Heirloom vegetables grow more slowly and spoil much more quickly than modern crops. This is because modern crops have less nutritional value - https://jeroenvanbaar.substack.com/p/data-dispatch-4-the-falling-nutritional

That article recommends eating a better diet. Sure. Seems a bit idealist. Here’s some more actionable advice: everyone should take a multivitamin and magnesium glycinate. If you live somewhere that gets a winter take vitamin D too.

I’m speaking from experience here, I used to get sick every winter and my skin would get so dry it would crack and bleed. Take your vitamins.

  • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    11 months ago

    CW for the vegans, I’ll be talking about canned fish in this comment

    Check out those deenz, folks. Try and descend your snouts into a funky can of sardines this season. They’re real good; rich in bio-available Vitamin D, rich in healthy fats and they got a lot of calcium too. Get some tasty sardines (ideally, with skin on and bones in), laid to rest in a fresh drizzle of olive oil and enjoy that little bite of the seas. I’ve started eating a bunch of canned fish (mostly herring and sardines, tuna isn’t ideal) this winter and my skin is a lot better, as is the seasonal depression. Can recommend

    it’s nature’s multivitamin, really

        • macerated_baby_presidents [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Careful, many “vegan collagen supplements” are not actually collagen, they’re other things which supposedly increase collagen production. (I don’t know if there’s any evidence that works.) Collagen is a mix of proteins, which you could get microbes to produce. (And then we could make vegan gelatin from it.)

    • bigboopballs [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I fuckin love canned tuna (skipjack or light, not albacore so much).

      I’ve only tried a canned fish besides tuna or salmon once, it was sardines and I didn’t like it. I’d kind of like to try other canned fish but I’m afraid I’ll be disappointed again.

      • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You could try a medium-sized fish, like herring. It’s often canned in some kind of tomato-sauce and it generally breaks up more due to the size of it. No skin or bones. If you like tuna, this could be right up your alley.
        Generally, I’d also advise to have some good bread with it or some crackers or something like that. You could also try it with rice, I think.

    • crispy_lol [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s really not, canned fish is basically one level up from bologna, which is what the canned fish mediasphere is full of.

      It’s high in sodium, saturated fat (compared to healthy proteins), contaminants (bpa/pcbs/mercury), this is basically the 2024 version of “butter is healthy actually” and god it fucking sucks just eat plants idiot

      • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        high in sodium

        you’re thinking of anchovies, I think. There’s less than a gram of salt in the 100g sardines sitting in front of me rn

        high in saturated fats

        again, from the sardines on my desk: 17,3g of fat per 100g; only 3,5g of those are saturated. Idk if that’s high to you, but it doesn’t seem to be to me

        bpa, pcbs

        like all canned foods, yea. High, also is relative here, though I can’t really find reliable numbers rn. If you know more, please share

        mercury

        not really, I think you’re thinking of tuna? Sardines are a very small fish near the bottom of the food network, feeding on krill - there isn’t really much bio-accumulation going on here, compared to bigger fish. There’s some mercury in them for sure, but you’d have to eat a lot of sardines to get to dangerous levels

        This post has been paid for by the North Atlantic Fishery Council, I hope you have enjoyed this social media content and will consider consuming 100 - 400g of canned sardines per day.

        Also just wanna say, it’s not very nice of you to be calling me an idiot when I even went out of my way to provide a CW for vegan sensibilities. I did find your post in response pretty funny though. Also also, I am eating those beans as well, don’t you worry.

          • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes, they do.

            (Desk meaning the table my surfing machine rests on. I have never consumed canned fish at the workplace. The NAFC stands for and promotes a responsible use of canned fish.)

        • crispy_lol [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The hand waving of mercury in sardines is really bad, they don’t not have mercury because tuna has more you silly Billy, and tiny amount of mercury are toxic and cause negative effects but go off king!!!

        • crispy_lol [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s ok, go ahead and eat all that shit and deny it’s bad for you because worse food has more of it. There’s literally no other option. Except you know, plants

  • Melina [they/them, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 months ago

    This simply isn’t true or backed by evidence that is completely biased. Produce especially root vegetables like onions and potatoes still retain most of their nutritional value the only difference being the size of the vegetable in correlation with its total nutritional content which varies dramatically from a potato let’s say was grown fifty years ago.

    A lot of these alleged studies into the nutritional drop off of our food is subsequently more harmful towards consumers because for starters, it reinforces the idea that fresh produce is “very bad” therefore you shouldn’t touch them. Another consequence is forcing people to know focus solely on consuming ready made manufactured products high in preservatives and other additives rather than planning meals consisting of fresh produce. And it goes without saying, anti GMO rhetoric which is akin to antivax conspiracy theories.

    It is advised you consume vitamins anyway as a lot of foods contain small amounts of those that make up our daily intake, but at the same time they are not essential to your diet and are part of a bigger predatory market.

    The more we push the idea that produce is bad the less people are likely to consume them and replace these essentials with more harmful foods or none at all, the reality is produce is starting to become “less profitable” as land becomes less fertile because of the consequences of climate change, if we want healthier produce, we must stop using fossil fuels- that will not happen so produce will stop producing higher yields and the cost will inflate - the rich will always have access to these goods and the rest of us will be eating carcinogenic imitation fruit paste in our pod apartments.

    • BigHaas [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      If food is less nutritionally dense but equally filling, on a population level malnutrition will become more common. The conclusion is that we should all eat more vegetables, I’m not sure what you’re talking about with the “fresh produce is bad” thing. This has nothing to do with GMOs or depleted land, it’s the result of markets making our food. Produce from local farmers markets is more good than supermarket produce but it’s all good.

      Here’s a study showing people that supplement have less deficiencies than people that don’t: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579642/

      Also vitamin D is it’s own thing, deficiencies in that are caused by office jobs not diet. It’s a hormone. Almost everyone should take it daily.

  • oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    You take multivitamins because you think the food you eat isn’t nutritious enough. I take multivitamins because I plan on buying 8000lb of rice and subsisting entirely off of that for the next 10 years. We are not the same.

  • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Partially true but probably the least important ill of the modern age

    far more important is the bioaccumulation of pesticides and heavy metals and plastics

    and obviously the bioweapons being directly administered into the alveoli

    also stress uses up energy and micronutrients faster, this is way more important IMO than vegetables being 10% less nutritious (veggies and fruits are still the healthiest and least degraded thing since the before-fore times)