• TrudeauCastroson [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    39·
    1 year ago

    I was first exposed to the pencil thing, then I heard Marx’s critique of commodity fetishism and realized how much of economics is just blow-hards.

    Adam Smith already wrote about the division of labour in the production of iron pins, it’s retreading the same ground but going “isn’t it great that we’re outsourcing to so many different places that it makes it harder to organize labour”

    The pencil thing is retreading something from hundreds of years earlier and ignoring critique since then.

    • emizeko [they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
      33·
      1 year ago

      It is so frustrating to argue with libs who make arguments so old that literally Marx himself responded to them. I get the impression that Marxists already won the debate back in the 19th century and the liberal tactic has just been to pretend the debate has never happened, to continue repeating centuries-old arguments over and over again as if they’ve never been responded to, and to discourage anyone from looking into Marxism or reading Marx, Lenin, Mao, etc.

      by aimixin

      • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
        15·
        1 year ago

        This reminds me of the deboonking of Marxism by Bawerk or whatever his name is. Anti-communists allege that no one has ever made a counter argument, showing that communism is epically owned. I eventually found out that Conforth demolished that shit not long after it came out, but the lolberts never bring that up.