• JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      I understand that it’s very useful to demonstrate your listening skills by restating their opinions back, then check with them to see if you’re stating things correctly.

      After a certain amount of that, in which some trust is built up, I suppose one could then apply a bit of the Socratic method here and there.

        • 𝙈𝙞𝙖@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          Every experience I’ve had with this stuff sees the person reverting back once they go back to their regular programming. So often people come around and agree stuff is bad and the next day go back to repeating it that I no longer bother, they’re rarely ever sincere.

  • amzd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    “White Right: Meeting the Enemy” changed my mind on this. Multiple white suprematists in that documentary change their ways after they made a friend who is incompatible with their world view.

  • ActualGrapesTasteGreen@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    I am not so selfish that I only care about how the people around me treat me. You gotta put some good into the world if you want to be in my life. Otherwise good luck with things over there, on your own.

  • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    If your beliefs are rooted in the intolerable: denying someone’s rights, existence, or harming them, then you do not have to be tolerated.

    And that’s how you solve the tolerance paradox.

  • Sinthesis@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    That list is a little short but I guess it does have to fit on a cheek (thx AI!) and its a start.