For the record I was posting in support of inclusive language, but pointing out that context and convention matter.

They seem to have even scrubbed my comment from their instance, lol.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Wow, somebody that day was salty, and pretty much just looking for a comment to get mad about.

    There’s another FOSS project idea: a bot that detects Lemmy bans and sends you a notification about it.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Another idea, take the mod log and allow voting on mod actions in a way that makes unpopular ones more visible. Give the users tools to evaluate moderators and admins to speed up the process of removing bad mods or users discovering they shouldn’t bother with an instance with bad admins. Or, with a different sorting method, it could highlight mods that aren’t power tripping losers.

      Maybe a similar system for reporting, since it wouldn’t surprise me if some mods feel like they need to act because of pressure from losers who power trip with the report button. You know, the kind that feels the need to inform people they’ve been reported.

      • xor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        well you could just make a lemmy community about spurious bans and people could vote on it, and you could tag them in the comments somewhere….

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I got banned from lemmy.world/c/linuxsucks, which is one person’s mental illness, so who cares? Doesn’t stop me from calling them an idiot when they show up elsewhere.

    • xor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      dude is masculine in every definition i’ve found (looked it up) except for a city slicker new to a ranch…
      i’ve always known it to be gender neutral… but i have a female friend that gets offended every time someone calls her that.
      but the fact that it keeps happening means that it’s gender neutral to all of those people too (she’s a fairly feminine female).
      that said, it’s best to just call people terms that they are comfortable with, not ones that you’re comfortable calling them.
      personally, i find calling a single person they/them a little obtuse, but it’s not really that hard. (slightly confusing when there’s a question of whether im referring to them or a group of people).

      • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Except when it comes to cultural/generational uses of words. Every generation has words they use in a altered way. Dude was one such word when I was young. It was used by my generation in a way that didn’t exactly match the definition. Just like all the other generations use words out context with their written definitions. Its why I laugh when the younger generations get mad because they think they invented the concept.

        • xor@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          yeah, it’s almost as if language is an evolving thing….
          but fuck that noise, i only accept definitions from the 1876 edition of Merrium-Webster… all other usages are wrong.
          (i do seriously had when the nounify a verb like “cringe” or making “sus” mean anything at all bad…

  • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    who cares. some of these communities are trash who don’t allow you to participate if you don’t align with their views. no different than reddit.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      OP’s complaint is that he was not aware of the ban so he was commenting into nothing.

      This is really software issue, they can ban him, and he can block them back. No problem at all.

      The issue is that these servers are blocking new people and they might get pissed about not knowing it. This is UX issue for fediverse.

      On top of it, these bans are arbitrary and capricious for the most part, so again, this will piss anyone who does know how fediverse works.

      We got 50k AMU, with too many mods with nothing to do, so they find busy work.

      • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        fair but I’ve been banned because I didn’t follow the flow of the political narrative of the conversation. I don’t consider myself squarely in one camp so I read, understand, and comment/criticize what I feel I want to engage with. I will admit i was auto banned from one instance and got no response from anyone, so I can relate to what your comment is getting at.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          I didn’t follow the flow of the political narrative of the conversation.

          There is a lot of censorship on lemmy both personal bias and outright regime narrative support.

          That’s a huge issue, no doubt.

  • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Is there a way to ban users before they comment/post?

    Preemptive banning of trolls is something Lemmy could use. I shouldn’t have to wait until they post.

  • Magnolia_@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Same, was banned for totally trivial reasons like being racist or something like that.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Depending on what you were replying to, I could see how that is transphobic. Like if you were replying to someone saying they don’t like to be called dude and you end the post with “get over it, dude!”?

    You said it yourself. Context matters.

    For what it’s worth, I’ve met trans women who dislike the term dude. It might be more common than you think.

    Also, after thinking on this more, I feel more confident it has to do with the hypothetical “if you’re offended [by me calling you dude], get over it dude” as doubling down on using a term someone doesn’t want you to as soon as they’ve told you not to.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          OP stated what his intention and meaning here was but we got half a comment section int his thread trying prove that he meant something else.

          Very paternalistic behavior:

          1. removing OP’s agency then
          2. imposing punitive measure
          3. gas lighting “we told you what you meant, stfu!”

          Microcosm of the modding around much of Lemmy really. People with poor reading comprehension or outright bad faith actors?

          • yuri@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            babe the person you replied to stated that the context of the initial post matters.

            no matter the intention, it’s important to consider what the actual impact of the post could’ve been. you just took the piss. my replies to you are reiterating that the context DOES matter, and isn’t just “vibes”.

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              The context here is that OP was posting on lemmy.world when got accosted by some random person about usage of word “dude” being transphobic, which is not true.

              no matter the intention

              ohh really intent don’t matter no more?

              what sort of clown position is this? accusing people of “crimes” and it does not matter if they even meant to commit the crime?

              it’s important to consider what the actual impact of the post could’ve been

              If you are going to harass people online about their choice of words, they will clap back. This is internet 101.

              • yuri@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                7 days ago

                they clearly weren’t banned for an intent that they only expressed in the post complaining about being banned. i hope you’re being willfully dense, because i can’t help you if you GENUINELY think this bullshit.

                • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  yes i genuinely think that this modding is grade A clown behavior lol

                  the solution is to block the instance, that’s the lesson here.

                  overzealous modding will eventually isolate instances with overzealous modding into echo chambers.

                  but we need these discussions so that general public is educated on these issues.

                  cheers!