• NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Copilot? You mean the AI with terms of service that are in bold and explicit: “for entertainment purposes only”?

    Which is why its in the title and not the article? EntertainBait?

            • Diurnambule
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              The hell. How can they expect people to understand ? They plan to sell 100 things under the same name and try to sell it as one big AI when it is hundred of différents things unrelated ?

              • Squizzy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Most of those are bundled, no one is buying copilot fot OneNote they just get it when the get the rest of that suite.

              • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                They’ve never been good at naming things, but they now seem to be going out of their way to try to be the worst with the names of their software. For instance, they named the successor to the already generically named “remote desktop protocol” “windows app”.

                • Diurnambule
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  This one is funny. Go google windows app commands. They just fucked sysadmins

          • Senal@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ok, so there are 70-81 copilots, github is one of them.

            Why is github copilot a different thing in the context of the reply that was being responded to ?

            • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Copilot is the harness, Claude and GPT are the models

              Copilot is by far the worst harness of all the major players

              • Senal@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yes, i get that, copilot is like opencode or cursor, though perhaps with less general access to models.

                There was a reply

                Copilot? You mean the AI with terms of service that are in bold and explicit: “for entertainment purposes only”?

                followed by

                I suppose GitHub Copilot is meant, which is a different thing.

                i was asking why github copilot is different in that context.

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Different in that it’s not an AI model, it’s just a tool you can use to run AI models like Claude.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I disagree.

        Legal stuff would be Use at your own risk, or answers may not be correct.

        This is really strong language.