• supafuzz [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    10 months ago

    The best part is that after all that expensive experience-gaining, when the project is over the consultants leave and the company is left with nothing. So they can just rinse/repeat in a year or three

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      10 months ago

      One of the more common practices is to simply insource the consultants. There’s a perverse incentive, wherein you’re paying $300/hr for a guy getting paid $40/hr, so you eventually realize you can offer them a 50% raise and achieve 80% savings in a single stroke.

      • supafuzz [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        10 months ago

        it makes perfect financial sense but I’ve never actually seen that happen haha

        what I see is that once a project is finished it gets outsourced further to employees or contractors in south asia who know even less than the consultants did

        • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’ve gotten that kind of offer when working in one of these contractor jobs a couple of times. but it was always from the absolute worst places that I would not consider working for directly, for any amount of money. like think paranoid executives building toxic workplaces where people sometimes die of stress-induced heart attack type shit. having a layer between me and them was protective and I was willing to “pay” 50% of my salary as protection money.