s who you meant to respond to
Your comment confuses me, but I bet I’m still less confused than you are.
Just remember kids: Race is not a legitimate concept. There is no “black race” or “white race”, and if you still believe that: You’re a Racist.
Social constructs aren’t illegitimate wtf? Just because sonething has no root in biology doesn’t mean its not important for understanding history and existing systems.