Or just an apocalypse in general.

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 days ago

    I wouldn’t.

    These survivalist fantasies where people paint themselves as capable and not fodder…

    Hell, you outlast the outbreak/bomb you’ll probably die of sepsis the first time you get a bad cut or a tooth that goes rotten.

    If it is truly the apocalypse, you are best just letting go, because what follows after is like the end of night out at a club when they turn the lights on.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      … because what follows after is like the end of night out at a club when they turn the lights on.

      I always loved that bit when I used to go to the clubs, because I was aces at swimming between all the drunks.

      Not all us are helpless.

      Infections are a real risk, yeah, but I’ve literally some antibiotics in my fridge, don’t even remember where from. Sure they’re expired and for specifically I think ear/nose/mouth infections, but they’d be of some help. Also I have the basics of mycology down, so making my own antibiotics wouldn’t be out of the question. Would it be risky, and entail lots of shitting my guts out? Probably. But if it was an apocalypse scenario and I had a bad infection, I’d take my chances. Penicillin is quite common.

      I’ve also other medical supplies like large expensive-ish covers/pads for surgery wounds from my elbow surgery, they gave me extra ones as I had to keep it clean at home (and by extra I mean extra not ones I was supposed to use but in case I fucked it up etc) and general first aid kit ofc.

      I’ve also 25 liters of fresh water, just in case, and a car with a full tank of gas, a freezer full of food, would last me months, plus the dry stuff in the pantry. Weapons, not really. Lots of knives ofc, not kitchen knives, but puukko, Finnish knives. From a pretty much pvp version that’s almost a small sword, to small whittling ones. (Got my first one at four from my grandpa, proper puukko from Lappi.) Got some mace, a foldable shovel that also functions as an ax. And a very small poundage bow. (You could perhaps hurt people with it with good arrows but honestly it’s a teenagers practice bow, more for the psychological factor I think.)

      Besides all that, I also served a year in the military, where I went to officer training for supply logistics. Meaning everything you need to keep fighting fit, aside from medical assistance. Supplies, guns, bullets, clothing, water and especially food. So we were also taught how to slaughter and butcher various animals, and how to be relatively sure that what you’re eating and drinking isn’t going to kill you. (We also drilled a well in -20c by hand when the ground was literally frozen solid. Had to 6m deep iirc or was it even 8.) Also how warm you need to be, how much water you need daily. From all the basics from “don’t shit near where you make food” to more complex shit, like which bacteria live in which temp and what it takes to kill them.

      So you know. You might let go, but I wouldn’t. I’m no prepper, and in fact find them rather comical. However I do live about 300km from the Russian border, so I don’t think any of this is in any way fantastical or even highly improbable.

      I mean I don’t plan to crash a car when I’m in one, but I (almost) always use a seatbelt. Doesn’t mean I’m fantasising about crashes. But I have survived several though, so.

  • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Poorly.

    I could last a bit. We have outdoorsy supplies and can do without electricity, but it’s probably inevitable I’d just wind down or lose focus once and that’ll be that.

  • Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Water, shelter, food, security. Everything is viewed through the lens of those priorities, in order.

  • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I believe it’s generally accepted that zombies can’t climb, or at least, they are really bad at it. So you basically just need to take the high ground. If you can get up a ladder or something, you would basically be safe and could easily pick off any zombies below with a spear or other ranged weapon.

    Long term, I would probably go to the mountains, find a clean water source and plant crops. The mountainous terrain would be a big obstacle and most zombies probably wouldn’t even try to go up. For any that do, I could probably set up some traps to lead them off an edge where they would fall back to the bottom.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Mountains. I’ve never even seen one in real life. :( (It always fucking gets me when Bilbo goes “MOUNTAINS I want to see mountains again” so wistful looking)

      I’d probably have to go on an island.

      We’ve got the most in the world, iirc, 50 000 - 80 000 small islands.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not only I wouldn’t survive I would be that stupid character that makes the beloved character die because their idiocracy :3

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is the answer. Most people won’t survive the long term breakdown of society for long, and the “preppers” will probably be some of the first to go, as they will fight each other, become targets, and generally have a more antagonistic approach to survival. The people who stand the best chance will be the ones focused on collaboration and community building. But even then, surviving the initial collapse will be more about luck than intent.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think that one of the major problems isn’t even the zombies as such, but the collapse of infrastructure that we rely on to maintain our current populations. Transportation and associated trade. Electrical power. Fuel. Fertilizer.

      Like, even if you omitted zombies from the equation and took those away, the population that could be supported is probably a whole lot lower than the present population. Pre-industrial societies were not very populous compared to current ones.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrying_capacity

      The carrying capacity of an ecosystem is the maximum population size of a biological species that can be sustained by that specific environment, given the food, habitat, water, and other resources available. The carrying capacity is defined as the environment’s maximal load,[clarification needed] which in population ecology corresponds to the population equilibrium, when the number of deaths in a population equals the number of births (as well as immigration and emigration)

      Human carrying capacity is a function of how people live and the technology at their disposal. The two great economic revolutions that marked human history up to 1900—the agricultural and industrial revolutions—greatly increased the Earth’s human carrying capacity, allowing human population to grow from 5 to 10 million people in 10,000 BCE to 1.5 billion in 1900.[47] The immense technological improvements of the past 100 years—in applied chemistry, physics, computing, genetic engineering, and more—have further increased Earth’s human carrying capacity, at least in the short term. Without the Haber-Bosch process for fixing nitrogen, modern agriculture could not support 8 billion people.[48] Without the Green Revolution of the 1950s and 60s, famine might have culled large numbers of people in poorer countries during the last three decades of the twentieth century.[49]

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wizard Island is a 5 hour drive. Deep freshwater lake, surrounded by water on all sides. Fish. In a volcanic crater so any zombies coming have to summit the volcano first, then be visible on the rim before getting to the water, where they sink.

    • IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      My biggest concern would be the zombies contaminating the water with whatever virus/poison/venom that makes zombies. Even if they’re visible, the moment they touch water, I’d already be scared to drink.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I think that in general, the problem with water barriers is that they work well on humans, who need to breathe. But, depending upon the type of zombie universe in question, zombies may not. They may be able to just walk along the bottom.

      EDIT: And one other complication for the zombie apocalypse survivor who wants to set up near large, accessible sources of freshwater:

      https://www.stratcom.mil/Portals/8/Documents/FOIA/CONPLAN_8888-11.pdf

      HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES STRATEGIC COMMAND

      CDRUSTRATCOM CONPLAN 8888 "COUNTER-ZOMBIE DOMINANCE 30 APR 2011

      b. (U) Operational COG #2: Potable water sources (PWS)

      i. (U) Zombies do not drink water, but humans do. Humans typically cannot survive longer than 10 days without fresh water. Zombies will likely be drawn to potable water sources by the presence of human food sources that zombies prey on.

  • TacoTroubles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’d be just my luck that I wouldnt die quickly, being forced to trudge through worse and worse conditions.