fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 年前We don't judge here. :)mander.xyzimagemessage-square85linkfedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down145
arrow-up1979arrow-down1imageWe don't judge here. :)mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 年前message-square85linkfedilink
minus-squaremilicent_bystandr@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 年前 usually people consider mathematicians as scientists Yikes! … Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.
minus-squareBigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 年前You can call them whatever you want, what are they going to do? They’re historians!
minus-squaremilicent_bystandr@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 年前In twenty years time they’ll rip into me on r/askhistorians
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前Historians are scientists imo. Is that a reference I don’t have?
minus-squaremilicent_bystandr@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 年前Usually (in my experience?) history is one of the ‘humanities’, which are more lumped with arts than sciences.
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前Yes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.
Yikes!
… Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.
You can call them whatever you want, what are they going to do? They’re historians!
In twenty years time they’ll rip into me on r/askhistorians
Historians are scientists imo. Is that a reference I don’t have?
Usually (in my experience?) history is one of the ‘humanities’, which are more lumped with arts than sciences.
Yes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.