• TachyonTele@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    5 months ago

    Huh, guy did a …couple things

    I’m surprised they didn’t just rename mathamatics after him and be done with it

    • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      5 months ago

      Eulerology? Eulerhythmics? Eultonics? Euleronomics?

      Maybe we should go back a step and give science to the scientologists, and make science Euler centric. No more scientists, now all Eulerists. They Eule night and day solving the worlds fundamental mysteries.

    • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      To be fair, they kind of already did rename all of mathematics after a guy, Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi, who wrote the book “al-Kitāb al-Mukhtaṣar fī Ḥisāb al-Jabr wal-Muqābalah” or, in a Latin bastardization: Al Goritmi, author of Al-Jabr.

      You know him because his name is the word “Algorithm”, and his book was so revolutionary that we named the entire branch of mathematics it covered after it: “Algebra”

        • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Well, the wikipedia page for both Al-Khwarizmi and algebra both disagree with you, as does the wiki page for Geber, and, oh yeah, the journal of the history of mathematics: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hm.2006.02.006

          “It is well known that our word “algebra” derives ultimately from the Arabic al-jabr, which is part of the name al-jabr wa’l-muq¯abala given to the art of algebra in medieval times. Further, the individual words al-jabr and al-muq¯abala are associated with two steps in the simplification of equations. Al-jabr is the word used in conjunction with moving subtracted quantities to the other side of the equation, and al-muq¯abala is used to combine like terms on opposite sides of the equation.”

          I have additional notes, if the literal source on the history of math is insufficient to convince you of the history of math.