The community is called childfree, you’d think everyone here would be at least somewhat opposed to the concept of having children.

  • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    28 days ago

    There is a surprising amount of antinatalism here. Apparently people just want the human race to end.

    • TheDarkQuark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      I do want the human race to end though. Not painfully, but rather phasing out gradually (although I do realize that antinatalism is such an unpopular opinion that it isn’t really possible). No hate for children or any other being though. I just want there to be less suffering.

        • TheDarkQuark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          Not sure what you mean by that. Neither I nor antinatalism advocates for ending existent life. It is just about not causing additional suffering by bringing new beings into existence.

          If anything, I believe that we should acknowledge that we are all in this suffering together, and be compassionate to fellow living beings.

          • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            It’s the logical conclusion of antinatalism. All life “suffers”. If you stop bringing new beings into the world that can experience suffering then you’re advocating for no life at all after this current generation.

            And yes I fully support compassion and empathy, but you can do that while also sustaining the human race and life as we know it.

            • TheDarkQuark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              27 days ago

              Got it. Thanks for clearing that up. I thought you were talking about antinatalists ending existent life.

              Yes, in the ideal scenario, I think it is best to “end” all life, via gradually phasing out of existence. I think that would cause minimal suffering. I do not realistically think that it could happen in the next generation (or in any generation owing to how extreme and controversial it is perceived by the general population).

              Sure, you can be compassionate and empathetic to existing beings, but I see not bringing new beings out of empathy (due to the potentiality of their guaranteed suffering) to be more moral and a purer form of the trait.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        yeah im with you here. Also if the population and balance goes far down enough people would start having children again. We just have to get back to that level.

    • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      I dream about it. Like, if a fungus infected all of mand kind, and suddenly we all stopped reproducing because the fungus made our brains not want it, what would happen? Would we take care of eachother until the last ond dies? Would we ever identify the fungus and slove it?

      so many thoughts