• brsrklf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course the article sounds stupid, it’s written by GPT too.

      It’s freaking MSN. Two weeks ago, they published an article describing a recently deceased basketball player as having become “useless” now.

      That was a very “robot” point of view, I guess.

        • brsrklf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apparently so.

          I saw the source was Reuters, but didn’t see it was unedited. I wonder what’s the excuse for the dumb title then.

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean it’s not wrong. Except maybe fertiliser I guess.

        Probably good ai hasn’t made that connection yet.

  • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder what the practical difference will be between accessing ChatGPT through Bing vs accessing Bing through ChatGPT. I don’t have a premium account with OpenAI so I cannot test myself. Anyone given it a whirl?

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In my experience ChatGPT and Bing provide completely different output for the same prompt.

      It’s the same underlying technology but the end product is completely different. I find ChatGPT Plus infinitely more useful than Bing.

      As a test, I just had a chat with both about a big news story that dropped yesterday… and both answered the questions reasonably well, but they weren’t the same at all and I preferred ChatGPT.