“Kenny just began to gasp for air repeatedly and the execution took about 25 minutes total.”

Pretty compassionate way to kill a person.

Once again, the Law in the south is brutal.

    • JdW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The state does not care whether they are innocent as well, and that callousness is just as bad from the eyes of people living in a civilized society…

      • 52fighters@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m pretty sure this guys’s guilt was beyond dispute. States have so many appeals and checks on capital punishment that it is much, much cheaper to default to life in prison. The economic argument isn’t noble but should be included in the debate.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s estimated that 4% of prisoners on death row are innocent. Sure, we’re certain about this guy, but that’s the case for those 4%, as well.

          • 52fighters@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s a good argument for increasing the threshold of guilt for capital crimes. But of those legitimately and obviously guilty, do they owe a debt equal to their own life for murdering someone else?

            • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              How does their death pay for that debt? There is no compensation, no restitution has been made, nothing else is corrected. So, why?

              • 52fighters@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                It would be restoration by proxy. I once had a friend who stole money. He did not know the person and could never find him again. To make restoration he gave an equal amount plus reasonable interest to a charity, anonymously. The charity was a proxy for the man from whom he stole.

                • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  So, was the restoration something he lost, or something he returned to someone else? Would it have been restoration if he just burned the money instead of giving the money to someone?

      • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Woah there, kiddo. It appears you haven’t learned how crime and punishment works. You see, there are varying degrees of crimes, and thus- varying degrees of punishment.

        This is why shoplifters aren’t executed.

        Hopefully this simple reference will keep you from embarrassing yourself in the future.

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Civilian murderers also have justifications for their actions. I accept those justifications just as much as I do those of the State murderers.

    • Steak@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      This place is so stupid sometimes they’d fight for the rights of their own families murderer’s. No point in trying to put facts in front of people like that. They’ve made their decision.

      • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh I know. I’d be surprised none of them reported my comment simply because they disagree with it. Lemmy LOVES being outraged.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Seems Lemmy also loves coming to conclusions on people they know nothing about.

              So how is what I said about you being outraged different from what you said about “Lemmy” being outraged?

              • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Because I’m showing no indications of actually being outraged, and Lemmy does tens of thousands of times daily.

                That’s how.

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I’d be surprised none of them reported my comment simply because they disagree with it

                  You sound pretty outraged.

                  • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    I can assure you, you’re reading into it wrong. Reread it again- and imagine it coming from someone that doesn’t give a shit whether or not it happens- but that they meant what they said about not being surprised- because I guarantee that it’s been reported.

                    Now I’m going to add some smiley emojis to emphasize the point as that’s apparently how people understand things now.

                    😆😆😆😆😂😂😂😂😂😂😁😆😆😀