• luckyhunter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    77
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s insane. He’s literally saying “early bird gets the worm” is true and we should punish the early bird. When the obvious solution is to set your damn alarm earlier.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 year ago

      Christ I hate you people. You think everyone is a morning person, some people are just lazy about it. You are literally incapable of imagining that other people are not like you.

    • Lonnie123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or figure out something that doesnt require you to be up that early?? There is science out there that there are genuinely “morning people” and “night owls”, setting an alarm is a fine thing to do but it literally is in opposition to some people biology. I have been fortunate in my line of work (nursing, where shifts are usually either 7am or 7pm start times) to find a shift that starts and noon and ends at mid night, perfect for me.

      • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah exactly, there’s plenty of demand and opportunities for 2nd shift or 3rd shift work out there. Just because there’s no demand for 3rd shift bank tellers doesn’t mean there’s a problem.

    • dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Excellent use of your empathy there.

      If I have to do it so should everybody mentality.

      If some humans can handle lactose and others can’t. Some suffer from migraines whilst others don’t etc. you don’t think it’s possible that we also have different circadian rhythms.

      Perhaps you could exercise some critical thought. Maybe go read any of the various studies on sleep and make an informed decision rather than a knee jerk reaction.

      Also, positive intent. Just assume people are being truthful for the most part. Life is easier if you’re not looking to shit on people.

      • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        I run a business, not a therapy group. Assuming people are being truthful is how people walk all over you. Trust is earned.

        • dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. Trust is lost.

          If Apple can exercise positive intent as a core tenant of their business then so could yours.

          Assuming everyone is out to get you is how you end up bitter.

          • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you believe Apple is practicing what it preaches I have a bridge to sell you. But yes, trust that is earned can be lost very easy.

              • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                as CEO? any other C-suite position? Because a publicly traded company’s #1 duty is to generate profit for share holders. “touchy feely nice nice” policies go as far as they can before they start impacting profit.

                • dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I guess I can’t reason you out of a mindset that you didn’t arrive at through reason in the first place.

                  With that said have a nice day and try to be better!

                  Tu eres aburrida.

        • dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can’t see that the more people cycle or the more bus lanes we have also means less cars.

          Try framing it like this. Every time you see a cyclist remember that’s one less car. Or a bus could be 20-50 less cars on the road.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Buses, that makes sense. But never in the history of bike lanes has replacing a car lane with a bike lane meant as many cyclists using that lane as cars did before. Replacing car lanes with bike lanes in no way helps efficiently move people.

            It’s better for the environment, so I support it, but let’s be real here.

            • SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, never is a bit of a strong word here. Copenhagen and Amsterdam have something to say about that. Now I’m not a fuckcars person, but I do see the value for those places. I am also aware that it works there because of multiple factors that do not necessarily translate well to other places, not just plopping a bike lane and hoping people won’t just use it for parking their cars. Oslo, for instance does not have the same infrastructure for bikes as Copenhagen does, presumably because they get worse winters?

              I’ll say this, though, I was extremely surprised to see a traffic jam on the bike lane and no jam on the car lane.

            • dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Have you ever been to London? Because we have many many cycle lanes and it does help the flow of traffic.

              Ever heard of Amsterdam?

              I’m happy to be shown some examples to the contrary though.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Did they add a bike lane? Or did they replace a car lane?

                I can 100% guarantee that any place that has removed a car lane and replaced it with a bike lane has people moving less efficiently. The math is inescapable.

                • dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  here

                  here

                  You can’t guarantee anything of the sort, but fyi many of the routes are from road lanes, it’s London after all not much room for lateral space, but many places have put them at the side of the roads.

      • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m a privileged business owner, I’m open when I say I’m open. I’m not going to start a nigh shift just because someone wants to work one. they only way I would is if some government entity punished me and forced me to do so.

    • Franklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Adapting a system to suit more people when it exclusively suits you will always feel like oppression. In reality it is letting others enjoy the privilege that you already enjoy

      • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        They system already adapted by creating electricity and alarm clocks, and for the night owls, night shifts.

        • Franklin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Night shifts are the only night owl specific concession and society as a whole of very much does not run like that. Flexible work schedules are the outlier by a wide margin.

          Still glad to see it improving

    • Johanno@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      So if I set my alarm earlier than I will turn it off and wait for my emergency alarm to go off.

      I should got into bed earlier: well it might work but I am just not tired then. If I go to bed at 10 or 11 pm I will just stay awake for hours in my bed.

      Luckily I have wfh and don’t have to attend meetings before 10 am. Sometimes I get out of bed 10 minutes before 10 and I still feel tired.