LukM to En panne de sensEnglish · 2 months agoWhen AI is more expensive than people, why replace the people?www.telegraph.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down12
arrow-up132arrow-down1external-linkWhen AI is more expensive than people, why replace the people?www.telegraph.co.ukLukM to En panne de sensEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square12linkfedilink
minus-squareAkasazh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoPeople are nasty, they get ill, get mad when you extort them and go on strikes. They want a fully automated money machine but don’t understand that the people they are sacking are the ones doing the buying.
minus-squaresieralinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoYeah, they love money and hate other human that could take part of this money. But they forgot that they are human too.
minus-squareInucune@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoSee, the trick is to automate your workforce. Your customers come from the other guy’s workforce so you keep making money. AI can’t do your job, right?
People are nasty, they get ill, get mad when you extort them and go on strikes.
They want a fully automated money machine but don’t understand that the people they are sacking are the ones doing the buying.
Yeah, they love money and hate other human that could take part of this money. But they forgot that they are human too.
See, the trick is to automate your workforce. Your customers come from the other guy’s workforce so you keep making money. AI can’t do your job, right?