moe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoX expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square169linkfedilinkarrow-up1736arrow-down122 cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1714arrow-down1external-linkX expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunchtechcrunch.commoe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square169linkfedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.online
minus-squareRhaedas@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up81·2 years agoNot if there’s fewer there to see ads. They’re still a business with a bottom line, even if what they do is terrible.
minus-squaredanc4498@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoLess of a boycott and more of a logical business decision.
minus-squareAnivia@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years ago Not if there’s fewer there to see ads But you usually pay per click or impression, not a flat rate. So that alone shouldn’t be a reason for them to stop advertising there
Not if there’s fewer there to see ads. They’re still a business with a bottom line, even if what they do is terrible.
Yea, fair point.
Less of a boycott and more of a logical business decision.
But you usually pay per click or impression, not a flat rate. So that alone shouldn’t be a reason for them to stop advertising there