• Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 month ago

    France’s imperial ambition to be independent of the US should be viewed as a useful tool of bourgeoise division and working with France should be seen as keeping it from falling entirely into vassalisation under US imperial control.

    • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      France was financing Brazil’s nuclear submarine program (before the 2016 coup). Which pissed the US off, now France is financing it again under Lula da Silva (again, probably bc Macron really fucking hates Bolsonaro and prefers Lula), lol.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 month ago

        Right, exactly. And in the context of a clash between capitalism and communism I’d rather have several opportunist bourgeoise factions representing multiple imperial projects rather than one imperial dominion under the United States.

        Working with the weaker imperial projects on safe things that do not threaten socialism is ok. Working with the US is not.

  • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    If anyone here freaks out about cooperation agreements with the west keep in mind these are several rungs below the cooperation with Laos, Cambodia, and China, VERY explicitly so

    • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s precisely why I think this is a money making scheme for rich officials and contractors in Hanoi, the amounts are too low to set off the state’s corruption detectors, but the precedent still sets a bad example institutionally

      • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Hanoi needs some serious infrastructure so I do agree the amounts should be higher but this is paranoid thinking

        The country is poor and literally every facet of infrastructure could do with cash injection, there’s hardly room for graft without pissing people off. They actually sentence people for it and NGOs aren’t getting a free ride anymore.

        The level of pessimism coming out here from people who don’t even know how these cooperation agreements work is kind of disappointing.

        • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          French capital is not investing for the sake of Viet rail and the wild returns that would bring in

          This is quid pro quo under the table deal making and graft, the French are purchasing access to something they think will make real money and definitely something they shouldn’t have access to

          • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean feel free to back any of that up but it really just seems like bong rip paranoia that flies in the face of how these cooperation agreements work and the competition and diplomatic pressure France is facing

            Capital outflows from imperialist countries have not created rail development abroad beyond what was needed to extract resources for a century in many places so imperialists paying for infrastructure is symbolically a reversal, it’s bringing them to heel

            • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              Capital outflows from imperialist countries have not created rail development abroad beyond what was needed to extract resources for a century in many places so imperialists paying for infrastructure is symbolically a reversal, it’s bringing them to heel

              That’s my point, the French wouldn’t pay for infrastructure unless they thought they were getting something out of it, if there’s a clear reversal (symbolic or otherwise) the French wouldn’t so much as return Hanoi’s calls

              Obviously the French see a door that is open or appears to be open, a door that most likely has nothing to do with rail (considering the comically low amount they’re investing) and shouldn’t be open to begin with

              Whether that “door” is actually open and the Vietnamese aren’t just playing 4d chess on Paris is up for debate, I hope they are

            • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              The french corporations are not interested in selling trains, they’re interested in making Profit ON selling trains, and the lack of profitability is blatantly clear in light of the low amounts they’ve invested in the form of loans

              Selling trains to a public service state entity in Vietnam is not profitable in itself, the loan is a ticket purchase for access to Vietnamese resources or industries that are profitable when invested in

              What the French are purchasing access to isn’t specified publicly, but it sure as shit ain’t access to build rail for working class Vietnamese in the form of sub-strandard inter-industry foreign loans

    • TheLastHero [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      China being their neighbor might actually be the problem, you don’t want to become overly reliant on one country, especially one with past and present border conflicts (SCS)

    • FloridaBoi [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m sure the Chinese didn’t develop their HSR system without foreign consulting and experts just like how France was also consulting for California HSR. Not that the Chinese aren’t capable but why reinvent the wheel when you can get engineering expertise in your exact problem and they can train your domestic workers.

      • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah the game plan is literally China 30 years ago. Cambodia and Laos fly under the radar but their rate of development is fantastic with this strategy. I don’t think some people here understand how badly Hanoi needs regular highways and bus lines too.

    • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      They do cooperate with China! China is still a developing country and France is one of the imperial cutpurses of the west, so winning that plunder back in the form of infrastructure (and not cracking their markets open for the West) is advantageous and not really what France wants.

    • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      John_candy_brainwashing.mp4

      (due to the looming presence of other replies I have not answered this is explicitly a joke)

  • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Are you guys seriously getting the heebie jeebies about Hanoi getting a bridge fixed? This reminds me of when the Maoists who took over the WTYP discord went nuts over China calling an automated bus that followed a painted street a “railless train”.

    TRUST THE PLAN!

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If I was gonna sign an agreement to build rail in my country, I wouldn’t go with France, or frankly any western country

    This shit smacks of personnel graft at the top of Hanoi

    Minister Nguyen Van Thang thanked AFD for providing loans for Vietnam’s railway infrastructure development projects and hoped that with AFD’s active support and coordination

    Ah yes rail, the industry famous for profitability and ease of debt servicing

    • vovchik_ilich [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wouldn’t go with France, or frankly any western country

      To be fair, being Spanish, I’m kinda proud of our public high speed railways. Uzbekistan for example had their high speed lines made by the Spanish, and I think it’s one of the (if not the) cheapest high speed rails in the world per km, and fairly decent.

      • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Uzbekistan mentioned!!! I am so optimistic about Central Asia I am sure I am missing some nasty surprises for the future. I almosr wish it could fly more under the radar but it’s going to be further used as an attack surfacs against Russia and China.

        • vovchik_ilich [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Damn, are you Uzbeki? If so, I’m so interested in your country. The architecture is so different to that of my country and so beautiful, you have such an ancient and rich history being in the middle of the silk road, food looks absolutely amazing (I had the chance to try Uzbek bread in Russia and it was great)… Tell me more pls T_T

          • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            No I have one Uzbek friend and it went to my head I’m sorry 🥲 I live in Vietnam 😃

            I have been reading a lot about Kazakhstan to try to catch up before the Washington inter-agency racket really starts trying to fuck with them again

            • vovchik_ilich [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Oh, Vietnam is also super cool. I mostly know from Luna Oi, as I don’t have any friends or acquaintances from Vietnam, but the people look very friendly and nice and the cuisine also amazing. I’m afraid to say I don’t know much of the ancient history of Vietnam, it would be interesting to know more! Any good resources on it in English? I’m thinking something like the channel Gates of Kilikien for the history of China, but for Vietnam.

              • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Well I have mostly read some bougie ancient history of Vietnam but I will post some screenshots from more based books which aren’t specifically about Vietnam but have useful sections about Vietnamese history (also Laos Cambodia and China) with Libgen links on /c/history@lemmy.ml or here and ping you when I get home

                I am pretty lightweight on ancient history everywhere and I’ve been trying to remedy it. While I often diverge from their opinions on modern times post-1990, world systems writers are very good about this. There are a few journals here and there which actually post world systems papers too

  • Pili [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well I’m happy that the Vietnamese are gonna get new rails, but please Macron can you also fix the ones you have at home?

    • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      They already do this with the US! Big problem with opening up to the US was NGO people stealing infrastructure data but I’m pretty sure they were going to find a way to get that one way or another. The capital inflows being managed by the state is more important.

  • xiaohongshu [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    I guess getting kicked out of Sahel means you have to find another victim as replacement for the export of capital. And while we’re at it, why not call up your former colony who had already kicked you out once and ask if they’re still willing to play?

  • SadArtemis [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Who’s going to build it? Lmao… I suppose if the Viets are just pulling one on France though, good on them (and if they actually build the rail while doing so, all the better)