• RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    The Civil War started when The Houthi Militia attacked the capital. They are the perpetrators of the whole conflict suggesting otherwise would be akin to suggesting it was the union’s fault that the confederates attacked Fort Sumner despite the obvious fact that one side started shooting first which in Yemen’s case is The Houthi.

    You looked it up in what sources because it seems like you used trash tier ones.

    • sudo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Buddy the CSA wasn’t bad because they fired on Fort Sumner. They were bad because they were slavers. If the Union shot first they’d still be in the right. Grow a moral backbone. Ansarallah did not starve Yemen. The Saudis and the Americans did.

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I never said that is why the CSA was bad. He analogy is that the Houthi are not any more the resistance than the CSA were as the aggressor that starts a conflict cannot be the victim of it.

        The whole narrative that the Houthi, who are without question the instigator of the entire conflict, are somehow victims is really gross and tone deaf.

        The Houthi are in fact responsible for many if not most of the starvation at this point.